Page 5 of 5

PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2020 4:10 pm
by Stellar Colonies
Honeydewistania wrote:
Lucius Caecilius Iucundus wrote:"All of the objections to this proposal, it seems, relate to its objectives per se, as opposed to its ability to fulfill these objectives. In light of this, our intention is to submit this proposal within a few days. If anyone would like to state any objections between now and then, they should do so promptly."

You can’t submit this without the repeal of Permit Male Circumsicion. Draft one or get whoever drafted one before to submit theirs

Yes, this one I believe.

PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2020 12:03 pm
by Sierra Lyricalia
Stellar Colonies wrote:
Honeydewistania wrote:You can’t submit this without the repeal of Permit Male Circumsicion. Draft one or get whoever drafted one before to submit theirs

Yes, this one I believe.


OOC: There's no contradiction IMO. This proposal does not ban circumcision, it regulates it (analogous to how regulations on nuclear weapons and materials do not violate NAPA). The closest thing to a contradiction might be 141's classification of circumcision as a "medical procedure," which invokes GAR #29, the Patients' Rights Act, which says parents and guardians may be classed as "patients" for purposes of consenting to medical procedures on their children/wards. But I doubt anyone would argue that a trans rights proposal prohibiting the use of hormones or surgery on children would contradict that provision, so I can't see how this would.

- 1/6 GenSec

PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 3:08 pm
by Cosmosplosion
OOC: As of this time, I will be joining work on this resolution as a co-author. I look forward to working with the author on crafting a resolution to tackle this issue, while addressing the wide range of concerns presented.

PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 3:11 pm
by Marxist Germany
OOC: Against.

PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 5:45 pm
by Cosmosplosion
OOC: A plethora of you have messaged me regarding the author and have sent me a host of comments previously made by them.

I have no interest in working with someone with this history. I have no interest in supporting someone with this history. I will not be working on this proposal.

I support the concept at hand, and will the explore the area more in the future.

EDIT: The author reached out to me, asking if I would be willing to work with him privately. I reject that proposal fully.