NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Convention on Automated Flight

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Cretox State
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1027
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

[DRAFT] Convention on Automated Flight

Postby Cretox State » Tue Jun 09, 2020 11:44 am

"In an attempt to address the gap in the definition of 'aircraft' within GAR#464, 'Protection of Airspace', we intend to put forth a proposal protecting the national sovereignty of airspace as pertaining to entirely and somewhat automated aircraft, such as drones and those with onboard autopilot systems."

Category: Regulation
Area of Effect: Transportation
The World Assembly,

Affirming it is in the interest of every nation to ensure the sovereignty of its territory, of which a nation's airspace is a vital part;

Understanding it is internationally desirable to protect said sovereignty in order to promote development and prevent conflicts arising over intrusion upon such;

Noting the efforts of prior legislation to protect the sovereignty of national airspace;

Aware of the increasing automation of flight, through such technology as autopilots and flight control systems;

Recognizing the absence of legislation protecting the sovereignty of airspace as pertaining to aircraft utilizing such technology;

Hereby,
  1. Instructs the International Transport Safety Committee (ITSC) to create and maintain a reasonable definition for the altitude at which the atmosphere for the purposes of airfoil-based powered flight ends and outer space begins, to be used by this and future international legislation;
  2. Defines for the purposes of this legislation:
    1. "Airspace" as the above-surface region of the atmosphere below the aforementioned altitude;
    2. "National airspace" as airspace above the area encompassed by a nation's recognized territorial borders on land and water, as well as any additional airspace assigned to that nation through international agreement;
    3. "International airspace" as any airspace not meeting the above conditions;
    4. An "automated aircraft" as any flight-capable object, which possesses systems or devices whose effect is to make the object not entirely controlled by a sapient operator;
    5. A "state aircraft" as any automated aircraft whose function is military, police, or customs in nature;
    6. A "civil aircraft" as any automated aircraft which does not fit the above definition;
  3. Recognizes the complete and exclusive sovereignty of every member-nation over its national airspace as pertaining to the movement of automated aircraft, except as otherwise noted by international law;
  4. Clarifies that, except as otherwise noted by international law:
    1. No state aircraft of a member-nation may fly over the national airspace of another without prior authorization by agreement between the two member-nations or otherwise;
    2. No civil aircraft not containing a sapient operator may fly over the national airspace of a member-nation without prior authorization from said nation;
    3. No civil aircraft following a predetermined flight path may enter the national airspace of a member-nation without prior authorization from said nation;
  5. Permits:
    1. A civil aircraft with a sapient operator present within itself following a predetermined flight path to enter the national airspace of a member-nation, so long as the appropriate authorities of the member-nation in question are notified as soon as is reasonably possible and the civil aircraft in question is not being used for purposes inconsistent with international law;
    2. A member nation to require the landing of any civil or state aircraft over its territory, so long as this requirement is adequately communicated to the operator or operators of the automated aircraft in question, and the automated aircraft is not impounded unnecessarily;
    3. Any automated aircraft compliant with ITSC regulations to operate in international airspace.
Last edited by Cretox State on Fri Jun 12, 2020 9:54 am, edited 2 times in total.
GA/SC/Issues author. Public Servant. Killer of Stats. Thought Leader. Influencer. P20 Laureate. Delegate Emeritus of thousands of regions.

User avatar
Cretox State
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1027
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Cretox State » Wed Jun 10, 2020 10:47 am

OOC: Bumping if there’s any feedback.
GA/SC/Issues author. Public Servant. Killer of Stats. Thought Leader. Influencer. P20 Laureate. Delegate Emeritus of thousands of regions.

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Wed Jun 10, 2020 10:23 pm

Cretox State wrote:OOC: Bumping if there’s any feedback.

OOC: There will be, but this is one of the complex issues that needs some research (both of RL and WA laws) before meaningful comments can be given. And the middle of the week is not necessarily a time when people have extra time to throw at a text-based game like this.

Patience, young padawan. ;)
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Kenmoria
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 7917
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Kenmoria » Thu Jun 11, 2020 3:52 am

“Don’t 4b and 5a self-contradict? It’s possible for a civil aircraft not containing a person to also not have a predetermined flight path. Also, preambles shouldn’t contain both ‘whereas’ clauses and gerund clauses; stick with one or the other.”
Hello! I’m a GAer and NS Roleplayer from the United Kingdom.
My pronouns are he/him.
Any posts that I make as GenSec will be clearly marked as such and OOC. Conversely, my IC ambassador in the General Assembly is Ambassador Fortier. I’m always happy to discuss ideas about proposals, particularly if grammar or wording are in issue. I am also Executive Deputy Minister for the WA Ministry of TNP.
Kenmoria is an illiberal yet democratic nation pursuing the goals of communism in a semi-effective fashion. It has a very broad diplomatic presence despite being economically developing, mainly to seek help in recovering from the effect of a recent civil war. Read the factbook here for more information; perhaps, I will eventually finish it.

User avatar
Cretox State
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1027
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Cretox State » Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:42 am

Kenmoria wrote:“Don’t 4b and 5a self-contradict? It’s possible for a civil aircraft not containing a person to also not have a predetermined flight path. Also, preambles shouldn’t contain both ‘whereas’ clauses and gerund clauses; stick with one or the other.”

"Good point. We are considering whether to simply discard the "clarifies" and "permits" sections and limit the proposal to just affirming sovereignty of airspace."
Last edited by Cretox State on Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:43 am, edited 2 times in total.
GA/SC/Issues author. Public Servant. Killer of Stats. Thought Leader. Influencer. P20 Laureate. Delegate Emeritus of thousands of regions.

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Thu Jun 11, 2020 12:14 pm

Cretox State wrote:
Kenmoria wrote:“Don’t 4b and 5a self-contradict? It’s possible for a civil aircraft not containing a person to also not have a predetermined flight path. Also, preambles shouldn’t contain both ‘whereas’ clauses and gerund clauses; stick with one or the other.”

"Good point. We are considering whether to simply discard the "clarifies" and "permits" sections and limit the proposal to just affirming sovereignty of airspace."

And why would we need something “affirming” that when there is already a perfectly good resolution which does just that? viewtopic.php?p=35834884#p35834884
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Cretox State
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1027
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Cretox State » Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:14 pm

Grays Harbor wrote:
Cretox State wrote:"Good point. We are considering whether to simply discard the "clarifies" and "permits" sections and limit the proposal to just affirming sovereignty of airspace."

And why would we need something “affirming” that when there is already a perfectly good resolution which does just that? viewtopic.php?p=35834884#p35834884

OOC: “Protection of Airspace” defines aircraft as “controlled entirely by sapient beings.” I don’t believe it worthwhile to repeal the resolution, but I would like to fill the gap in that definition.
GA/SC/Issues author. Public Servant. Killer of Stats. Thought Leader. Influencer. P20 Laureate. Delegate Emeritus of thousands of regions.

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Thu Jun 11, 2020 2:16 pm

Cretox State wrote:OOC: “Protection of Airspace” defines aircraft as “controlled entirely by sapient beings.”

OOC: And it's vague enough that you could count an autonomous drone's code having been written by sapients as being "controlled entirely" by them...
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Cretox State
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1027
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Cretox State » Fri Jun 12, 2020 9:53 am

Araraukar wrote:
Cretox State wrote:OOC: “Protection of Airspace” defines aircraft as “controlled entirely by sapient beings.”

OOC: And it's vague enough that you could count an autonomous drone's code having been written by sapients as being "controlled entirely" by them...

OOC: The direct control of the moment-to-moment behavior of the aircraft would still come down to automated systems. This proposal would also fix the ambiguity in the definition of "airspace" and clarify on a few things. I would appreciate if someone with more authority on the matter could comment about the "controlled entirely" bit, though.
Last edited by Cretox State on Fri Jun 12, 2020 9:53 am, edited 2 times in total.
GA/SC/Issues author. Public Servant. Killer of Stats. Thought Leader. Influencer. P20 Laureate. Delegate Emeritus of thousands of regions.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bisofeyr, Comfed, Varnash

Advertisement

Remove ads