[DRAFT] Repeal GA#37 (Fairness in Criminal Trials)

[Bananaistan]

OOC: How is the stuff regarding " governmental or charitable mechanisms" not an HM?

Two sections above the "governmental or charitable mechanisms" is a clause which states "INSISTS that the accused be permitted expert representation by a professional versed in the area of law concerned". If there's no charitable mechanism and the government doesn't step in, then there can be no trial and there's no problem: no trial and no compromised right to counsel.

Edit: Also, the singular other argument is poor. What exactly is the problem with military trials that the target blocks?

[Conservative Republic Of Huang]

OOC: How is the stuff regarding " governmental or charitable mechanisms" not an HM?

Two sections above the "governmental or charitable mechanisms" is a clause which states "INSISTS that the accused be permitted expert representation by a professional versed in the area of law concerned". If there's no charitable mechanism and the government doesn't step in, then there can be no trial and there's no problem: no trial and no compromised right to counsel.

Edit: Also, the singular other argument is poor. What exactly is the problem with military trials that the target blocks?

OOC: I interpreted the line from GA #37 narrowly, as simply precluding the government from preventing the defendant to retain counsel.

The system of military justice that at least one nation uses is a three-tiered system, of which the lowest level, summary court martial, does not obligate the government to provide counsel.