Advertisement
by Thousand Branches » Thu Dec 16, 2021 2:22 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Thu Dec 16, 2021 3:22 pm
Thousand Branches wrote:Okay so hypothetically, if I went through the rules post and corrected all the errors in one post, could I get all of it fixed at once? That seems like it might be the easiest solution considering the busyness of the mods.
by Thousand Branches » Thu Dec 16, 2021 3:23 pm
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Thousand Branches wrote:Okay so hypothetically, if I went through the rules post and corrected all the errors in one post, could I get all of it fixed at once? That seems like it might be the easiest solution considering the busyness of the mods.
Probably not, because everyone would complain and then de facto require you to explain and justify each change individually.
by Imperium Anglorum » Thu Dec 16, 2021 3:29 pm
Thousand Branches wrote:Imperium Anglorum wrote:Probably not, because everyone would complain and then de facto require you to explain and justify each change individually.
I can do that tbf. I can post a whole topic about it if people really care. I figured typos/bad phrasing was just easy fixes but I suppose it is a rules post
by Thousand Branches » Thu Dec 16, 2021 3:37 pm
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Thousand Branches wrote:I can do that tbf. I can post a whole topic about it if people really care. I figured typos/bad phrasing was just easy fixes but I suppose it is a rules post
I exaggerated when I said 11 months. It actually took 8 months or so. viewtopic.php?f=9&t=423294.
by WayNeacTia » Thu Dec 16, 2021 4:18 pm
Thousand Branches wrote:Imperium Anglorum wrote:I exaggerated when I said 11 months. It actually took 8 months or so. viewtopic.php?f=9&t=423294.
…wtf. In that case an alternate solution would just be to provide my edits, place them in a topic, and revise as people comment one way or the other. Whether people want one solution over another, there should still be fixes when actual grammatical errors appear in an official rules post. A discussion on such a thing might not be so bad.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Thousand Branches » Thu Dec 16, 2021 4:30 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Thousand Branches wrote:…wtf. In that case an alternate solution would just be to provide my edits, place them in a topic, and revise as people comment one way or the other. Whether people want one solution over another, there should still be fixes when actual grammatical errors appear in an official rules post. A discussion on such a thing might not be so bad.
You do understand that herding cats would be easier, and more likely to actually achieve a result?
by Thamesholm and Wallborough » Fri Dec 17, 2021 7:29 am
by Wallenburg » Fri Dec 17, 2021 10:17 am
Thamesholm and Wallborough wrote:Are there any laws against the state education system indoctrinating children to support a particular political party, religion etcetera?
by Untecna » Fri Dec 17, 2021 10:18 am
by Thamesholm and Wallborough » Fri Dec 17, 2021 10:20 am
Assuming the content of the question, I would assume this proposal idea of theirs would be focused on keeping children away from "leftist" ideas.
by Imperium Anglorum » Fri Dec 17, 2021 10:29 am
by Thamesholm and Wallborough » Fri Dec 17, 2021 10:42 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:When the school teaches you that the world is round, is that indoctrination? Next, what is leftism or rightism? How can we put any meaningful definition of those terms into law?
by Imperium Anglorum » Fri Dec 17, 2021 10:48 am
Thamesholm and Wallborough wrote:Imperium Anglorum wrote:When the school teaches you that the world is round, is that indoctrination? Next, what is leftism or rightism? How can we put any meaningful definition of those terms into law?
Teaching the world is round is a fact. It is an is statement (as opposed to an ought statement) and is provable.
Thamesholm and Wallborough wrote:Can politicians demand that schools teach children to support their political party?
Thamesholm and Wallborough wrote:Is there any WA laws on freedom of conscience and do these apply to minors?
by Thamesholm and Wallborough » Sat Dec 18, 2021 8:27 am
by Graintfjall » Sat Dec 18, 2021 8:31 am
by Thamesholm and Wallborough » Sat Dec 18, 2021 8:48 am
Graintfjall wrote:Not particularly. The word "reasonable" is almost always completely useless, and in this particular case it doesn't seem to mean anything at all.
by Graintfjall » Sat Dec 18, 2021 9:14 am
by Thamesholm and Wallborough » Sat Dec 18, 2021 9:44 am
Graintfjall wrote:You're going to try to RP? Yeah, good luck with that.
by Thamesholm and Wallborough » Sun Dec 19, 2021 10:33 am
by Wallenburg » Sun Dec 19, 2021 7:04 pm
Thamesholm and Wallborough wrote:Is life without parole allowed as a punishment under WA Law?
by Thamesholm and Wallborough » Thu Dec 23, 2021 9:01 am
by Bears Armed » Thu Dec 23, 2021 9:29 am
Thamesholm and Wallborough wrote:Is it the letter, the spirt or both of WA resolutions that are binding on member states?
by Sierra Lyricalia » Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:25 am
Bears Armed wrote:As people (including Mods, and nowadays GenSec, when ruling on the legality of Repeal attempts) have been saying around here for a lonng time "The law dies what the law says".
by Bears Armed » Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:30 am
Sierra Lyricalia wrote:Bears Armed wrote:As people (including Mods, and nowadays GenSec, when ruling on the legality of Repeal attempts) have been saying around here for a lonng time "The law dies what the law says".
Well, repeals certainly make die the law they say!
</ that @#$%ing jerk who laughs at everyone's typos>
"The law does what the law says" is indeed a widely accepted maxim.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Simone Republic, Sirian
Advertisement