I ought also note that a contradiction rule exists. "Proposals which conflict with explicit clauses within an active resolution will be removed."
Advertisement
by Imperium Anglorum » Tue Dec 20, 2016 12:12 pm
by Bakhton » Thu Jan 05, 2017 5:59 am
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Jan 05, 2017 6:07 am
Bakhton wrote:Is the GenSec an IC organization?
by Araraukar » Thu Jan 05, 2017 6:17 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Bears Armed Mission » Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:27 am
Araraukar wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:Not in effect. I guess you could refer to it a the Secretariat, the way we historically referred to the mods.
I still use "Secretariat" for mods, since they're still the ones that actually remove the proposals. Though I've taken to advicing newbies entirely OOCly.
Mind you, I don't see why GenSec couldn't be mentioned in IC. We could just pretend you guys are a bunch of gnomes....
by Kitzerland » Thu Jan 05, 2017 5:10 pm
by States of Glory WA Office » Thu Jan 05, 2017 5:14 pm
Kitzerland wrote:What do the terms "NatSov" and "IntFed" mean?
by Araraukar » Thu Jan 05, 2017 6:01 pm
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Christian Democrats » Thu Jan 05, 2017 7:40 pm
Kitzerland wrote:What do the terms "NatSov" and "IntFed" mean?
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Bakhton » Thu Jan 05, 2017 8:23 pm
Araraukar wrote:States of Glory WA Office wrote:'National Sovereigntist' and 'International Federalist'. They basically mean nothing nowadays.
In very general terms NatSov people think everything (or almost everything) should be left to the nations to decide for themselves. IntFed people (I don't know if we actually have any of these around anymore, everyone's more or less NatSov) on the other hand think that most things would be best legislated upon internationally with only minor things being left up to the nations themselves.
by Araraukar » Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:13 pm
Bakhton wrote:What happened the IntFed? Burn out?
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by The Atlae Isles » Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:46 pm
Araraukar wrote:Bakhton wrote:What happened the IntFed? Burn out?
You'd have to ask them. I can't remember who played on that side. But even NatSov is now... Well, way back when IntFed and NatSov were considered to be the polar opposites. Now most people around go for "reasonable NatSov", which might be summed up as "deal with international issues with international laws and national issues with national laws". Of course arguments abound about what counts as an international issue, and that's why it's the most commonly asked question on new drafts...
by Bakhton » Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:54 pm
The Atlae Isles wrote:Araraukar wrote:You'd have to ask them. I can't remember who played on that side. But even NatSov is now... Well, way back when IntFed and NatSov were considered to be the polar opposites. Now most people around go for "reasonable NatSov", which might be summed up as "deal with international issues with international laws and national issues with national laws". Of course arguments abound about what counts as an international issue, and that's why it's the most commonly asked question on new drafts...
Well, people say to some extreme drafts as: "Oh, NatSovers aren't going to like that." Are anybody ever going to say, "Oh, IntFeders aren't going to like that" to anything?
by The Atlae Isles » Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:56 pm
by Araraukar » Fri Jan 06, 2017 1:22 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Kitzerland » Fri Jan 06, 2017 6:59 am
The Atlae Isles wrote:Araraukar wrote:You'd have to ask them. I can't remember who played on that side. But even NatSov is now... Well, way back when IntFed and NatSov were considered to be the polar opposites. Now most people around go for "reasonable NatSov", which might be summed up as "deal with international issues with international laws and national issues with national laws". Of course arguments abound about what counts as an international issue, and that's why it's the most commonly asked question on new drafts...
Well, people say to some extreme drafts as: "Oh, NatSovers aren't going to like that." Are anybody ever going to say, "Oh, IntFeders aren't going to like that" to anything?
by Frustrated Franciscans » Fri Jan 06, 2017 12:18 pm
Bakhton wrote:What happened the IntFed? Burn out?
by Bears Armed » Sat Jan 07, 2017 5:30 am
Araraukar wrote:Bakhton wrote:What happened the IntFed? Burn out?
You'd have to ask them. I can't remember who played on that side. But even NatSov is now... Well, way back when IntFed and NatSov were considered to be the polar opposites. Now most people around go for "reasonable NatSov", which might be summed up as "deal with international issues with international laws and national issues with national laws". Of course arguments abound about what counts as an international issue, and that's why it's the most commonly asked question on new drafts...
by Bakhton » Mon Jan 09, 2017 10:34 pm
by Christian Democrats » Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:49 pm
Bakhton wrote:What's the worst resolution that's ever been passed?
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Wallenburg » Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:26 am
by Araraukar » Tue Jan 10, 2017 2:37 am
Bakhton wrote:What's the worst resolution that's ever been passed?
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Frustrated Franciscans » Tue Jan 10, 2017 7:54 am
by Araraukar » Tue Jan 10, 2017 11:04 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Separatist Peoples » Tue Jan 10, 2017 11:06 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: The Overmind
Advertisement