NATION

PASSWORD

[Draft] Prevention of Arms Races

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Glurponia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 41
Founded: Mar 28, 2017
Ex-Nation

[Draft] Prevention of Arms Races

Postby Glurponia » Tue Apr 28, 2020 10:40 am

Category: Global Disarmament // Strength: Significant

The General Assembly,

Making note of the many needless deaths and misery that war causes,

Acknowledging the tendency of nations to fund their military highly in fear of said misery occurring to their people,

Keeping in mind that the re-armament of a neighbor often inspires nations to boost their own armed forces out of a desire not to get left behind,

Realizing that the aforementioned practice may lead to a vicious cycle known as an arms race in which two countries each channel more and more money out of public works and into military growth in order to protect against the other's aggression,

hereby

Defines an arms race as a phenomenon in which two rival nations each pour money into military development in order to outwit the other's military development;

Emphasizes that arms races have only negative effects on civilians of the affected nations due to decreased funding for education and public works;

Creates an impartial, international law enforcement body to investigate and recognize when arms races are occurring throughout the world;

Gives this body the power to invoke World Assembly authority and force the guilty parties to demobilize.


The Tri-Planetary Coalition. A medium power on the galactic stage, with the internal squabbles you might expect from three different species with no shared history at all. It seems to work, however, as our many exports and intellectual wealth fund the highest quality of living this side of Central.
Glurponia uses NS stats and more or less represents my political views. Alternatively, here's my Political Compass

User avatar
Morover
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1557
Founded: Oct 14, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Morover » Tue Apr 28, 2020 10:45 am

OOC:

It would seem that this contradicts GAR#2, which states that "the World Assembly as a body maintains neutrality in matters of civil and international strife. As such, the WA will not engage in commanding, organising, ratifying, denouncing, or otherwise participating in armed conflicts, police actions, or military activities under the WA banner."
World Assembly Author
ns.morover@gmail.com

User avatar
Libertas Omnium Maximus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 610
Founded: May 31, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Libertas Omnium Maximus » Tue Apr 28, 2020 10:46 am

Glurponia wrote:Category: Global Disarmament // Strength: Significant

The General Assembly,

Making note of the many needless deaths and misery that war causes,

Acknowledging the tendency of nations to fund their military highly in fear of said misery occurring to their people,

Keeping in mind that the re-armament of a neighbor often inspires nations to boost their own armed forces out of a desire not to get left behind,

Realizing that the aforementioned practice may lead to a vicious cycle known as an arms race in which two countries each channel more and more money out of public works and into military growth in order to protect against the other's aggression,

hereby

Defines an arms race as a phenomenon in which two rival nations each pour money into military development in order to outwit the other's military development;

Emphasizes that arms races have only negative effects on civilians of the affected nations due to decreased funding for education and public works;

Creates an impartial, international law enforcement body to investigate and recognize when arms races are occurring throughout the world;

Gives this body the power to invoke World Assembly authority and force the guilty parties to demobilize.


"Ambassador, it's my understanding that the WA may not suppress the growth of a sovereign state's military. In fact, the right of states to possess and operate nuclear weapons is enshrined in international law. Please correct me if I am mistaken.
The Republic of Libertas Omnium Maximus
(Representative Democracy; Established 1837)
The Litudinem Herald|NationStates Resume|Libertas Omnium Maximus Wiki

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22872
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Tue Apr 28, 2020 10:48 am

Military development and mobilization are two extremely different things. Regardless of other issues, requiring member states to demobilize during a period of military tension is extremely dangerous.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Libertas Omnium Maximus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 610
Founded: May 31, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Libertas Omnium Maximus » Tue Apr 28, 2020 10:49 am

"In short, Ambassador, your proposal has no basis for existence. I'm sorry to say it."
The Republic of Libertas Omnium Maximus
(Representative Democracy; Established 1837)
The Litudinem Herald|NationStates Resume|Libertas Omnium Maximus Wiki

User avatar
Kenmoria
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 7914
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Kenmoria » Tue Apr 28, 2020 1:21 pm

Libertas Omnium Maximus wrote:
Glurponia wrote:Category: Global Disarmament // Strength: Significant

The General Assembly,

Making note of the many needless deaths and misery that war causes,

Acknowledging the tendency of nations to fund their military highly in fear of said misery occurring to their people,

Keeping in mind that the re-armament of a neighbor often inspires nations to boost their own armed forces out of a desire not to get left behind,

Realizing that the aforementioned practice may lead to a vicious cycle known as an arms race in which two countries each channel more and more money out of public works and into military growth in order to protect against the other's aggression,

hereby

Defines an arms race as a phenomenon in which two rival nations each pour money into military development in order to outwit the other's military development;

Emphasizes that arms races have only negative effects on civilians of the affected nations due to decreased funding for education and public works;

Creates an impartial, international law enforcement body to investigate and recognize when arms races are occurring throughout the world;

Gives this body the power to invoke World Assembly authority and force the guilty parties to demobilize.


"Ambassador, it's my understanding that the WA may not suppress the growth of a sovereign state's military. In fact, the right of states to possess and operate nuclear weapons is enshrined in international law. Please correct me if I am mistaken.

“The WA is allowed to suppress the growth of a state’s military in many ways, and has indeed done so in several past resolution. Furthermore, the Nuclear Arms Protection Act does not restrict the WA from imposing restrictions on nuclear weapons, and doesn’t appear to contradict this proposal.

However, there are issues with GA #002. It seems debatable whether there is contradiction, so would be helpful if others could weigh in on whether there is an issue.”
Hello! I’m a GAer and NS Roleplayer from the United Kingdom.
My pronouns are he/him.
Any posts that I make as GenSec will be clearly marked as such and OOC. Conversely, my IC ambassador in the General Assembly is Ambassador Fortier. I’m always happy to discuss ideas about proposals, particularly if grammar or wording are in issue. I am also Executive Deputy Minister for the WA Ministry of TNP.
Kenmoria is an illiberal yet democratic nation pursuing the goals of communism in a semi-effective fashion. It has a very broad diplomatic presence despite being economically developing, mainly to seek help in recovering from the effect of a recent civil war. Read the factbook here for more information; perhaps, I will eventually finish it.

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Tue Apr 28, 2020 1:35 pm

Emphasizes that arms races have only negative effects on civilians of the affected nations due to decreased funding for education and public works;

IC: “Only negative effects”. Jobs. Lots of jobs building things. And building things in support of things. They may not be the jobs you like because “oh no, military!”, but not everybody thinks like that.

Creates an impartial, international law enforcement body to investigate and recognize when arms races are occurring throughout the world;

OOC: GenSec hat on. No, automatic illegality. No WA police.

Gives this body the power to invoke World Assembly authority and force the guilty parties to demobilize.

IC: You may want to look up the difference between an “arms race” and “demobilize”, because the two are not even remotely similar.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Libertas Omnium Maximus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 610
Founded: May 31, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Libertas Omnium Maximus » Tue Apr 28, 2020 3:39 pm

Kenmoria wrote:
Libertas Omnium Maximus wrote:
"Ambassador, it's my understanding that the WA may not suppress the growth of a sovereign state's military. In fact, the right of states to possess and operate nuclear weapons is enshrined in international law. Please correct me if I am mistaken.

“The WA is allowed to suppress the growth of a state’s military in many ways, and has indeed done so in several past resolution. Furthermore, the Nuclear Arms Protection Act does not restrict the WA from imposing restrictions on nuclear weapons, and doesn’t appear to contradict this proposal.

However, there are issues with GA #002. It seems debatable whether there is contradiction, so would be helpful if others could weigh in on whether there is an issue.”


"In that case, I respectfully retract my earlier statement."
Last edited by Libertas Omnium Maximus on Tue Apr 28, 2020 3:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Republic of Libertas Omnium Maximus
(Representative Democracy; Established 1837)
The Litudinem Herald|NationStates Resume|Libertas Omnium Maximus Wiki

User avatar
Estlandic Ethnostate
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Apr 24, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Estlandic Ethnostate » Mon May 04, 2020 10:15 am

The nation of Estland does what it wants and what is in the best interest of the Estlandic State and its people.

User avatar
BlackLight Covenant
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 138
Founded: Apr 24, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby BlackLight Covenant » Mon May 04, 2020 2:07 pm

" 'Scuse me, ambassador, but how do ya propose that this would work when one of them guilty parties is a non-WA member? General Assembly can't force 'em to do anythin' if they ain't a member, beyond perhaps sendin' a strongly-worded letter, but who reads those, anyway? Seems to me like yer proposal might be overextendin' a bit with that one. Might wanna rewrite that clause to only include WA members, unless ya want a lot of ridiculin' spam mail from non-members to flood the WA's archives."

"Regardless, though, I ain't seein' much of a positive side to this proposal of yers. Any member state stuck in an arms race with a non-member would be forced to stop their build-up, puttin' 'em at a real disadvantage against that non-member, and considerin' our own experience with the galaxy our nation happens to be in, such a disadvantage is unacceptable to say the least. We're not gonna sacrifice our colonies and fleets just because of some vague need to stop arms races, ambassador."

With a swift motion, ambassador Lovik tossed the proposal onto a pile of papers labelled "minor security threats", before retrieving a metal paperweight in the shape of one of the spaceborne navy's destroyers from one of the drawers next to her, and placing it on top of the pile, the desk creaking underneath the thing's weight. "What is it with these blasted bureaucrats and forgettin' that non-member threats exist?" she whispered under her breath.

Blacklight is an isolationist, and notably xenophobic, interstellar corporatocracy.
Its government and society are made up of three massive conglomerates.
They maintain joint control over affairs normal governments would otherwise be concerned with.

Ellen Lovik
- Secondary Multiversal Ambassador
- 2nd Corporate Representative to the World Assembly, currently replacing Dietrich Latvala
- Mentally mildly stuck in the mindset of her time as riot control officer



Currently the most general officer of generic things, common issues, and standard matters for The Glorious Nations of Iwaku, and Observer of Intergalactic Law as The Armada of Refuge for Eientei Gensokyo!


User avatar
Waldenes
Attaché
 
Posts: 76
Founded: Mar 10, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Waldenes » Mon May 04, 2020 2:56 pm

“I concur with the ambassador from Blacklight. Waldenes is a pacifist nation. We empathize with the desire to see the idea of war fall away completely and become nothing more than an artifact of barbaric by-gone times- but how would we enforce this outside of the World Assembly, ambassador?”


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Saint Alphonsus, The Overmind

Advertisement

Remove ads