Wayneactia wrote:This resolution (and I use that term very loosely)
OOC: No need to be rude, mate. There's a way to express your opinions without trashing me or my work.
"If it is really such a given, then certainly it's not a problem to ensure that it is done uniformly? You made false assertations that ESSU would be creating an entirely new committee which would cost 'trillions of dollars' when in reality EPARC was already in existence and you assert yourself that most, if not all, health programs already clean their syringes, so there is absolutely no way it could cost them more money. And allow me to clarify--it is not just a single nation that could compromise the entire international community. In fact, a single health corporation operating outside the purview of a nation's regulatory powers choosing to cut costs and reuse syringes a few times (OOC: as some did, especially in The Netherlands in the 70s iirc), could decimate the international community as well. And before you tell me there's some "reasonable corporation theory", there is a section of GA proposals dedicated to corporate regulation so yes, this resolution was worthwhile and did improve patient health, whether you'd like to believe it or not."
Tinhampton wrote:Ensuring Safe Syringe Use was passed 13,592 votes to 2,041.Well played!
"Thank you! And thank you to everyone who approved and voted for the resolution and especially helped me write it. I could not have done this without your help, and it was an enjoyable experience. Ararukar, Terttia, and Kenmoria especially--thank you each very much."