by Team Red Dragon » Mon Nov 18, 2019 7:29 pm
by Grays Harbor » Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:34 pm
by Team Red Dragon » Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:47 pm
by Team Red Dragon » Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:50 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:First, post the name of the proposal in the thread title. “Thoughts on my draft?” tells nobody anything.
Second, it looks substantially like a duplication of resolution 357, Promotion of Clean Energy
But, good you put it here first and didn’t just submit.
by Araraukar » Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:08 pm
Team Red Dragon wrote:Also do you think I should completely scrap this whole proposal? Or should I simply edit it to not resemble Resolution Number 357?
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Team Red Dragon » Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:19 pm
by Grays Harbor » Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:45 pm
by Team Red Dragon » Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:50 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:NS =/= Earth or the USA. There are tens of thousands of nations on thousands of worlds.
by Cruel Giny » Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:56 pm
by Grays Harbor » Tue Nov 19, 2019 6:14 pm
Team Red Dragon wrote:1. The growing problem of drastic climate changes in the world
We are not all on the same “world”. There are thousands of planets. One size does not fit all.
4. I believe that Resolution Number 375 does not cover or go into more detail, taxing non-renewable resources for the benefit of a country's economy while helping the environment.
raise taxes on ”non renewables”. This will raise the cost of energy. Energy usage goes down. Expected tax revenue goes down. That helps a country ... how? Help the environment at the cost of Bankrupting the populace, and setting the economy back a century or more. Well, I guess mass starvation would put less of a burden on the environment.
by Team Red Dragon » Tue Nov 19, 2019 6:59 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Team Red Dragon wrote:1. The growing problem of drastic climate changes in the world
We are not all on the same “world”. There are thousands of planets. One size does not fit all.
4. I believe that Resolution Number 375 does not cover or go into more detail, taxing non-renewable resources for the benefit of a country's economy while helping the environment.
raise taxes on ”non renewables”. This will raise the cost of energy. Energy usage goes down. Expected tax revenue goes down. That helps a country ... how? Help the environment at the cost of Bankrupting the populace, and setting the economy back a century or more. Well, I guess mass starvation would put less of a burden on the environment.
by Team Red Dragon » Tue Nov 19, 2019 7:02 pm
by Kenmoria » Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:37 am
by Team Red Dragon » Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:30 pm
Kenmoria wrote:“What is the category and strength of this proposal?”
by Grays Harbor » Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:54 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:First, post the name of the proposal in the thread title. “Thoughts on my draft?” tells nobody anything.
.
by Team Red Dragon » Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:58 pm
by Araraukar » Thu Nov 21, 2019 6:33 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by The New Nordic Union » Thu Nov 21, 2019 6:37 am
Araraukar wrote:OOC: Doesn't NEF ban national taxation meddling mandates?
by Liberimery » Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:04 pm
Araraukar wrote:OOC: Doesn't NEF ban national taxation meddling mandates?
by Team Red Dragon » Thu Nov 21, 2019 5:51 pm
by Grays Harbor » Thu Nov 21, 2019 6:40 pm
8. Affirms the right of member nations to maintain full authority over domestic taxation policies, barring those that may include unfair discriminatory practices;
by Terttia » Thu Nov 21, 2019 7:29 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:From Resolution #178. Affirms the right of member nations to maintain full authority over domestic taxation policies, barring those that may include unfair discriminatory practices;
by Kenmoria » Fri Nov 22, 2019 12:35 am
Team Red Dragon wrote:What other things should I do to my draft?
by Team Red Dragon » Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:02 am
by Team Red Dragon » Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:04 am
Kenmoria wrote:Team Red Dragon wrote:What other things should I do to my draft?
(OOC: Due to the aforementioned contradiction issue with GA #017, you will unfortunately have to either abandon or completely change your proposal. If the former, then you should change the [ABANDONED]. If you think it is possible for you to have a proposal that doesn’t at all affect tax, then you can continue drafting,)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement