Advertisement
by Ratateague » Fri Oct 18, 2019 10:37 am
by Imperium Anglorum » Fri Oct 18, 2019 10:41 am
by Marxist Germany » Fri Oct 18, 2019 10:52 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:That isn't good faith compliance.
by Imperium Anglorum » Fri Oct 18, 2019 10:56 am
by Marxist Germany » Fri Oct 18, 2019 10:59 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:I fail to see how weaselly language is good faith compliance. But even so, the actions of such a board can be reviewed or regulated by the Compliance Commission.
by Imperium Anglorum » Fri Oct 18, 2019 11:03 am
by Wallenburg » Fri Oct 18, 2019 11:10 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:That isn't good faith compliance.
by Araraukar » Fri Oct 18, 2019 11:12 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:On the other hand, when the proposal says independent, it doesn't mean 'subject to the discretion of a national policy maker'.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Imperium Anglorum » Fri Oct 18, 2019 11:31 am
by Marxist Germany » Fri Oct 18, 2019 11:35 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Mobile.
Re IndEPendENT boDiES cANNot eXIsT. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indepen ... government
Re secondary legislation. I would imagine a similar thing when it comes to the greenhouse gas resolution, as I know not what particular level is desired by the committee and therefore, the particular cost of abatement. Secondary legislation is a common legislative practice, and the scope of the secondary legislator's discretion is well limited to enforcement and clarification.
by Kenmoria » Fri Oct 18, 2019 11:35 am
Ratateague wrote:Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I was under the impression from bills in years past that resolutions without mandating language and the sole purpose of creating a committee were not allowed?
by Imperium Anglorum » Fri Oct 18, 2019 11:52 am
by Ratateague » Fri Oct 18, 2019 1:12 pm
Marxist Germany wrote:Imperium Anglorum wrote:Mobile.
Re IndEPendENT boDiES cANNot eXIsT. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indepen ... government
Re secondary legislation. I would imagine a similar thing when it comes to the greenhouse gas resolution, as I know not what particular level is desired by the committee and therefore, the particular cost of abatement. Secondary legislation is a common legislative practice, and the scope of the secondary legislator's discretion is well limited to enforcement and clarification.
OOC: So lets just assign all legislative matters to the gnomes, and lets remove the committee only rule because committees are better at writing up legislation than us.
by Marxist Germany » Fri Oct 18, 2019 1:54 pm
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Mobile. Re MG: Not sure why that's a disad. But that was a conclusion I reached perhaps three years ago. It isn't a particularly novel idea, in fact, it's a logical inevitability of the GA assumption of perfect Committee operation.
The only real argument against it is that doing that wouldn't be fun, but given the allergy the modern assembly seems to have to policy work, I'm not sure how that is a particularly solvent advocacy.
by Separatist Peoples » Fri Oct 18, 2019 3:12 pm
Marxist Germany wrote:Imperium Anglorum wrote:Mobile. Re MG: Not sure why that's a disad. But that was a conclusion I reached perhaps three years ago. It isn't a particularly novel idea, in fact, it's a logical inevitability of the GA assumption of perfect Committee operation.
The only real argument against it is that doing that wouldn't be fun, but given the allergy the modern assembly seems to have to policy work, I'm not sure how that is a particularly solvent advocacy.
OOC: The problem is that this defeats the whole purpose of the WA, why waste everyones time when the gnomes can do it for them?
by Kenmoria » Fri Oct 18, 2019 3:44 pm
Marxist Germany wrote:Imperium Anglorum wrote:Mobile. Re MG: Not sure why that's a disad. But that was a conclusion I reached perhaps three years ago. It isn't a particularly novel idea, in fact, it's a logical inevitability of the GA assumption of perfect Committee operation.
The only real argument against it is that doing that wouldn't be fun, but given the allergy the modern assembly seems to have to policy work, I'm not sure how that is a particularly solvent advocacy.
OOC: The problem is that this defeats the whole purpose of the WA, why waste everyones time when the gnomes can do it for them?
by Forensatha » Fri Oct 18, 2019 4:21 pm
by Cantonese Union » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:58 pm
1. It is unlawful in all member nations to sterilise, in any way, a person below the age of majority or any incompetent person, without the approval of an independent Institutional Review Board, which has certified after review, the necessity of sterilisation for the long-term health of that person.
Ban on Sterilisation of Minors etc
by Morover » Fri Oct 18, 2019 6:11 pm
Cantonese Union wrote:We have decided to vote against this resolution to protect our national interests, however we have a question about the nature of this proposal.
We apologize if you've answered a similar question before, but how does this:1. It is unlawful in all member nations to sterilise, in any way, a person below the age of majority or any incompetent person, without the approval of an independent Institutional Review Board, which has certified after review, the necessity of sterilisation for the long-term health of that person.
equalBan on Sterilisation of Minors etc
For example, if the aforementioned Institutional Review Board approves every sterilization request (or a majority), how will sterilizations be "banned"?
by Bear Connors Paradiso » Fri Oct 18, 2019 6:46 pm
by Radicalania » Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:22 am
"Martyn, I thought you quit?
-Everyone, 2019, 2021, 2023
by Bears Armed » Sat Oct 19, 2019 2:59 am
Kenmoria wrote:Marxist Germany wrote:OOC: The problem is that this defeats the whole purpose of the WA, why waste everyones time when the gnomes can do it for them?
(OOC: It’s a quirk of the General Assembly, and one that authors are allowed to readily take advantage of, precisely so that member nations have to do less.)
by Marxist Germany » Sat Oct 19, 2019 3:19 am
by Kenmoria » Sat Oct 19, 2019 3:29 am
Radicalania wrote:Didnt realise it was legal to give a GA resolution a misleading title. However I hope y'all will vote for my new "Ban Killing Kids Act" which has a clause meaning you can only kill kids with permission from the Ministry of Killing Kids.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Oct 19, 2019 3:34 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement