Advertisement
by Separatist Peoples » Tue Apr 30, 2019 5:25 pm
by Gebietersland » Tue Apr 30, 2019 5:34 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:OOC: Can promise this will be stomped. Not the least of which is because I will actively campaign to see it done.
by Araraukar » Tue Apr 30, 2019 7:19 pm
Gebietersland wrote:"I regret our inability to reach a consensus, and I respect, though do not agree with, your viewpoint and decision. Thank you for your consideration of my repeal proposal and best of luck"
Gebietersland wrote:if "those people" refers to
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Gebietersland » Tue Apr 30, 2019 8:17 pm
Araraukar wrote:Gebietersland wrote:"I regret our inability to reach a consensus, and I respect, though do not agree with, your viewpoint and decision. Thank you for your consideration of my repeal proposal and best of luck"
IC: "Consensus on this topic has been reached very many times already, ambassador, and always it comes down to "we don't want this resolution repealed". Just because you do not agree with it, does not mean the consensus had not been reached by the majority."Gebietersland wrote:if "those people" refers to
OOC: You objected to "you people". Also, I checked, the last credible attempt that had the best chance of success, on this repeal, received 82.7% against. Most often they don't event get to vote, because they're aggressively campaigned against by people who don't want the abortion debate to invade GA again.
"You people" and "those people" in this particular case are the ones who futilely hit their heads against a wall in the belief that the wall will cave in before their head does. And who thus get profiled by the rest of the WA as people who encourage denying the right to bodily from half the species (never mind that the other half is needed for there to be a pregnancy in the first place). That will hurt your credibility on any other project as well.
If you truly want to make things work for you in GA, then for the love of little green dragons, don't bang your head against this wall. The wall will win.
by Araraukar » Tue Apr 30, 2019 8:24 pm
Gebietersland wrote:However, the 82.7% against was of a resolution put through a vote around 2 years ago, so general demographics might have changed
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Gebietersland » Tue Apr 30, 2019 8:40 pm
Araraukar wrote:Gebietersland wrote:However, the 82.7% against was of a resolution put through a vote around 2 years ago, so general demographics might have changed
OOC: When the resolution originally passed, it only got like 68% for. That means that it gained 14% more of the voters in 3 years (when that repeal failed). I doubt it has magically lost over 30% in the last 2. Given the rise of gender equality in marriages and all similar advancements in people's rights and freedoms in the recent years, I really can't see the vote going any other way now either. Not even when the trolls come out of the woodworks with NS Summer.
by Araraukar » Tue Apr 30, 2019 8:49 pm
Gebietersland wrote:and, subsequently, retract from this issue and salvage what's left of my reputation.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Wallenburg » Tue Apr 30, 2019 9:08 pm
by Volkenreich » Tue Apr 30, 2019 9:09 pm
by Gebietersland » Tue Apr 30, 2019 9:24 pm
Volkenreich wrote:I'd vote for it if it used less wedge issue based language.
by Kenmoria » Tue Apr 30, 2019 11:37 pm
by Gebietersland » Wed May 01, 2019 6:57 am
Kenmoria wrote:Gebietersland wrote:
Do you mean that I should tone down the language and use a more moderated vocabulary?
(OOC: Some repeal resolutions and proposals have had much more ‘wedge’ vocabulary; this looks quite mild in comparison.Araraukar wrote:OOC: Stick around. You have potential.
Also, I completely agree with this. Your first proposal was legal and actually looked like a law, which is a lot better than some others. If you have a different target, you could be successful.)
by Marxist Germany » Wed May 01, 2019 8:05 am
by Reploid Productions » Wed May 01, 2019 12:30 pm
Tinfect wrote:OOC:
<snip for brevity>
Tinfect wrote:There is no compromise. A compromise to you people, is only ruining some people's lives, and I will not have it. There is no 'moderate majority' on this; the very idea is laughable.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Kager South, Kreushia, Muffinses
Advertisement