The republic of Jackalopetopia wrote:Untecna wrote:First, welcome. Please make drafts in the proper place, as this thread is for ideas.
Second, not of international importance.
Third, probably illegal.
1. sorry. where should I post drafts?
2. please clarify what you mean by that.
3. why? like I said, I'm very new to this, so any feedback is greatly appreciated.
1. If you are drafting a proposal then it should have a thread of its own -- one thread, for all versions of the draft, preferably with the first post containing the current version of the text and also (in spoilers) any pervious versions -- in this section of the forum.
2. People disagree about how wide the scope of G.A. legislation should be, the extremes being "everything that a national government could" and "only matters where one nation's actions would directly affect other nations". Your proposal clearly falls towards the more inclusive end of that scale*. (It might be opposed, therefore, not only by nations opposed to 'gun control' but also by some nations that already have similar laws themselves but think that these decisions should be made nationally rather than internationally...)
3. Contradiction of existing G.A. legislation, as Tinhampton said in the post just before this one.
_____________________________________________________________________________
* You might see the terms 'IntFed' and 'NatSov' sometimes used in this forum: they are short for 'International Federalist' and 'National Sovereigntist' respectively, reflecting which end of that line a proposal or a nation is seen as closest to.