NATION

PASSWORD

[Abandoned] Ban on Incest

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

[Abandoned] Ban on Incest

Postby Marxist Germany » Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:08 pm

Ban on Incest

Category: Moral Decency | Strength: Mild | Proposed By: Marxist Germany




The World Assembly,

Recognising the right for any individual to marry whom they wish;

Noting that incest should not be gauranteed by this right;

Further Noting the severe implications of incest on the concieved child ranging from cognitive disabilities to neonatal death;

Believing that no child should suffer disabilities due to their parents' poor decisions;

Seeking to prevent any such decisions from occuring;


Hereby,

  1. Defines the following for the purpose of this resolution:
    1. "Incest" as any sexual intercourse performed between two sapients who are either siblings or first cousins;
    2. "Marriage" as any legal relation between two spouses that establishes rights and obligations;
  2. Prohibits member states from legally recognising a marriage between siblings or first cousins;

  3. Mandates that governments ban any form of incest and sanction perpetrators accordingly.

Last edited by Marxist Germany on Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12659
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:12 pm

Incest isn't an actual problem. What is an actual problem is the procreation associated with the incest. One should not be regulating the wrong thing, but rather, prohibiting the thing which is in fact bad. Regulate the procreation associated with it instead of the sexual activity itself.

Also, see Right to Sexual Privacy (viewtopic.php?p=29812469#p29812469) which does this correctly, in 6(a), where it states: "Member states are permitted to establish in law prohibited degrees of consanguinity and may ... criminalise sexual activity between individuals falling within a prohibited degree ... but only to the extent that such sexual activity could result in procreation".
Last edited by Imperium Anglorum on Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:16 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Incest isn't an actual problem. What is an actual problem is the procreation associated with the incest. One should not be regulating the wrong thing, but rather, prohibiting the thing which is in fact bad. Regulate the procreation associated with it instead of the sexual activity itself.

Also, see Right to Sexual Privacy (viewtopic.php?p=29812469#p29812469) which does this correctly, in 6(a), where it states: "Member states are permitted to establish in law prohibited degrees of consanguinity and may ... criminalise sexual activity between individuals falling within a prohibited degree ... but only to the extent that such sexual activity could result in procreation".

OOC:I will add the procreation part, "Member states are Permitted..." they aren't under a mandate to ban incest.

Edit: Its pretty late here, so I'll make the changes tomorrrow along with any other changes suggested.
Last edited by Marxist Germany on Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:52 pm

OOC: This contradicts GAR#383. The WA allows member states to regulate consanguinity between sexual relationships. That precludes the WA from later requiring members ban it.

"Legality issues aside, we oppose this for attempting to regulate domestic marriage. Marriage, by necessity, requires consenting adults. If two consenting siblings, who must be of the age of majority, wish to marry in the C.D.S.P., why the Hezmata do people in Marxist Germany care?"

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:38 am

Separatist Peoples wrote:OOC: This contradicts GAR#383. The WA allows member states to regulate consanguinity between sexual relationships. That precludes the WA from later requiring members ban it.

"Legality issues aside, we oppose this for attempting to regulate domestic marriage. Marriage, by necessity, requires consenting adults. If two consenting siblings, who must be of the age of majority, wish to marry in the C.D.S.P., why the Hezmata do people in Marxist Germany care?"

OOC:Short lived proposal.
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO

User avatar
East Meranopirus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 540
Founded: Jul 28, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby East Meranopirus » Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:57 am

Marxist Germany wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:OOC: This contradicts GAR#383. The WA allows member states to regulate consanguinity between sexual relationships. That precludes the WA from later requiring members ban it.

"Legality issues aside, we oppose this for attempting to regulate domestic marriage. Marriage, by necessity, requires consenting adults. If two consenting siblings, who must be of the age of majority, wish to marry in the C.D.S.P., why the Hezmata do people in Marxist Germany care?"

OOC:Short lived proposal.

Very short-lived proposal. I think the Right to Sexual Privacy resolution (or whatever it's called) has pretty much made sure there won't be any new GA legislation on this area anymore.


Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads