Widowed Land wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:"Legislative intent is irrelevant here, ambassador. GA Resolutions are interpreted textually. Silence is exclusion."
"Now you know what the legislation meant. And I'll make sure to fix it for you and everyone else. Do you have any new opposition to the matter, ambassador?"
OOC: What I think SP was trying to say in IC is that there's a rule of thumb for resolution proposals that goes "the resolution only does what it says it does", meaning that if you want it to do something, you need to actually write the clause you want, into it.
Widowed Land wrote:How come pickpocketers are lethal? or rude people who shout out disrespectful words. They should be detained, but not stripped of their rational right to vote, cause none of them caused a lethal incident
If you're detaining rude people, you're violating at least one if not two WA resoluions. Also, if the pickpocketer steals a diabetic's insulin, it may result in a lethality. But the point remains, if you don't want to lose your rights, don't break the law.
However, something that SP doesn't take into account likely because they're from USA as well and think their system is the normal one, not all inmates are registered as voters in the municipality/county that the prison is in, in all systems. That's how USA does it - inmates are considered to be "permanent residents" in that location - but that doesn't necessarily work like that elsewhere, or in NS multiverse.
Still, like I said, trying to push for prisoner voting rights is going to be an uphill battle. Are you sure that's something you want to tackle?