Sierra Lyricalia wrote:Aureumterra wrote:OOC: Each side only enforces their claims on their side, so the other side is “unenforced”
OOC: So you're still basically encouraging an unregulated gold rush in any locale where there isn't a clear and overwhelming national monopoly on violence. Be aware this might not be super popular.
A note on categories: your preamble talks about the lack of environmental concerns on lifeless rocks, but no operative clause actually deregulates any environmental rules. There's mainly some stuff about the power of commercial actors to act free of interference from pesky little things like property rights or the best interests of the people of the (world, solar system, galaxy, etc.). This looks honestly closest to Free Trade, though you could maybe slot it into Adv. of Ind./CE if you added something to the effect of indemnifying extractors from liability for any actions taken in support of exploiting resources in areas that others have claimed and just, like, expected people not to waltz in like conquistadors "discovering" "new lands."
EDIT:Aureumterra wrote:OOC: Well then, submitted
Oops. Guess you should've waited more than a few hours after "last call."
Yeah, I see the category violation now that is has been made illegal, I’ll withdraw this and change the category