by Republicanana » Sat Feb 23, 2019 9:57 am
by Tinhampton » Sat Feb 23, 2019 9:59 am
Republicanana wrote:WHEREAS, GA #2 is repealed
WHEREAS, there is a major need for a replacement resolution in order to establish rules to the WA again
Hereby, the General Assembly ratifies and accepts this proposed WA Constitution
Article I. The Executive
1. An election will be held every year to name a WA President, which will oversee the enforcement of the resolutions passed by the GA, as well as condemnations, commendations, and liberations the SC will order.
2. Every WA President will be required to have a Vice-President to run with them in the case that they will have to fill that office in the case of a President's removal from office, removal from NS due to inactivity, or resignation
3. The WA President will be allowed to vote on, and propose bills just like any WA member.
4. The WA President can be impeached on the grounds of either a crime or interfering against the wishes of the entire WA by either not enforcing GA or SC action, or allowing for certain nations or regions not to follow GA or SC action.
Article II. The General Assembly
1. The General Assembly (GA) will maintain the same voting apparatus it has now, with every resolution being brought before the full GA in order to be voted on.
2. Members will be added to the process of determining which bills can be brought up to the floor of the GA. This will be due to the establishment of committees to have debate on these bills be extensive before bills hit the floor of the GA
3. The WA Secretariats will take applications and appoint members to the different committees in order to make sure that the best members are on the committee best suited to deal with the laws on that topic.
4. The Committees will be based on the Categories that members can make resolutions on now:
Advancement of Industry
Civil Rights
Education and Creativity
Environmental
Free Trade
Furtherment of Democracy
Global Disarmament
Health
International Security
Moral Decency
Political Stability
Regulation
Social Justice
5. The GA will have a recruitment arm in order to try to get new members to join the WA as part of a welcome telegram similar to what regions have when a nation is founded or refounded.
6. As with actions that SC takes, the resolutions being taken up will come into effect for the entirely of NS, not just WA nations, as WA actions will become the main body for international law.
Article III. Security Council
1. The Security Council (SC) will maintain the majority of the powers it has now, with voting on commendation, condemnation, and liberation resolutions.
2. The Security Council will now have four committees:
Condemnation
Commendation
Liberation
Armed Forces
3. As with the process for establishing committees for the GA, the WA Secretariat will take applications and appoint members to those committees
4. The SC will establish an army in order to both fulfill liberation resolutions and stop any raiders throughout of NS.
5. This army can work in conjunction with regional armies.
PLEASE SUGGEST AMENDMENTS TO THIS RESOLUTION IF YOU WANT TO CHANGE IT.
by The New California Republic » Sat Feb 23, 2019 9:59 am
by Republicanana » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:00 am
The New California Republic wrote:OOC: Metagaming. It tries to change game mechanics, so in its current form it'd likely be highly illegal.
by Kenmoria » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:03 am
by Republicanana » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:06 am
Kenmoria wrote:Republicanana wrote:OOC: I was told that with an repeal of GA #2 all bets were basically off.
(OOC: That is not correct. Repealing GA #2 would open up some avenues that were previously closed, such as a WA military, but wouldn’t remove the game mechanics or metagaming rules. This would still be illegal if GA #2 were repealed.)
by Kenmoria » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:07 am
Republicanana wrote:Kenmoria wrote:(OOC: That is not correct. Repealing GA #2 would open up some avenues that were previously closed, such as a WA military, but wouldn’t remove the game mechanics or metagaming rules. This would still be illegal if GA #2 were repealed.)
OOC: What resolution says that changing game mechanics or metagaming is illegal?
by Separatist Peoples » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:08 am
Republicanana wrote:Kenmoria wrote:(OOC: That is not correct. Repealing GA #2 would open up some avenues that were previously closed, such as a WA military, but wouldn’t remove the game mechanics or metagaming rules. This would still be illegal if GA #2 were repealed.)
OOC: What resolution says that changing game mechanics or metagaming is illegal?
by WA Kitty Kops » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:10 am
Republicanana wrote:OOC: What resolution says that changing game mechanics or metagaming is illegal?
NERVUN wrote:And my life flashed in front of my eyes while I did and I honestly expected my computer to explode after I entered the warning.
by Upper Secundus » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:11 am
by The Democratic Nation of Unovia » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:12 am
by Republicanana » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:14 am
by Republicanana » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:16 am
The Democratic Nation of Unovia wrote:I agree with the sentiments shared here.
Also, what's to say if you had a WA "President", it wouldn't basically be a vehicle for the ones with the most power to execute more power, or where the Gen Sec folks wouldn't use it to basically "Hot Potato" the Presidency between themselves?
Bad idea. Plus, if you were going to write a Constitution (with which I agree in principle), what Nations would go to the Convention, if they had one? What's to say that all Regions would have to adopt their model once it was written, as what happens during Student Government?
by Kenmoria » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:17 am
by Upper Secundus » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:19 am
by Republicanana » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:21 am
by Separatist Peoples » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:25 am
Republicanana wrote:Well, if this is wrong or possibly illegal, they suggest some ideas for some WA reform.
by Borovan3 » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:27 am
by Republicanana » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:27 am
Separatist Peoples wrote:Republicanana wrote:Well, if this is wrong or possibly illegal, they suggest some ideas for some WA reform.
OOC: The kind of reform you seek is not one that the players, GenSec, Mods, or Admins want to enact. Nobody wants a WA executive. Nobody wants to be able to change the game's code by legislative fiat.
by Separatist Peoples » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:28 am
by Republicanana » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:29 am
Borovan3 wrote:Wa secretariat shouldn't have the extra role of appointment people they fine with enforcement rules and impart experience and the sc should be neutral and not establish army. That belongs to defenders. WA president will impact mechanics of game
by Separatist Peoples » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:30 am
Republicanana wrote:Borovan3 wrote:Wa secretariat shouldn't have the extra role of appointment people they fine with enforcement rules and impart experience and the sc should be neutral and not establish army. That belongs to defenders. WA president will impact mechanics of game
1. The WA Secretariats would appoint members to committees to help improve legislation.
2. The army would help fulfill liberation requests.
3. A WA President is needed to help establish order in the WA.
by Republicanana » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:31 am
Separatist Peoples wrote:Republicanana wrote:Why is that?
Because that would either make the game unplayable by concentrating power in a single individual or make the game unplayable by ensuring the admins can't keep up with coding changes.
And Max Barry has been pretty clear that he isn't interested in changing the WA again.
by WA Kitty Kops » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:31 am
Republicanana wrote:3. A WA President is needed to help establish order in the WA.
Republicanana wrote:What if we have an amount of time in the resolution where the WA could not be changed massively again?
NERVUN wrote:And my life flashed in front of my eyes while I did and I honestly expected my computer to explode after I entered the warning.
by Separatist Peoples » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:32 am
Republicanana wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:
Because that would either make the game unplayable by concentrating power in a single individual or make the game unplayable by ensuring the admins can't keep up with coding changes.
And Max Barry has been pretty clear that he isn't interested in changing the WA again.
What if we have an amount of time in the resolution where the WA could not be changed massively again?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement