Iciaros wrote:Hatzisland wrote:
Under the current plan, it probably would. However, there is an intense debate, both among our advisors and on these forums, of whether affirmative action should be outlawed or be given a "compelling practical reason" exemption, and how that would be clarified. We would like to hear your thoughts on that. And as for tightening the allowances, not necessarily, but it does expand the rights to the hiring and firing of workers, along with acceptance into clubs and organizations. And the case you mentioned would most certainly be protected by this plan.
"To be frank, Ambassador, I believe a compelling practical reason exemption would be key to persuading my Empress to allow me to endorse your proposal, as we do have welfare employment programmes that, by necessity, distinguish between different economic classes in their operation. However, if you incorporate a 'compelling practical reason' exception, it seems to me that this proposal may fail to be distinguished from the Charter of Civil Rights, and further it may not achieve the purpose you intend it to. It is an unenviable problem. The best I could advise is to qualify the potential practical reasons you would accept as reasonable justifications for discrimination, such as the relief of poverty. That said, that would likely involve the creation of a complete list of potential exceptions, which may be troublesome and potentially inflexible. Nonetheless, that is the only solution I can come up with at this time.
"I must also note that other ambassadors have expressed reservations on the legality of your proposal. I have no such opinions, as I have not examined the resolutions closely enough to come to a conclusion at the moment. However, depending on how further amendments may make this proposal further resemble or contradict the Charter of Civil Rights, there may be a further legality problem to contend with.
"I am sorry for my unhelpfulness, Ambassador, but I do hope you will manage to put forth an impressive proposal in the end. Best of luck to you."
We do agree that we are in a really bad position here. Truthfully, the best option known our eyes is to draft a specific list of exemptions to the rule, such as welfare. If you would like to request that we add anything, that would be greatly appreciated.