Page 1 of 1

bans on unlegal arrest to a type specific citizen on forgein

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 4:54 am
by ChoenStan
bans on unlegal arrest to a type specific citizen on forgein contrey

Category : Civil Rights Strength : significant By : ChoenStan


As a nation in the world assembley I want to know that I can provide protection to my citizens from those who want to attack my country as a first step to take control of a larger area as a last step

For citizens of the nations of the world to live quietly without knowing that tomorrow morning a citizen who has completed a compulsory year of compulsory service without a choice may find himself under suspicion of foreign eyes in a foreign country. I would like to receive legal rights
To citizens who have been released from the army

(1)Defines a citizen who completed compulsory service and is found in the first year As free and need to legal justic protection
In a foreign country


(2) Bans the about unlegal arrest citizen from type from section a

(B)a 1 The right to remain silent - the right to remain silent during interrogation and not to cooperate However, the interrogators will also have the right to exercise diplomatic tools to break the right to remain silent

3. The right to legal protection is verified The origin of that citizen who is in a foreign nation so that the citizen who leaves the army of the country of origin shall not be sent to prison for the rest of his life or death in dictatorial countries

4. All nations of the World Assembly must recognize the legal validity of the law
Since if the law passes it includes everyone and states that do not agree to the law

(5) By virtue of your membership in the organization of the World Assembly, you acknowledge the legal validity of the law towards your country if the law passes through the organization of the World Assembly even if you voted against the law



(1) bans from to be damaged physical or psychological abuse, In a foreign country

(2) bans from they are required to be in physical locations that would be damaging to their health,

(4) bans from abuse which involves the manual transport or handling

(5) bans from in environments exposing them to temperatures, noise levels, or vibrations damaging to their health,

(6) bans from in environments that may expose them to hazardous substances, agents and/or processes,

(7) Bans the participation of citizen of this kind in armed conflict.

(8) Bans Sexual abuse citizen of this kind and in any other citizen

Note : My first rule and English from Google translate and from another rule
Note : i try to read about what rule i can to sent to world assembley so i work on this a few days and i dont know if this good or no so be nice with me

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 5:43 am
by Maletora
... First, add [DRAFT] to the beginning of this. Secondly... whot? What is this even for?

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 5:48 am
by Araraukar
OOC: The wording makes some of the clauses incomprehensible, and also you duplicate (and at a quick look, contradict) several existing resolutions. I suggest you search the Passed Resolutions thread with all the necessary keywords to find the resolutions.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 4:46 pm
by Wallenburg
I have no idea what this means.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 4:56 pm
by Sterkistan
Oh my. This was an experience to read through.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 5:19 pm
by Elyreia
ChoenStan wrote:
(1)Defines a citizen who completed compulsory service and is found in the first year As free and need to legal justic protection
In a foreign country


So this legislation applies only to people meet the following criteria
A) were drafted or conscripted into compulsory military service
B) completed only a single year of said service
C) are in a foreign land.

Elyreian citizens are conscripted for 4 years. How do you manage that?

ChoenStan wrote:(2) Bans the about unlegal arrest citizen from type from section a


Appears covered by GAR #201 "Habeas Corpus", specifically "DEMANDS that detention shall neither be arbitrary nor shall continue if deemed illegal" I also believe GAR #37 "Fairness in Criminal Trials" and GAR #229 "Access to Courts" cover proving detainee guilt and innocence.

ChoenStan wrote:(B)a 1 The right to remain silent - the right to remain silent during interrogation and not to cooperate However, the interrogators will also have the right to exercise diplomatic tools to break the right to remain silent


Appears covered by WAR #37 "Fairness in Criminal Trials", "INSISTS that the accused and their representative be permitted to confer in private as regards the facts and presentation of the case, and that no part of such a conference may be revealed to any third party without the explicit permission of the accused"

ChoenStan wrote:3. The right to legal protection is verified The origin of that citizen who is in a foreign nation so that the citizen who leaves the army of the country of origin shall not be sent to prison for the rest of his life or death in dictatorial countries


Covered by WAR #37 "Fairness in Criminal Trials" and WAR #229 "Access to Courts".

ChoenStan wrote:4. All nations of the World Assembly must recognize the legal validity of the law
Since if the law passes it includes everyone and states that do not agree to the law


If you mean passing of the current legislation your are proposing, that is covered in GAR #2 "Rights and Duties of WA States".
If you mean that WA states must adhere to the law in and of itself, also covered in the above and GAR #374 "The Rule of Law".

ChoenStan wrote:(5) By virtue of your membership in the organization of the World Assembly, you acknowledge the legal validity of the law towards your country if the law passes through the organization of the World Assembly even if you voted against the law


Covered by GAR #2 "Rights and Duties of WA States" and GAR #374 "The Rule of Law".

ChoenStan wrote:(1) bans from to be damaged physical or psychological abuse, In a foreign country


Covered by WAR #6 "Humanitarian Transport", WAR #147 "Extradition Rights", WAR #194 "Treatment of Inmates", and WAR #9 "Prevention of Torture".

ChoenStan wrote:(2) bans from they are required to be in physical locations that would be damaging to their health,


Covered by WAR #6 "Humanitarian Transport", WAR #194 "Treatment of Inmates", and WAR #9 "Prevention of Torture".

ChoenStan wrote:(4) bans from abuse which involves the manual transport or handling


Covered by WAR #6 "Humanitarian Transport", WAR #194 "Treatment of Inmates", and WAR #9 "Prevention of Torture".

ChoenStan wrote:(5) bans from in environments exposing them to temperatures, noise levels, or vibrations damaging to their health,


Covered by WAR #6 "Humanitarian Transport", WAR #194 "Treatment of Inmates", and WAR #9 "Prevention of Torture".

ChoenStan wrote:(6) bans from in environments that may expose them to hazardous substances, agents and/or processes,


Covered by WAR #6 "Humanitarian Transport", WAR #194 "Treatment of Inmates", and WAR #9 "Prevention of Torture".

ChoenStan wrote:(7) Bans the participation of citizen of this kind in armed conflict.


You're requesting that a citizen who has completed compulsory military service to no longer be allowed to serve in a military conflict? Or stating that the detained citizen cannot be forced to serve the nation that has detained them? Because that'll be covered by all of the above AND WAR #18 "The Prisoners of War Accord" I believe.

ChoenStan wrote:(8) Bans Sexual abuse citizen of this kind and in any other citizen


Covered by Covered by WAR #6 "Humanitarian Transport", WAR #194 "Treatment of Inmates", and WAR #9 "Prevention of Torture".


Elyreia stands in opposition of this completely senseless and redundant legislation that provides nothing that isn't already covered elsewhere, better.

Against.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2019 9:29 am
by ChoenStan
Elyreia wrote:
ChoenStan wrote:
(1)Defines a citizen who completed compulsory service and is found in the first year As free and need to legal justic protection
In a foreign country


So this legislation applies only to people meet the following criteria
A) were drafted or conscripted into compulsory military service
B) completed only a single year of said service
C) are in a foreign land.

Elyreian citizens are conscripted for 4 years. How do you manage that?

ChoenStan wrote:(2) Bans the about unlegal arrest citizen from type from section a


Appears covered by GAR #201 "Habeas Corpus", specifically "DEMANDS that detention shall neither be arbitrary nor shall continue if deemed illegal" I also believe GAR #37 "Fairness in Criminal Trials" and GAR #229 "Access to Courts" cover proving detainee guilt and innocence.

ChoenStan wrote:(B)a 1 The right to remain silent - the right to remain silent during interrogation and not to cooperate However, the interrogators will also have the right to exercise diplomatic tools to break the right to remain silent


Appears covered by WAR #37 "Fairness in Criminal Trials", "INSISTS that the accused and their representative be permitted to confer in private as regards the facts and presentation of the case, and that no part of such a conference may be revealed to any third party without the explicit permission of the accused"

ChoenStan wrote:3. The right to legal protection is verified The origin of that citizen who is in a foreign nation so that the citizen who leaves the army of the country of origin shall not be sent to prison for the rest of his life or death in dictatorial countries


Covered by WAR #37 "Fairness in Criminal Trials" and WAR #229 "Access to Courts".

ChoenStan wrote:4. All nations of the World Assembly must recognize the legal validity of the law
Since if the law passes it includes everyone and states that do not agree to the law


If you mean passing of the current legislation your are proposing, that is covered in GAR #2 "Rights and Duties of WA States".
If you mean that WA states must adhere to the law in and of itself, also covered in the above and GAR #374 "The Rule of Law".

ChoenStan wrote:(5) By virtue of your membership in the organization of the World Assembly, you acknowledge the legal validity of the law towards your country if the law passes through the organization of the World Assembly even if you voted against the law


Covered by GAR #2 "Rights and Duties of WA States" and GAR #374 "The Rule of Law".

ChoenStan wrote:(1) bans from to be damaged physical or psychological abuse, In a foreign country


Covered by WAR #6 "Humanitarian Transport", WAR #147 "Extradition Rights", WAR #194 "Treatment of Inmates", and WAR #9 "Prevention of Torture".

ChoenStan wrote:(2) bans from they are required to be in physical locations that would be damaging to their health,


Covered by WAR #6 "Humanitarian Transport", WAR #194 "Treatment of Inmates", and WAR #9 "Prevention of Torture".

ChoenStan wrote:(4) bans from abuse which involves the manual transport or handling


Covered by WAR #6 "Humanitarian Transport", WAR #194 "Treatment of Inmates", and WAR #9 "Prevention of Torture".

ChoenStan wrote:(5) bans from in environments exposing them to temperatures, noise levels, or vibrations damaging to their health,


Covered by WAR #6 "Humanitarian Transport", WAR #194 "Treatment of Inmates", and WAR #9 "Prevention of Torture".

ChoenStan wrote:(6) bans from in environments that may expose them to hazardous substances, agents and/or processes,


Covered by WAR #6 "Humanitarian Transport", WAR #194 "Treatment of Inmates", and WAR #9 "Prevention of Torture".

ChoenStan wrote:(7) Bans the participation of citizen of this kind in armed conflict.


You're requesting that a citizen who has completed compulsory military service to no longer be allowed to serve in a military conflict? Or stating that the detained citizen cannot be forced to serve the nation that has detained them? Because that'll be covered by all of the above AND WAR #18 "The Prisoners of War Accord" I believe.

ChoenStan wrote:(8) Bans Sexual abuse citizen of this kind and in any other citizen


Covered by Covered by WAR #6 "Humanitarian Transport", WAR #194 "Treatment of Inmates", and WAR #9 "Prevention of Torture".


Elyreia stands in opposition of this completely senseless and redundant legislation that provides nothing that isn't already covered elsewhere, better.

Against.


WOW OMG tankyou man for the review and for you dont say only no and you explain very good whay no need my rule ?

so you say no need my rule ?

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2019 5:04 pm
by Sterkistan
ChoenStan wrote:
WOW OMG tankyou man for the review and for you dont say only no and you explain very good whay no need my rule ?

so you say no need my rule ?

"Yes, he argues the bill is useless because existing legislation already covers everything you're attempting to do in this bill, and does it better."

OOC:
Regardless of that, this bill would need extensive work to get it into a remotely passable shape. I understand that English probably isn't your native language. However, NS is english-based.
Proposals need to have at least a basic grammatical structure. And while I wish you luck with the improvement of your proposals. This is not the proposal for it.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:46 am
by The New California Republic
OOC: If this is ever going to see the light of day then it needs some substantial editing, as in its current state it would likely fall foul of the comprehensible English rule. I can see...something...in it, but a lot of the precise meaning is lost at the moment.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:49 am
by The Galactic Liberal Democracy
OOC:I would have an opinion on this if I could read it. I’m guessing that an ample portion of this is illegal though.