Page 1 of 1
Moral Decency
Posted:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 9:39 amby Genovian Empire
Public Decency
Ashamed that this Assembly does not already guarantee or recognize the right of an individual and their family to be comfortable walking around their country free from moral indecency,
Cognizant that some governments deliberately support affording the right of same-sex marriage in order to suppress the freedoms and liberties of the heterosexual individuals and maintain a controlling presence on traditional marriage and society,
Acknowledging that government services seek to destroy the family and society and may endanger life as we know it,
Hereby,
1. Defines “family” as someone related to an individual by blood, in marriage, in law,
2. Restricts homosexual acts to the privacy of their own homes, not to be flaunted in public,
3. Affirms the place of traditional families in society, and declares that nations are to only permit heterosexual acts of affection in public,
4. Clarifies that nothing in this resolution should be read to void, infringe, or adversely impact any other right to or regulation of arms affirmed by this Assembly, but allows criminalization of a homosexual act in public,
5. Further clarifies that nothing in this resolution should be read to infringe upon the efficacy of homosexual acts or to promote violence,
Posted:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:21 amby Maowi
Genovian Empire wrote:declares that nations are to only permit heterosexual acts of affection in public,
Apart from the fact that I disagree with the whole idea, is this not a blatant violation of GAR 35?
Posted:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:39 amby The New Nordic Union
Maowi wrote:Genovian Empire wrote:declares that nations are to only permit heterosexual acts of affection in public,
Apart from the fact that I disagree with the whole idea, is this not a blatant violation of GAR 35?
OOC:
It is.
Also, clause (4) does not make sense at all; what does this resolution have to do with the regulation of arms, and what do arms have to do with homosexuality?
Posted:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:41 amby Hystaria
...You don't even know how to make a poll correctly....
Posted:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 11:59 amby Separatist Peoples
"Opposed. Free love is best love."
Posted:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 12:02 pmby Tinfect
OOC:
Yes, yes, you think homophobia is funny. We get it. Crawl back under your rock.
Posted:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 1:23 pmby Grays Harbor
We are really curious how two people getting married “suppresses the freedoms and liberties” of anybody?
Posted:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 2:08 pmby Sierra Lyricalia
"Wait, you're serious."
OOC: This proposal violates several existing laws, and has the added weakness that it never actually defines the thing it's trying to outlaw. What is a "homosexual act?" What makes a family "traditional?" And how on earth does one infringe on the "
efficacy" of homosexual acts? What does that even mean?
TL;dr This is illegal and doomed.
Posted:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 2:42 pmby Jebslund
Genovian Empire wrote:Public Decency
Ashamed that this Assembly does not already guarantee or recognize the right of an individual and their family to be comfortable walking around their country free from moral indecency,
Cognizant that some governments deliberately support affording the right of same-sex marriage in order to suppress the freedoms and liberties of the heterosexual individuals and maintain a controlling presence on traditional marriage and society,
Acknowledging that government services seek to destroy the family and society and may endanger life as we know it,
Hereby,
1. Defines “family” as someone related to an individual by blood, in marriage, in law,
2. Restricts homosexual acts to the privacy of their own homes, not to be flaunted in public,
3. Affirms the place of traditional families in society, and declares that nations are to only permit heterosexual acts of affection in public,
4. Clarifies that nothing in this resolution should be read to void, infringe, or adversely impact any other right to or regulation of arms affirmed by this Assembly, but allows criminalization of a homosexual act in public,
5. Further clarifies that nothing in this resolution should be read to infringe upon the efficacy of homosexual acts or to promote violence,
[Preserving a copy in case it gets nuked before the mods can look at it]
Posted:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:16 pmby The Sheika
Opposed, mostly because I am trying to figure out how someone is oppressed by the rights they already have being granted to somebody else. That and contradiction of existing legislation.
Posted:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 5:24 pmby Libertariatropolis
Strongly opposed. The job of the World Assembly is to defend human rights, not suppress them with such acts as these.
Posted:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 5:31 pmby Korwin
Genovia, listen, we know that your trying to be edgy and you want to go against the stream, but I promise that you'll soon grow out of it. I had a rebellious phase in my youth too, ya know.
P.S.
You don't have to stay in the closet, I know what it's like to have internalized hatred, and believe me, it feels so much better to be your true self.
It's okay, we all love you!
Posted:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:03 pmby Wallenburg
Why are you plagiarizing "Right to Self-Defense" in a proposal to pray the gay away?
Posted:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 1:03 amby The Mongol Plain
Homophobic. Against.
Posted:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 1:10 amby Pilipinas and Malaya
As said by
Separatist Peoples, “Free Love, Best Love.”.
Posted:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 1:13 amby Sapientia Et Bellum
The solution is obviously a full and complete ban on all affection... Kissing and sex spreads germs, its a public health issue!
Posted:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 1:15 amby Valentine Z
"I am going to have to be against this policy, my dear Ambassador. Also, instead of only keeping homosexual acts in private, why not do the same for heterosexuals as well? Do note that I am not being discriminatory towards anyone, but as we all know, the acts in bed should be kept in the bedroom, not with an outside audience to see!- Lead Ambassador Germaine Athena “Mercy De Herzhafter Schutzengel” Sylvi Angelina Zoe Sophia Jen Alanna Rx Hailie Ziegler ConstanceSapientia Et Bellum wrote:The solutions is obviously an full and complete ban on all affection... Kissing and sex spreads germs, its a public health issue!
"As a nation full of love, I am afraid we cannot let you have that implemented."- Lead Ambassador Germaine Athena “Mercy De Herzhafter Schutzengel” Sylvi Angelina Zoe Sophia Jen Alanna Rx Hailie Ziegler Constance
Posted:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 1:29 amby Aclion
If this is really a concern then what stops nations from implementing policies at a national level to address the issue?
(Other the contradictions with WA law of course.)
Jebslund wrote:[Preserving a copy in case it gets nuked before the mods can look at it]
I'm sure the mods appreciate people going out of their way to make more work for them.
Posted:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 1:32 amby Great Wendor
OOC: if this passes, I’m out of the WA
Posted:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 3:39 amby Jebslund
Aclion wrote:If this is really a concern then what stops nations from implementing policies at a national level to address the issue?
(Other the contradictions with WA law of course.)
Jebslund wrote:[Preserving a copy in case it gets nuked before the mods can look at it]
I'm sure the mods appreciate people going out of their way to make more work for them. :p
It's basically a hit-and-run troll post with, as Wallenberg pointed out, a side-order of plagiarism. I've already reported it in the MMLG mega.
Posted:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:38 amby Wrapper
Wallenburg wrote:Why are you plagiarizing "Right to Self-Defense" in a proposal to pray the gay away?
This. Regardless of the merits (or lack thereof) of this proposal, submitting this will result in your expulsion from the WA. Thread locked.