NATION

PASSWORD

[Draft] International Criminal Protocol

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Tinfect
Senator
 
Posts: 4455
Founded: Jul 04, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

[Draft] International Criminal Protocol

Postby Tinfect » Wed Jan 02, 2019 12:55 am

International Criminal Protocol

Category: Civil Rights || Strength: Strong

Image

Origin: Imperium of Tinfect,
Author: Raslin Seretis, Imperial Diplomatic Envoy

Imperial Division of Foreign Policy and Diplomatic Action
Counsel: Tolarn Feren, Civil Oversight Representative

Counsel: Jasot Rehlan, Military Oversight Representative



The World Assembly,

Annoyed by the insistence regarding passing yet another pointless non-compromise that will merely facilitate legal abuses and result in infinitely worse legislation being passed,

Acknowledging prior attempts to ensure that the criminal justice systems of Member-States operate in a just and ethical manner,

Dismayed by their failure to adequately provide protections from legal abuse and to provide closure and restitution to victims,

Seeking to immediately prevent any further abuses of criminal justice systems,

Hereby;

Defines:
  1. Capital punishment as the execution of a criminal convicted of a crime as sentence for said crime,
  2. Solitary confinement as the complete or severe isolation of prisoners from contact with other inmates and/or prison staff,
  3. Protective confinement as the severe isolation of prisoners from contact with other inmates due to clear and present danger(s) to their life in the general prison population,
  4. Inhumane conditions as the refusal or withholding of necessary and healthy sustenance, medically or mentally necessary healthcare, severely confined or crowded conditions, or conditions inferior to those mandated for prisoners of war,

Prohibits:
  1. The holding of any prisoner in solitary confinement for any period greater than two days,
  2. The holding of any prisoner in consecutive periods of solitary confinement,
  3. The holding of any prisoners in inhumane conditions,
  4. The holding of any prisoner in protective confinement without the informed consent of the prisoner,
  5. The use of capital punishment for any crime that did not result in unlawful death, cruel or unusual treatment such as torture or rape, or an exceptional betrayal of national security,

Mandates:
  1. That Member-States provide to prisoners accessible legal recourse for the investigation of any undue violence or abuse by prison staff,
  2. That Member-States provide to prisoners accessible legal counsel and support for any prisoner sentenced to Capital Punishment, including access to appeals and stays of execution,
  3. The use of the highest reasonable standards of evidence when considering the use of capital punishment,
  4. That all executions be held at a reasonable date past sentencing, to be no shorter than a period of thirty days, alongside any processing time for legal requests or inquiries, as appropriate,
  5. That protective solitary confinement be be utilized only when there exists a clear and present danger to holding the prisoner within the general prison area,
  6. That prisoners subject to protective or solitary confinement be allowed regular contact with psychiatric staff and access to visitation as regularly allowed to prisoners,
  7. That, once a prisoner has been subjected to protective confinement, all practical measures must be taken to allow their safe return to general prison populations as soon as possible,


"Yes, yes, the Imperium is well-aware that Preventing the Execution of Innocents still stands; consider this a... gesture of good faith."

OOC:
Let's not pretend this is anything else but a replacement for Preventing the Execution of Innocents. My repeal for said resolution may be found here. I'm out of practice at this, so if it's an abomination... just, like, tell me why.

I do have a request though; if anyone can think of a way to prevent executions for minor crimes, that'd be great, because the only idea I've got is to explicitly restrict Execution to a handful of crimes, and, quite frankly, I do not believe that I could write that list alone. So, if you have a better way, or, a list, that'd great.

1. Added a limited exception for protective confinement, and various requirements regarding it.
2. Added Sierra Lyricalia's first suggestion, and substantially cleaned up the draft.

3. Loosened restrictions on Solitary Confinement.
Last edited by Tinfect on Tue Jan 22, 2019 12:35 am, edited 10 times in total.
Raslin Seretis, Imperial Diplomatic Envoy, Male
Tolarn Feren, Civil Oversight Representative, Male
Jasot Rehlan, Military Oversight Representative, Female


Bisexual, Transgender (She/Her), Native-American, and Actual CommunistTM. This nation does not represent my actual political beliefs.

Imperium Central News Network: Fourth Fleet reports successful engagements against Aeravahn forces in the Exterior Territories | Contact lost with 3rd Legion, presumed destroyed | TCO - Desolate Star destroyed in raid by Aeravahn forces | Military Overseer addresses concerns of Aeravahn Incursion: "No immediate concerns" | Indomitable Bastard #283

Nation stats have no power here!

User avatar
Karteria
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Jun 28, 2018
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Karteria » Wed Jan 02, 2019 1:02 am

I can't speak on the legality of this, but as a delegate, I will support this resolution should it be submitted.

I'm also not sure yet if there is anything else you should have included, but the writing is very succinct and easy to read.

User avatar
Kenmoria
Senator
 
Posts: 3575
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Corporate Bordello

Postby Kenmoria » Wed Jan 02, 2019 12:26 pm

“The first of the prohibitory clauses seems very vague and ill-defined. You make no mention of length in your definition of solitary confinement, thus would ban extremely short term measures, such as isolation for a period of hours while a riot is taking place, in this clause. Also, you have lots of capitalisation of terms you have defined throughout the proposal. Whilst this does have a consistent logic, it strikes me as rather unneeded and ugly.

As to the legislation on capital punishment, I still prefer Preventing the Execution of Innocents due to the downright ban, but there is nothing objectionable in this version, inasmuch as you provide barriers to its abuse and arbitrary instances of execution.”
Last edited by Kenmoria on Wed Jan 02, 2019 12:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A representative democracy with a parliament of 535 seats
Currently centre-right on economy but centre-left on social issues
Located in Europe and border France to the right and Spain below
NS stats and policies are not canon, use the factbooks
Not in the WA despite coincidentally following all resolutions
This is due to a problem with how the WA contradicts our democracy
However we do have a WA mission and often participate in drafting
Current ambassador: James Lewitt

For more information, read the factbooks here.

User avatar
United Massachusetts
Minister
 
Posts: 2145
Founded: Jan 17, 2016
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby United Massachusetts » Wed Jan 02, 2019 7:50 pm

I do have a request though; if anyone can think of a way to prevent executions for minor crimes, that'd be great, because the only idea I've got is to explicitly restrict Execution to a handful of crimes, and, quite frankly, I do not believe that I could write that list alone. So, if you have a better way, or, a list, that'd great.

"Ban on Capital Punishment. Done."

1. In all cases, the practice of Solitary Confinement,

"There are instances where solitary confinement is neccessary for protecting a prisoner from others who may cause him physical harm. We think an exception should be enumerated to this."
United Massachusetts
World Assembly Mission

Pro-Life Social Democratic Catholic
Ambassador: Bishop Alexander Pierce

WA Affairs Minister, The East Pacific
Assistant: Father Carl Sullivan

Fmr. President, Right to Life
Queen Yuno wrote:You have a very contradictory rep yourself, [UM].
Sanctaria wrote:We get it. You're pro-life.
Davelands wrote:(UM tries to slip another one by)
Wallenburg wrote:You've got to be the most ignorant person on this Discord.
Davelands wrote:Remember that United Mass is extremely on the religious right side. Look for hidden gotcha's for later. He is playing a long game with proposals...
"Stat crux dum volvitur orbis"
"The Cross is steady while the world is turning"


User avatar
Kowani
Minister
 
Posts: 2906
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Kowani » Wed Jan 02, 2019 9:00 pm

So, about that no Solitary Confinement thing. So, if we have a prisoner who is a danger to others or endangered by them (a la prison gangs), we cannot isolate them under this resolution?
My Nation doesn’t reflect my actual views, nor do I use NS stats for Roleplay.
Atheist and proud of it.
Pro: Freedom of Speech, LGBT rights, Abortion, Atheism, Secularism, Technophilia, Humanity, Peace in general, Egalitarianism, Pizza.
Anti: Religion, Violence, Misogyny, Misandry, Racism, Pedophilia, Facism, SJW’s, Willful Ignorance, Promotion of harmful cultural practices in the name of “cultural diversity”, whoever created "Ebola-chan."
Catalan Separatist. Catalunya Independiente!

User avatar
Araraukar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12091
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:39 am

United Massachusetts wrote:"Ban on Capital Punishment. Done."

"Only if you'll willingly take in all the criminals who would receive such a sentence..."
"I've come to appreciate boring bureaucracy much more after my official execution..." - Johan Milkus, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

User avatar
Saranidia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1809
Founded: Sep 14, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Saranidia » Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:42 am

Why must the conditions be as good as for prisoners of war for house burglars, woman and child killers,child molesters and rapists?

User avatar
Araraukar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12091
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:48 am

Saranidia wrote:Why must the conditions be as good as for prisoners of war for house burglars, woman and child killers,child molesters and rapists?

"Prisoners of war are protected by other resolutions."

OOC EDIT: "Killers and rapists (child molesters would in most cases fall under the latter)" catches two out of three reasons for Araraukar to execute anyone. Treason is the third, though that's less about selling government secrets and more about betraying national ideals, such as someone willfully destroying (like with causing intentional spills of pollution) natural habitats.
Last edited by Araraukar on Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I've come to appreciate boring bureaucracy much more after my official execution..." - Johan Milkus, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

User avatar
Saranidia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1809
Founded: Sep 14, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Saranidia » Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:50 am

Araraukar wrote:
Saranidia wrote:Why must the conditions be as good as for prisoners of war for house burglars, woman and child killers,child molesters and rapists?

"Prisoners of war are protected by other resolutions."


"I know but why must criminals be as protected"

User avatar
Araraukar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12091
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:55 am

Saranidia wrote:"I know but why must criminals be as protected"

OOC: Have to drop out of IC for this - I don't know what Tinfect's trying to go for, but the complete solitary confinement ban is why I can't support this. As for "protecting criminals" - they have quite a few protections as is, by existing resolutions. Tinfect can't contradict those resolutions, as she'd have to repeal more than one, and I don't think that's what she's trying to go for.

Kowani wrote:So, about that no Solitary Confinement thing. So, if we have a prisoner who is a danger to others or endangered by them (a la prison gangs), we cannot isolate them under this resolution?

"No. But you can probably bill their next of kin for the funeral costs, when the gangs have done their thing."
Last edited by Araraukar on Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I've come to appreciate boring bureaucracy much more after my official execution..." - Johan Milkus, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

User avatar
Tinfect
Senator
 
Posts: 4455
Founded: Jul 04, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Tinfect » Thu Jan 03, 2019 8:49 am

United Massachusetts wrote:"Ban on Capital Punishment. Done."


OOC:
Yes, yes, very clever.
IC:
United Massachusetts wrote:"There are instances where solitary confinement is neccessary for protecting a prisoner from others who may cause him physical harm. We think an exception should be enumerated to this."


"The Imperium finds this... unnecessary, in the face of alternatives for security with less risk of permanent psychological damage, but a limited exception may be made."

Araraukar wrote:As for "protecting criminals" - they have quite a few protections as is, by existing resolutions. Tinfect can't contradict those resolutions, as she'd have to repeal more than one, and I don't think that's what she's trying to go for.


OOC:
I don't think this contradicts anything; there's nothing about Solitary Confinement in Treatment of Inmates, and I'm not seeing much else?

~ ~ ~ ~

Edit:
Edits made to draft. This is done with OOC objections, but the Imperium doesn't really care, so y'all get what you want I suppose.
Last edited by Tinfect on Thu Jan 03, 2019 9:12 am, edited 3 times in total.
Raslin Seretis, Imperial Diplomatic Envoy, Male
Tolarn Feren, Civil Oversight Representative, Male
Jasot Rehlan, Military Oversight Representative, Female


Bisexual, Transgender (She/Her), Native-American, and Actual CommunistTM. This nation does not represent my actual political beliefs.

Imperium Central News Network: Fourth Fleet reports successful engagements against Aeravahn forces in the Exterior Territories | Contact lost with 3rd Legion, presumed destroyed | TCO - Desolate Star destroyed in raid by Aeravahn forces | Military Overseer addresses concerns of Aeravahn Incursion: "No immediate concerns" | Indomitable Bastard #283

Nation stats have no power here!

User avatar
New Bremerton
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 123
Founded: Jul 20, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby New Bremerton » Fri Jan 04, 2019 2:51 am

Full support.
The Holy Republic of New Bremerton
Region: The North Pacific
General Assembly: IC
Security Council: OOC

"Liberi Fatali"

This nation does not use NSStats.

User avatar
Sierra Lyricalia
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 3044
Founded: Nov 29, 2008
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Sierra Lyricalia » Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:59 am

Tinfect wrote:OOC:

...I do have a request though; if anyone can think of a way to prevent executions for minor crimes, that'd be great, because the only idea I've got is to explicitly restrict Execution to a handful of crimes, and, quite frankly, I do not believe that I could write that list alone. So, if you have a better way, or, a list, that'd great.


OOC: Hmm. Lemme take a crack at it.

"Mandates..."

"...That capital punishment never be administered for any crime which did not result in unlawful death, cruel or unusual treatment such as torture, or an exceptional betrayal of national security..."

That should cover the basic crimes and assuage the "but mah treason!" crowd. If you want to tighten it up a bit, that works too, though that might involve a calculus of gaining otherwise-abolitionists vs. losing orcs. But there must be room for this kind of reasonable middle ground, I would think...

Alternative formulation:
"...that capital punishment never be administered for any offense not defined as a war crime, crime against humanity, or 'affront to civilization' by World Assembly legislation..." That odd phrasing or some other language is necessary to include genocide in the list of possible offenses (GAR #38 somehow does not contain the other two terms).

Either way, I still support this both IC and OOC.
Principal-Agent & Master of Duck Recipes, Anarchy
The Mostly Alright Steph Zakalwe *
Author: 354 GA / Issues 436, 451, 724
S.L. Ambassador to the World Assembly
Tech Level: Complicated (or not: 7/0/6 i.e. 12) / RP Details
The Semi-Honorable Leonid Berkman Pavonis,
Ambassador-At-Large
Illustrious Bum #279
Pol. Compass: Econ. -5 to -8, Soc. -8 to -9 (depending), 8values: LibSoc
"When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called 'the People’s Stick.'" -Mikhail Bakunin (to Karl Marx)


User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8400
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Fri Jan 04, 2019 3:08 pm

I'll note there is nothing in here requiring nations to provide restitution for wrongful executions.

Author: 1 SC and 26 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Delegate for Europe
Out-of-character unless marked otherwise
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate

User avatar
Araraukar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12091
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Fri Jan 04, 2019 4:24 pm

Tinfect wrote:
Araraukar wrote:As for "protecting criminals" - they have quite a few protections as is, by existing resolutions. Tinfect can't contradict those resolutions, as she'd have to repeal more than one, and I don't think that's what she's trying to go for.

OOC: I don't think this contradicts anything; there's nothing about Solitary Confinement in Treatment of Inmates, and I'm not seeing much else?

OOC: I meant that you can't put in stuff about being allowed to torture POWs for information or anything else that would contradict existing resolutions. You weren't contradicting anything from what I could see. :P
"I've come to appreciate boring bureaucracy much more after my official execution..." - Johan Milkus, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4900
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Auralia » Fri Jan 04, 2019 5:40 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:I'll note there is nothing in here requiring nations to provide restitution for wrongful executions.

GAR #108.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
Also known as Railana

"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Tinfect
Senator
 
Posts: 4455
Founded: Jul 04, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Tinfect » Sat Jan 05, 2019 1:29 pm

Sierra Lyricalia wrote:OOC: Hmm. Lemme take a crack at it.

"Mandates..."

"...That capital punishment never be administered for any crime which did not result in unlawful death, cruel or unusual treatment such as torture, or an exceptional betrayal of national security..."

That should cover the basic crimes and assuage the "but mah treason!" crowd. If you want to tighten it up a bit, that works too, though that might involve a calculus of gaining otherwise-abolitionists vs. losing orcs. But there must be room for this kind of reasonable middle ground, I would think...


OOC:
This could work, with a little tweak I'd think, thanks. I'll put it in the draft when I next get around to editing it.
Raslin Seretis, Imperial Diplomatic Envoy, Male
Tolarn Feren, Civil Oversight Representative, Male
Jasot Rehlan, Military Oversight Representative, Female


Bisexual, Transgender (She/Her), Native-American, and Actual CommunistTM. This nation does not represent my actual political beliefs.

Imperium Central News Network: Fourth Fleet reports successful engagements against Aeravahn forces in the Exterior Territories | Contact lost with 3rd Legion, presumed destroyed | TCO - Desolate Star destroyed in raid by Aeravahn forces | Military Overseer addresses concerns of Aeravahn Incursion: "No immediate concerns" | Indomitable Bastard #283

Nation stats have no power here!

User avatar
United Massachusetts
Minister
 
Posts: 2145
Founded: Jan 17, 2016
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby United Massachusetts » Sat Jan 05, 2019 5:38 pm

Sierra Lyricalia wrote:Alternative formulation:
"...that capital punishment never be administered for any offense not defined as a war crime, crime against humanity, or 'affront to civilization' by World Assembly legislation..." That odd phrasing or some other language is necessary to include genocide in the list of possible offenses (GAR #38 somehow does not contain the other two terms).

Either way, I still support this both IC and OOC.

We will consider supporting this wording. United Massachusetts is fine with the abolition of capital punishment except for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
United Massachusetts
World Assembly Mission

Pro-Life Social Democratic Catholic
Ambassador: Bishop Alexander Pierce

WA Affairs Minister, The East Pacific
Assistant: Father Carl Sullivan

Fmr. President, Right to Life
Queen Yuno wrote:You have a very contradictory rep yourself, [UM].
Sanctaria wrote:We get it. You're pro-life.
Davelands wrote:(UM tries to slip another one by)
Wallenburg wrote:You've got to be the most ignorant person on this Discord.
Davelands wrote:Remember that United Mass is extremely on the religious right side. Look for hidden gotcha's for later. He is playing a long game with proposals...
"Stat crux dum volvitur orbis"
"The Cross is steady while the world is turning"


User avatar
Greater Galactic Protectorate
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Jan 01, 2019
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Greater Galactic Protectorate » Sun Jan 06, 2019 1:38 am

"The Greater Galactic Protectorate is appalled by this illegal and unreasonable draft of a resolution as it currently stands, as it is blatantly shown that whoever proposed and will support such a poor attempts to exercise tyranny among fellow nations have little to no control over their citizens, nor do they wish to bear any responsibilities for them."
Last edited by Greater Galactic Protectorate on Sun Jan 06, 2019 1:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kenmoria
Senator
 
Posts: 3575
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Corporate Bordello

Postby Kenmoria » Sun Jan 06, 2019 1:15 pm

Greater Galactic Protectorate wrote:"The Greater Galactic Protectorate is appalled by this illegal and unreasonable draft of a resolution as it currently stands, as it is blatantly shown that whoever proposed and will support such a poor attempts to exercise tyranny among fellow nations have little to no control over their citizens, nor do they wish to bear any responsibilities for them."

“What is it about this draft that is illegal? As far as I can tell, it seems quite reasonable. I also wish to add my support for the idea proposed by Sierra Lyricalia, due to the lack of loophole potentional.”
A representative democracy with a parliament of 535 seats
Currently centre-right on economy but centre-left on social issues
Located in Europe and border France to the right and Spain below
NS stats and policies are not canon, use the factbooks
Not in the WA despite coincidentally following all resolutions
This is due to a problem with how the WA contradicts our democracy
However we do have a WA mission and often participate in drafting
Current ambassador: James Lewitt

For more information, read the factbooks here.

User avatar
Fecaw
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 190
Founded: Feb 10, 2018
New York Times Democracy

Postby Fecaw » Sun Jan 06, 2019 2:06 pm

Support. Should "Executions" in Mandate 4 be capitalized?

User avatar
Tinfect
Senator
 
Posts: 4455
Founded: Jul 04, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Tinfect » Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:39 pm

"A revised version of the draft has been prepared. Do examine it at your leisure."
Raslin Seretis, Imperial Diplomatic Envoy, Male
Tolarn Feren, Civil Oversight Representative, Male
Jasot Rehlan, Military Oversight Representative, Female


Bisexual, Transgender (She/Her), Native-American, and Actual CommunistTM. This nation does not represent my actual political beliefs.

Imperium Central News Network: Fourth Fleet reports successful engagements against Aeravahn forces in the Exterior Territories | Contact lost with 3rd Legion, presumed destroyed | TCO - Desolate Star destroyed in raid by Aeravahn forces | Military Overseer addresses concerns of Aeravahn Incursion: "No immediate concerns" | Indomitable Bastard #283

Nation stats have no power here!

User avatar
Old Hope
Diplomat
 
Posts: 740
Founded: Sep 21, 2014
Tyranny by Majority

Postby Old Hope » Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:37 am

Greater Galactic Protectorate wrote:"The Greater Galactic Protectorate is appalled by this illegal and unreasonable draft of a resolution as it currently stands, as it is blatantly shown that whoever proposed and will support such a poor attempts to exercise tyranny among fellow nations have little to no control over their citizens, nor do they wish to bear any responsibilities for them."

It would be illegal to submit it right now, but the author already acknowledged that there needs to be a repeal first.
That doesn't make drafting this illegitimate.

User avatar
Desmosthenes and Burke
Envoy
 
Posts: 204
Founded: Oct 07, 2017
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Desmosthenes and Burke » Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:08 am

United Massachusetts wrote:
Sierra Lyricalia wrote:Alternative formulation:
"...that capital punishment never be administered for any offense not defined as a war crime, crime against humanity, or 'affront to civilization' by World Assembly legislation..." That odd phrasing or some other language is necessary to include genocide in the list of possible offenses (GAR #38 somehow does not contain the other two terms).

Either way, I still support this both IC and OOC.

We will consider supporting this wording. United Massachusetts is fine with the abolition of capital punishment except for war crimes and crimes against humanity.


That his excellency the Bishop Pierce supports this wording is reason enough for the author to refuse it outright.

The other suggestion by Sierra Lyricalia would be acceptable to us. We might prefer something looser, but as a compromise to attract swing votes, this is workable. Honestly, almost anything at this point is an improvement over another attempt by the United Massachusetts delegation in regards to justice.

User avatar
Kenmoria
Senator
 
Posts: 3575
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Corporate Bordello

Postby Kenmoria » Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:10 pm

“I see a problem in the second and third prohibitory clauses. Namely, you don’t exclude ‘protective Custody’ from the definition of ‘solitary confinement’, so they contradict each other.”
A representative democracy with a parliament of 535 seats
Currently centre-right on economy but centre-left on social issues
Located in Europe and border France to the right and Spain below
NS stats and policies are not canon, use the factbooks
Not in the WA despite coincidentally following all resolutions
This is due to a problem with how the WA contradicts our democracy
However we do have a WA mission and often participate in drafting
Current ambassador: James Lewitt

For more information, read the factbooks here.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Battlion, Greater Imperial Rossiya, Newark Aristocracy

Advertisement

Remove ads