NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Repeal "Safeguarding Nuclear Materials"

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Wallenburg
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19226
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
New York Times Democracy

[DRAFT] Repeal "Safeguarding Nuclear Materials"

Postby Wallenburg » Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:31 pm

Repeal "Safeguarding Nuclear Materials​​"
Image
Category: Repeal || Resolution: GAR #418 || Proposed by: Wallenburg

Recognizing the precarious nature of international politics, especially between states where there exists the threat of nuclear devastation,

Understanding that the target resolution attempts to preserve peace among nuclear states through the near total deregulation of the construction, trade, and use of nuclear weapons,

Recognizing that this model is unsustainable, and fails to secure peace when nuclear states do not fear retaliation for any nuclear strikes they might commit to,

Alarmed that clause two "maintains the right of member nations to trade nuclear weapons or reactors", to any other state, regardless of the stability or belligerence of those states,

Seeing that this clause prohibits the Assembly from establishing regulations capable of limiting the accumulation of nuclear weapons and material in belligerent nations likely to instigate large-scale nuclear exchange, that is, the very nations that most compromise the principle of mutually assured destruction,

Also recognizing that international tensions between nuclear states cannot ease through the constant threat of an unprovoked first strike,

Observing that the target guarantees member states the right to deploy nuclear weapons in retaliation for any kind of attack, regardless of how minor it may be, and even if that attack occurs in retaliation for an act of aggression by the relevant member states,

Hereby repeals GAR #418, "Safeguarding Nuclear Materials".
PROFESSIONAL CRITIC OF ALL THINGS GENSEC
There never has been, nor will there ever be, such thing as a wallenburger.
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
PRO: GOOD || ANTI: BAD

User avatar
Wallenburg
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19226
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
New York Times Democracy

Postby Wallenburg » Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:31 pm

Reserved
PROFESSIONAL CRITIC OF ALL THINGS GENSEC
There never has been, nor will there ever be, such thing as a wallenburger.
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
PRO: GOOD || ANTI: BAD

User avatar
Wallenburg
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19226
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
New York Times Democracy

Postby Wallenburg » Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:03 am

Bump
PROFESSIONAL CRITIC OF ALL THINGS GENSEC
There never has been, nor will there ever be, such thing as a wallenburger.
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
PRO: GOOD || ANTI: BAD

User avatar
Kenmoria
Senator
 
Posts: 3551
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Corporate Bordello

Postby Kenmoria » Fri Jan 11, 2019 10:18 am

“This seems like a well-argued repeal proposal, and has my support.”
A representative democracy with a parliament of 535 seats
Currently centre-right on economy but centre-left on social issues
Located in Europe and border France to the right and Spain below
NS stats and policies are not canon, use the factbooks
Not in the WA despite coincidentally following all resolutions
This is due to a problem with how the WA contradicts our democracy
However we do have a WA mission and often participate in drafting
Current ambassador: James Lewitt

For more information, read the factbooks here.

User avatar
Karteria
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Jun 28, 2018
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Karteria » Fri Jan 11, 2019 10:25 pm

"This repeal highlights the primary concerns we have with the target resolution – that nuclear proliferation is unsustainable and must be limited.
Full support."


Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bananaistan

Advertisement

Remove ads