NationStates

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2019 8:03 pm**

Against. Unvaccinated children shouldn't be allowed to be used for biological warfare against the education system by those who are anti-government. You're supporting terrorism within my nation and it will not be forgotten.

Posted: **Fri Apr 17, 2020 12:40 pm**

Ogenbond wipes a good half-inch of dust off the table of this long-forgotten drafting chamber and gets back to work. The sign indicates that this proposal is once again up for discussion.

Posted: **Fri Apr 17, 2020 12:59 pm**

an unknown Tinhamptonian Intern(TM): Wait... it's that much?

(Full support)

Posted: **Fri Apr 17, 2020 1:08 pm**

Where did you land on a replacement?

Posted: **Fri Apr 17, 2020 1:32 pm**

Attempted Socialism wrote:Where did you land on a replacement?

I'm not particularly inclined to write a replacement myself, but given how long it's been since the target was last evaluated, I'll see about putting something together. I won't submit this without some replacement or another ready and drafted, that much I can guarantee.

Posted: **Sun May 22, 2022 4:07 pm**

F u l l s u p p o r t

With that flaw, I can't see how the target resolution even reached quorum, let alone passed! Good luck!

Posted: **Sun May 22, 2022 4:27 pm**

Oh yeah, this exists. It would need one hell of a rework, especially given the last 2 years, but I still don't like how the target treats children as outlaws for the stupidity of their parents.

Posted: **Sun May 22, 2022 5:19 pm**

'Full support, with or without a replacement.'

Posted: **Sun May 22, 2022 5:57 pm**

I have always believed that PHVA should be repealed.

Posted: **Sun May 22, 2022 6:00 pm**

Yikes, that's an... interesting target resolution.

Posted: **Sun May 22, 2022 6:02 pm**

The Orwell Society wrote:F u l l s u p p o r t

With that flaw, I can't see how the target resolution even reached quorum, let alone passed! Good luck!

Why did you bump this tho :blink:

Posted: **Sun May 22, 2022 6:04 pm**

Fachumonn wrote:
The Orwell Society wrote:F u l l s u p p o r t

With that flaw, I can't see how the target resolution even reached quorum, let alone passed! Good luck!

Why did you bump this tho

The secret is that Literally 1984 is my puppet.

Posted: **Sun May 22, 2022 6:07 pm**

Wallenburg wrote:
Fachumonn wrote:Why did you bump this tho

The secret is that Literally 1984 is my puppet.

Posted: **Sun May 22, 2022 6:08 pm**

Tinhampton wrote:I have always believed that PHVA should be repealed.

OOC: With your record of resolution crafting, kind of surprised you didn't lol (that's a compliment, not an insult). I actually personally have no strong opinions towards this resolution and if it gets repealed or not, but alas, if this ever goes to the chambers, I'll vote inevitably with my IC persona.

Fachumonn wrote:
The Orwell Society wrote:F u l l s u p p o r t

With that flaw, I can't see how the target resolution even reached quorum, let alone passed! Good luck!

Why did you bump this tho

OOC: Eh...I'm honestly surprised with how many resolutions I've seen abandoned and not officially classified as such. Resolutions that could've been great, just thrown into the abandoned pit, never to be heard from again. I think the WA should be allowed to takeover dead resolutions of a certain age and revive them as seen fit.

Posted: **Sun May 22, 2022 6:12 pm**

Literally 1984 wrote:
Wallenburg wrote:The secret is that Literally 1984 is my puppet.

Something's fishy about this one… I just can't quite put my finger on it…

Posted: **Thu Jul 21, 2022 1:27 pm**

Reworked the draft to reflect my current style, and removed a claim liable to hook on the bad side of the Honest Mistake rule.

Posted: **Thu Jul 21, 2022 1:52 pm**

I unironically love clause 2. If you include some version of the "august" (But not "most excellent" -- look at the proposal, most excellent is a ranking of world assemblies, thus as the only world assembly, this one by must occupy both first and last spot on the list) comments from Ara and D&B, I'll look into photoshopping a medal for you.

Posted: **Thu Jul 21, 2022 2:31 pm**

Attempted Socialism wrote:I unironically love clause 2. If you include some version of the "august" (But not "most excellent" -- look at the proposal, most excellent is a ranking of world assemblies, thus as the only world assembly, this one by must occupy both first and last spot on the list) comments from Ara and D&B, I'll look into photoshopping a medal for you.

Ask and you shall receive.

Posted: **Thu Jul 21, 2022 3:06 pm**

Wallenburg wrote:
Attempted Socialism wrote:I unironically love clause 2. If you include some version of the "august" (But not "most excellent" -- look at the proposal, most excellent is a ranking of world assemblies, thus as the only world assembly, this one by must occupy both first and last spot on the list) comments from Ara and D&B, I'll look into photoshopping a medal for you.

Ask and you shall receive.

Is this how an Orange Julius is made?

And I promise to faff around in Gimp until I have something that probably won't bleed your eyes and can, with some generosity of spirit, be called a medal.

Posted: **Thu Jul 21, 2022 3:12 pm**

Parts 1(b) and 1(c) are based

Also, the ‘August’ assembly joke again, I like it,

Posted: **Sat Jul 23, 2022 6:48 am**

Dr Justin Obama, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs: Does 'essential' refer to something specific or is just a general term for crucial services? If so, I do wonder the validity of your first clause, as it states that 'crucial' services will be denied, yet the target only mentions 'inessential'. Do correct me if I'm wrong though.

Posted: **Wed Jul 05, 2023 12:33 pm**

Hearing input on this one last time before I submit it.

Posted: **Wed Jul 05, 2023 1:43 pm**

OOC: The 3rd paragraph I question a bit. I don't believe "august" was used in the context of a month, however I'll admit I'm not entirely sure.

Posted: **Wed Jul 05, 2023 2:42 pm**

Wallenburg wrote:Similarly, it claims to be the act of an "august" World Assembly when it was plainly passed in October.

OOC: Far be it from me to suggest that a proposal drafted by a member of GenSec might be illegal, but as amusing as this is (Make Legislation Funny Again!), I feel as if this might be a Real World Reference (for referencing the real month of October) and Meta-Gaming (breaking the fourth wall by referencing when the target was passed IRL). I dearly hope that this isn't illegal, but I'm not sure if this would survive a legality challenge.

Posted: **Wed Jul 05, 2023 2:53 pm**

"I would direct my fellow ambassadors to the inclusion of the month of January in GAR #600. I am willing to fight the matter out before the Secretariat if need be."

NationStates

[DRAFT] Repeal "Public Health and Vaccinations Act"