Page 2 of 2
Posted:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 5:21 pmby Separatist Peoples
Quiver wrote:The New California Republic wrote:OOC: Against. Not that it will pass anyway, because many have tried and failed to repeal it, as everyone knows that any repeal will open up the floodgates to proposals that want to implement a total abortion ban. It's the same with NAPA, people don't want it repealed, as it acts as a blocker to follow-on proposals that aim to ban nuclear weapons.
OOC: What is NAPA?
OOC: GAR#10, Nuclear Arms Possession Act. Which enshrines the right to own nuclear weapons in WA nations.
Posted:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 5:42 pmby Eastern Don Mard
Although I do agree that there should be some restrictions, there is also the point that as everyone has stated. This will never pass as so many people have already voted and you don't have a very convincing or compelling argument.
Posted:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:45 pmby Faltasia
Quiver wrote:The New California Republic wrote:OOC: Against. Not that it will pass anyway, because many have tried and failed to repeal it, as everyone knows that any repeal will open up the floodgates to proposals that want to implement a total abortion ban. It's the same with NAPA, people don't want it repealed, as it acts as a blocker to follow-on proposals that aim to ban nuclear weapons.
OOC: What is NAPA?
No Action Punch Only. Kidding. Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act 1978.
Posted:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:47 pmby New Excalibus
Like the base idea, because I'm biased against abortion. Might not pass though.
Posted:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:57 pmby Jebslund
Faltasia wrote:Quiver wrote:OOC: What is NAPA?
No Action Punch Only. Kidding. Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act 1978.
[OOC: Not even close, mate.]
Posted:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:00 pmby United Massachusetts
Jebslund wrote:United Massachusetts wrote:United Massachusetts supports any and every attempt to repeal so-called "Reproductive Freedoms", and is willing to the author in further drafting should they so desire.
Haven't you *already* authored a failed repeal attempt?
"We will triumph. You would be foolish to think that I do not have a plan. All in due time."
Posted:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:09 pmby Jebslund
United Massachusetts wrote:Jebslund wrote:Haven't you *already* authored a failed repeal attempt?
"We will triumph. You would be foolish to think that I do not have a plan. All in due time."
"You will fail. You have failed before, and will fail again."
Posted:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 8:39 pmby The Rhenish League
"The pure idea of trying to repeal 'Reproductive Freedoms' yet another time after all these failing attempts seems crazy enough that we would even consider voting for it. It hardly plays any role, since it is doomed to fail by nature, anyways."
Posted:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 4:49 amby Faltasia
It would appear that we have made the original poster not want to respond. Hmmm.
Posted:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 4:55 amby The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda
I already abandoned my hope that this passes so I am leaving it alone
Posted:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 5:05 amby Bears Armed
The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda wrote:I already abandoned my hope that this passes so I am leaving it alone
In that case, please change the '[Proposal]' in the title to '[ABANDONED]' -- by editing the first post -- so that people who see it in the list of threads will know that there's no need to read it or respond.
Posted:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 5:06 amby Jebslund
The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda wrote:I already abandoned my hope that this passes so I am leaving it alone
[OOC: Then change [Proposal] to [Abandoned] so people know. You may also wish to withdraw it, if you're truly abandoning it.]
Posted:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:11 amby The New California Republic
Faltasia wrote:Quiver wrote:OOC: What is NAPA?
No Action Punch Only. Kidding. Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act 1978.
OOC: N...no...
Posted:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:24 amby Faltasia
The New California Republic wrote:Faltasia wrote:No Action Punch Only. Kidding. Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act 1978.
OOC: N...no...
Yea I realize my mistake haha.