by Democratic Empire of Romania » Thu Aug 30, 2018 10:46 am
by Kranostav » Thu Aug 30, 2018 11:14 am
The Security Council,
by Democratic Empire of Romania » Thu Aug 30, 2018 11:29 am
Kranostav wrote:The Security Council,
Pssst.
Unless you are literally condemning artificial food, you won't get anywhere addressing the security council!
by Sierra Lyricalia » Thu Aug 30, 2018 2:23 pm
"Which is it, Ambassador? Are these things good for you or are they poisonous? Surely you can't have it both ways. Figure out what you're looking at and target your regulations to that thing only."Democratic Empire of Romania wrote:... These products were submitted to studies which proved that these foodstuffs are as healthy as normal food and more eco-friendly, along with being easier and cheaper to produce.
... Also, this means the produce of food with less nutritives. Concerning is that through genetical engineering, poison and toxic substances may be added.
"Ambassador, why are you creating a duplicate agency when WAFDRA is still alive and kicking, and perfectly capable of doing its job?"1. The World Assembly Food Regulation Commission ( WAFRC ) is created. It shall check the quality of food by various tests not limited to size, color, taste and nutritives.
by The New California Republic » Thu Aug 30, 2018 4:00 pm
Democratic Empire of Romania wrote:2. The WAFRC shall perform mandatory tests upon the food producers, to ensure that their products do not contain toxins, poison or other lethal chemical elements.
by Kowani » Thu Aug 30, 2018 6:02 pm
Democratic Empire of Romania wrote:Category : Health
Area of Effect : Bioethics
The General Assembly,
Notes that advancement in industry has led to the creation of artificial food, including meat, fruit and vegetables. These products were submitted to studies which proved that these foodstuffs are as healthy as normal food and more eco-friendly, along with being easier and cheaper to produce.
However, a lot of people make a living from producing natural food. The expansion of artificial food would lead to a high lose of jobs, thus the downfall of big food-based corporatiobs. This would lead to a economic crisis. Aren’t large food based corporations responsible for all the illnesses caused by pesticides anyway? Wouldn’t getting rid of the need for pesticides be good for, well, everyone?
The artificial food is produced through genetical engineering. Through this process, the product might be changed in color, taste or size. Also, this means the produce of food with less nutritives. Concerning is that through genetical engineering, poison and toxic substances may be added.
Through, poison and toxic substances are understood substances which might cause illness or death.
Thereby, the Security Council declares the following: Still not the SC, mate.
1. The World Assembly Food Regulation Commission ( WAFRC ) is created. It shall check the quality of food by various tests not limited to size, color, taste and nutritives.
2. The WAFRC shall perform mandatory tests upon the food producers, to ensure that their products do not contain toxins, poison or other lethal chemical elements. If you’re not running an anarchy, I find hard to believe that your national food regulation agency wouldn’t have done that anyway.
3. The tests' results will decide if the food is good for sale or not. If not, the products shall be phisically sealed away and eliminated. If they pass, they shall be given a certificate which stats that the food is eligible for trade. The certificate will be given with a special mark which shall be put on the sign stating the price.States, not stats. Also, don’t most nations worth their salt make sure that food is safe for sale anyway? And if they don’t, businesses will. Getting your customers sick is not good for business, unless you run the pharmaceutical industry.
Furtherly,
1. The falsification of the certificate shall be banned.
2. If one will falsificate the certificate and/or the mark, it shall be punished according to current law.
by Kenmoria » Fri Aug 31, 2018 4:14 am
by Democratic Empire of Romania » Fri Aug 31, 2018 4:47 am
Kenmoria wrote:“The current active clause does not, in my eyes, meet the criteria of bioethics, as it does not restrict medical research or care in any way. Also, please define ‘artificial food’ as a great number of foodstuffs do not occur in the wild, including bread.”
by Marafel » Fri Aug 31, 2018 4:56 am
by Omicron Convenience IV » Fri Aug 31, 2018 8:40 am
by Imperium Anglorum » Fri Aug 31, 2018 8:52 am
by The New California Republic » Fri Aug 31, 2018 9:09 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:How would this proposal interact with this: viewtopic.php?p=668491#p668491 ?
by Democratic Empire of Romania » Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:37 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Imperium Anglorum wrote:How would this proposal interact with this: viewtopic.php?p=668491#p668491 ?
OOC: The previous edits were actually far more contradictory in relation to WAR #64, but unfortunately the OP has not kept the previous edits. A previous edit still appears in Kowani's comment above though. In comparison to the content in the previous edits, the current draft is basically an entirely new proposal, bearing little resemblance to the previous drafts...
by Wallenburg » Sat Sep 01, 2018 3:20 pm
by Kowani » Sat Sep 01, 2018 3:59 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement