by Knessniet » Sat Aug 25, 2018 4:22 pm
KNN: Knessian News Network This feature is set to be disabled in favor of our new news outlet!
by The Sakhalinsk Empire » Sat Aug 25, 2018 7:51 pm
by Cosmopolitan borovan » Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:29 pm
by Knessniet » Sun Aug 26, 2018 6:04 am
KNN: Knessian News Network This feature is set to be disabled in favor of our new news outlet!
by Kenmoria » Sun Aug 26, 2018 6:15 am
by The New California Republic » Sun Aug 26, 2018 7:37 am
Knessniet wrote:1. Hereby mandate that nations must share evidence of crimes committed. ... Such evidence includes incriminating ... video ... A nation may withold evidence if they have reasonable suspicion that the accused's human rights are or will be violated.
by Knessniet » Sun Aug 26, 2018 8:16 am
The New California Republic wrote:Knessniet wrote:1. Hereby mandate that nations must share evidence of crimes committed. ... Such evidence includes incriminating ... video ... A nation may withold evidence if they have reasonable suspicion that the accused's human rights are or will be violated.
OOC: Uh, what if said video evidence is of a rape? The CCTV video of that rape will be shared internationally? Can you imagine what kind of additional trauma that would cause to the victim of the rape, knowing that people across the world are going to see it?
KNN: Knessian News Network This feature is set to be disabled in favor of our new news outlet!
by Knessniet » Sun Aug 26, 2018 8:16 am
Kenmoria wrote:“Clause 1 needs heavy clarification since it currently refers to all crimes, which could be very bad indeed. For example, if someone releases classified information, sharing that internationally could be a very bad idea. It could also violate the privacy of crime victims to have their details shared across the globe.”
KNN: Knessian News Network This feature is set to be disabled in favor of our new news outlet!
by Knessniet » Sun Aug 26, 2018 9:43 am
KNN: Knessian News Network This feature is set to be disabled in favor of our new news outlet!
by Tinhampton » Sun Aug 26, 2018 10:41 am
Knessniet wrote:If there are no more concerns, I would like to propose this. Please inform me of any more concerns by Monday.
by Knessniet » Sun Aug 26, 2018 10:44 am
KNN: Knessian News Network This feature is set to be disabled in favor of our new news outlet!
by Cosmopolitan borovan » Sun Aug 26, 2018 10:49 am
by Knessniet » Sun Aug 26, 2018 10:55 am
Cosmopolitan borovan wrote:You can clarify this is for extrajudicial or cross border crimes in your preamble
KNN: Knessian News Network This feature is set to be disabled in favor of our new news outlet!
by Dawn Kingdom » Mon Aug 27, 2018 3:21 pm
by The New California Republic » Mon Aug 27, 2018 3:26 pm
Dawn Kingdom wrote:OOC:What if the accused person is influental politician, oligarch, celebrity, we cannot pose them as criminals, unless government sees some profit in deposing the very person.
Dawn Kingdom wrote: In that case we can even make some "evidence". This is another anti-corruption proposal.
by Dawn Kingdom » Mon Aug 27, 2018 3:37 pm
The New California Republic wrote:All replies OOC.Dawn Kingdom wrote:OOC:What if the accused person is influental politician, oligarch, celebrity, we cannot pose them as criminals, unless government sees some profit in deposing the very person.
...what??Dawn Kingdom wrote: In that case we can even make some "evidence". This is another anti-corruption proposal.
No...it isn't...
by The New California Republic » Mon Aug 27, 2018 3:40 pm
Dawn Kingdom wrote:2.) If really influential politician is the accused person what should we do? Give reasonable evidence to lock him up in the cell? This wouldn't decrease his influence, but his hatred might grow, but if we will fake the court session, then government might have strong loyal politician on it's side. Same goes for oligarchs/billionairs. We can sabotage accused billionaires into paying government operations, this would benefit our economy quite a much. In exchange we can make evidence dissapear, to ensure releasing of billionaire.
3.) If government sees profit in locking someone in the jail cell, then government might fake some evidence to ensure person's seizure.
by Dawn Kingdom » Mon Aug 27, 2018 3:47 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Dawn Kingdom wrote:2.) If really influential politician is the accused person what should we do? Give reasonable evidence to lock him up in the cell? This wouldn't decrease his influence, but his hatred might grow, but if we will fake the court session, then government might have strong loyal politician on it's side. Same goes for oligarchs/billionairs. We can sabotage accused billionaires into paying government operations, this would benefit our economy quite a much. In exchange we can make evidence dissapear, to ensure releasing of billionaire.
3.) If government sees profit in locking someone in the jail cell, then government might fake some evidence to ensure person's seizure.
What?? The draft says none of this nonsense. You are reading something into it that isn't even there...
by The New California Republic » Mon Aug 27, 2018 3:50 pm
by The New California Republic » Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:01 pm
Knessniet wrote:a. Such evidence includes incriminating documents, video, audio, and photographic media.
by Dawn Kingdom » Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:11 pm
by The New California Republic » Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:15 pm
Dawn Kingdom wrote:The New California Republic wrote:This is about evidence sharing across international borders, I really don't think that you understand what it is saying...
I understand it perfectly. Would you share evidence against your strong politician/oligarch across international borders? We not bribe them with faking evidence, but that is discussion for another day.
by Imperium Anglorum » Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:48 pm
by The New California Republic » Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:50 pm
Imperium Anglorum wrote:The Compliance Commission can already demand evidence.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: The Galactic Supremacy
Advertisement