Page 7 of 7

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 12:19 pm
by Separatist Peoples
Kuwi wrote:
The Unfounded wrote:
Voluntarily entered a multinational organization that can be entered and left at any time for any reason or no reason at all; claims the nation doing so does not possess the same level of freedom as their other nations.

The cognitive dissonance is quite apropos. It would be nice to refrain from OOC chatter in an RP thread, though. And yes this is an RP thread.

Kuwi isn’t up to WA code merely because it just joined and hasn’t applied it all yet

OOC: Then you're crowing about nothing.

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 12:22 pm
by Die PreuBen Kaiserreich
While you do make good points, I still do not support this resolution. I believe if this is repealed it will hamper on free speech. If a woman doesn't want an abortion, she can just not go there or say she doesn't want an abortion.

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 3:44 pm
by United New England
Kuwi wrote:
United New England wrote:
Merriam-Webster’s first definition of “inside” is “an interior or internal part or place : the part within”.

An what are the other definitions?

Here are the other, less-relevant definitions, although next time I think you could probably manage your own web search:

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:05 am
by Araraukar
Uan aa Boa wrote:Ladies and gentlemen, the delegation tabling this proposal were very clear in their request that this not be used as a forum for discussing the ethics of abortion.

OOC: Given that the reasons for IC support or lack of support tend to be based on the ethics of the nations involved, that's either an impossible request or an attempt to shut down any opposition. Neither of which will fly very far.

But I do agree that by the time you need to drag up Merriam-Webster to define "inside", you've gone too far. :P

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2018 6:29 pm
by Auze
So... Is this still up?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2018 6:35 pm
by Imperium Anglorum
No idea why you bumped it, but this will almost certainly be defeated if proposed.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 8:41 am
by Thyerata
We *really* don't think this is a good idea. We hold the rights of free choice to be paramount - particularly since, in Thytian law, a foetus is not alive until it is born as a baby.

Doubtless your "replacement" will be as restrictive as humanly possible.


PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 9:33 am
by Separatist Peoples
"My government does not oppose this. It doesnt especially support it, but it cares little for WA interference on the matter. I remain ambivalent. My love for irritating zealots tips me against."