Page 5 of 5

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:29 am
by Kenmoria
Reduce Unnecessary Food Wastage
Category: Social Justice | Strength: Mild | Proposed by: Australian rePublic, Cute Puppies, Kenmoria
________________________________________
The World Assembly,

Noticing that many organisations, who grow, prepare, sell and/or distribute food have lots of wastage because they order too much for the required amount, causing the excessive food to go to waste,

Further, some farmers/retailers refuse to sell fruit and vegetables if they're considered "too ugly",

Recognising the fact that much of this wastage is still edible, and its waste is therefore unneeded and damaging,

Concerned over the many tonnes of food that unintentionally expires due to improper or incorrect stock rotation,

Worried for the many negative effects of such food wastage on WA member states, including:

a. Detrimentality to the environment. Food which ends up in landfill is detrimental to the environment, for example, some of the problems include producing methane, wasting fresh water which was used to create it, and wasting arable land, amongst many other environmental issues with misusing food,

b. Robbing the poor of the ability to eat perfectly edible food which goes into the bin. Edible food being products that are still safe for sapient consumption,

c. Food production being a very labour-intensive task, which is in vain if the food is not eaten,

This resolution suggests that food hygiene, food safety and quarantine should take precedence, but in the situations where food is found to be perfectly edible, this proposal aims to reduce the prevalence of food wastage,

Hereby,
  1. Strongly encourages member nations to create local initiatives that seek to prevent the overproduction and disposal of viable and still-edible food including food banks and charities;

  2. Urges member nations to inform their citizens about how to properly save and store leftovers for future consumption;

  3. Obligates member nations to manage food surpluses and the excessive wastage of food through eco-friendly and constructive ways including but not limited to:
    1. Diverting food scraps to animal feed,
    2. Composting inedible food to create nutrient-rich soil,
    3. Use waste oils from food for fuel conversion and food scraps for the recover energy in industrial processes,
    4. Noting however, that nations are exempt from this clause, should they believe that said food poses a quarantine/bio-security threat;
  4. Extends the authority of the International Food Welfare Organization to:
    1. Establish food banks and charities in member nations with their permission,
    2. Research the most practical and environmentally-friendly methods of food decomposition.
Code: Select all
Reduce Unnecessary Food Wastage
Category: Social Justice | Strength: Mild | Proposed by: Australian rePublic, Cute Puppies, Kenmoria
________________________________________
The World Assembly,

Noticing that many organisations, who grow, prepare, sell and/or distribute food have lots of wastage because they order too much for the required amount, causing the excessive food to go to waste,

Further, some farmers/retailers refuse to sell fruit and vegetables if they're considered "too ugly",

Recognising the fact that much of this wastage is still edible, and its waste is therefore unneeded and damaging,

Concerned over the many tonnes of food that unintentionally expires due to improper or incorrect stock rotation,

Worried for the many negative effects of such food wastage on WA member states, including:

a. Detrimentality to the environment. Food which ends up in landfill is detrimental to the environment, for example, some of the problems include producing methane, wasting fresh water which was used to create it, and wasting arable land, amongst many other environmental issues with misusing food,

b. Robbing the poor of the ability to eat perfectly edible food which goes into the bin. Edible food being products that are still safe for sapient consumption,

c. Food production being a very labour-intensive task, which is in vain if the food is not eaten,

This resolution suggests that food hygiene, food safety and quarantine should take precedence, but in the situations where food is found to be perfectly edible, this proposal aims to reduce the prevalence of food wastage,

Hereby,
[list=1]
[*] Strongly encourages member nations to create local initiatives that seek to prevent the overproduction and disposal of viable and still-edible food including food banks and charities;


[*] Urges member nations to inform their citizens about how to properly save and store leftovers for future consumption;


[*] Obligates member nations to manage food surpluses and the excessive wastage of food through eco-friendly and constructive ways including but not limited to:[list=a]
[*] Diverting food scraps to animal feed,
[*] Composting inedible food to create nutrient-rich soil,
[*] Use waste oils from food for fuel conversion and food scraps for the recover energy in industrial processes,
[*] Noting however, that nations are exempt from this clause, should they believe that said food poses a quarantine/bio-security threat;[/list]
[*] Extends the authority of the International Food Welfare Organization to:
[list=a][*] Establish food banks and charities in member nations with their permission,
[*] Research the most practical and environmentally-friendly methods of food decomposition.[/list][/list]
(OOC: I've redone the lists so that they use the [list] code and therefore stand out a bit more. Also, co-authors should go at the bottom like this: “Co-authored by Nation1 and Nation2”, when you actually submit the proposal.)

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 6:08 am
by Zone 71
Looks like a great draft. Could you credit my main nation, nation]Dmitry II[/nation], in my/Cute Puppies' place?

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 6:09 am
by Australian rePublic
Zone 71 wrote:Looks like a great draft. Could you credit my main nation, nation]Dmitry II[/nation], in my/Cute Puppies' place?

Dmitry Il? Ok

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 6:16 am
by Zone 71
Australian rePublic wrote:
Zone 71 wrote:Looks like a great draft. Could you credit my main nation, nation]Dmitry II[/nation], in my/Cute Puppies' place?

Dmitry Il? Ok

Thanks. Also, because multiple people cannot propose a single proposal, it's customary to credit co-authors in the bottom of the proposal.

In this case, you would write, at the end of your proposal

Code: Select all
Co-authored by [nation]Dmitry II[/nation] and [nation]Kenmoria[/nation]

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 6:23 am
by Australian rePublic
Zone 71 wrote:
Australian rePublic wrote:Dmitry Il? Ok

Thanks. Also, because multiple people cannot propose a single proposal, it's customary to credit co-authors in the bottom of the proposal.

In this case, you would write, at the end of your proposal

Code: Select all
Co-authored by [nation]Dmitry II[/nation] and [nation]Kenmoria[/nation]

Ok

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 6:23 am
by Australian rePublic
Should I submit Kenmoria's draft now?

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 6:32 am
by Zone 71
I would wait for more responses and constructive criticism from others, but it looks like a solid proposal.

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 10:46 am
by Araraukar
Australian rePublic wrote:Should I submit Kenmoria's draft now?

OOC: If you submit Kenmoria's draft without their explicit permission to submit it as is, you can get dinged for plagiarism.

Also, if the text in the first post is the most current, it's a mess. Both as formatting and as text. Is that the most current one and if not, post the most current one there.

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:40 pm
by Kenmoria
Araraukar wrote:
Australian rePublic wrote:Should I submit Kenmoria's draft now?

OOC: If you submit Kenmoria's draft without their explicit permission to submit it as is, you can get dinged for plagiarism.
(OOC: I give my permission for Australian rePublic to submit my draft. Also, given that is the most recent one, put it in the opening post.)

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:43 pm
by Australian rePublic
Araraukar wrote:
Australian rePublic wrote:Should I submit Kenmoria's draft now?

OOC: If you submit Kenmoria's draft without their explicit permission to submit it as is, you can get dinged for plagiarism.

Also, if the text in the first post is the most current, it's a mess. Both as formatting and as text. Is that the most current one and if not, post the most current one there.

I'm not stealing anything. He/she already agreed to be credited as a co-author

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:46 pm
by Dmitry II
Australian rePublic wrote:
Araraukar wrote:OOC: If you submit Kenmoria's draft without their explicit permission to submit it as is, you can get dinged for plagiarism.

Also, if the text in the first post is the most current, it's a mess. Both as formatting and as text. Is that the most current one and if not, post the most current one there.

I'm not stealing anything. He/she already agreed to be credited as a co-author


I have to agree with Araraukar. There are a number of mistakes both grammatically and formatting-wise. I will not give you my blessing to propose this to the GA if you don't fix these simple but very frequent errors.

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:47 pm
by Australian rePublic
Dmitry II wrote:
Australian rePublic wrote:I'm not stealing anything. He/she already agreed to be credited as a co-author


I have to agree with Araraukar. There are a number of mistakes both grammatically and formatting-wise. I will not give you my blessing to propose this to the GA if you don't fix these simple but very frequent errors.

Yea I can't fix those things on my own. (I think I might be dyslexic)

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:31 pm
by Kenmoria
"Would you mind explaining the category. I'm not saying it's wrong, but knowing your reasoning could be helpful."

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:41 pm
by Araraukar
Kenmoria wrote:"Would you mind explaining the category. I'm not saying it's wrong, but knowing your reasoning could be helpful."

OOC: I think it's some kind of "feeding the poor" idea, but not very well executed.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 3:24 pm
by Australian rePublic
Kenmoria wrote:"Would you mind explaining the category. I'm not saying it's wrong, but knowing your reasoning could be helpful."

I just did what I was told...

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 3:37 pm
by Australian rePublic
Mentoka wrote:
Australian rePublic wrote:Yea I can't fix those things on my own. (I think I might be dyslexic)

So this is actually nothing more than a badge hunt to you? Good to know.

OOC:

Image


http://lmgtfy.com/?s=b&q=Dyslexia


Image

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 3:38 pm
by The Democracy of Red Star
Hmm

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 3:47 pm
by Dmitry II
OOC: While I don't want to sound rude or entitled, I don't feel comfortable giving the proposal author permission to use my work (the mandates section) if he or she cannot make a significant contribution to the proposal beyond a preamble (that was heavily modified by Kenmoria), take suggestions from others, and do his or her part in making sure the proposal, at the very least, has proper grammar and formatting.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:15 pm
by Araraukar
Dmitry II wrote:OOC: While I don't want to sound rude or entitled, I don't feel comfortable giving the proposal author permission to use my work (the mandates section) if he or she cannot make a significant contribution to the proposal beyond a preamble (that was heavily modified by Kenmoria), take suggestions from others, and do his or her part in making sure the proposal, at the very least, has proper grammar and formatting.

OOC: Nor do you have to. They basically got you and Kenmoria to write the proposal for them, and are asking for a free ride by having you two do all the editing, claiming dyslexia prevent them from doing so. (Would be a very odd dyslexia, since to my knowledged dyslexia doesn't include the inability to insert line breaks or hit the enter to separate things onto their separate lines.) You can simply deny them the use of your work as is.

To author, if you truly are incapable of working with your coposters rather than them doing all the word for you, perhaps this part of the text-based game that is NationStates is not for you. Hang around, RP in other people's proposal threads, get the feel of how this part of NS works. Dyslexia hasn't prevented people from partaking in the past, but you can't expect others to do all the work.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:38 pm
by Australian rePublic
If you 2 want the draft, take it. I'm out

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:46 pm
by Dmitry II
Australian rePublic wrote:If you 2 want the draft, take it. I'm out

Wow. I have no words.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:30 pm
by Kenmoria
Australian rePublic wrote:If you 2 want the draft, take it. I'm out

Okay, have better luck next time then, if you choose to stick around.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 3:30 am
by Australian rePublic
Kenmoria wrote:
Australian rePublic wrote:If you 2 want the draft, take it. I'm out

Okay, have better luck next time then, if you choose to stick around.

Thanks for being nice to me. I might try again in the future