Minimum duration for passed resolutions

[Jabberwocky]

I lack an adequate command of the redundant circumlocutions and verbose obfuscations necessary to actually draft a proposal, but doubtless one of you geniuses does. To wit, I suggest that any passed resolution should endure for a minimum time period, perhaps a year.. Given that the very fact that it passed is evidence of the will of the voters, to immediately attempt to repeal it is simply a procedural pissing contest, and a waste of time. I suspect I am not the only one who thinks this.

[Essu Beti]

“No. Noooooo,” says Iksana. “If you don’t want insta-repeals, don’t pass shitty resolutions.”

[Deropia]

"What Ambassador Iksana said," MacAlister says, propping his feet up on his desk "I don't have enough fingers or toes to count the number of times we've had to insta-repeal an absolute turd of a resolution because it managed to slip through on a fluffy-feel-good name or someone campaigning the shit out of it."

[Araraukar]

OOC: A ban on insta-repeals isn't something the GA can actually do, such a suggestion would belong in the Technical forum. Though I suggest not Jabberwockying the suggestion if you do post it there.

[Kenmoria]

"Repealing something soon after it is passed can be neccessary if the passed resolution contains an obvious flaw that was not spotted ruling voting. I also doubt you'll find much support for one of us to draft it for you."

(OOC: also, creating a time limit is something the GA can't do and belongs in Technical, where it would have to be coded by the admins.)

[Separatist Peoples]

Ooc: no.

[The Greater Siriusian Domain]

“No. Noooooo,” says Iksana. “If you don’t want insta-repeals, don’t pass shitty resolutions.”

Teran Saber: "The Greater Siriusian Domain seconds this notion."

[Wrapper]

OOC: A ban on insta-repeals isn't something the GA can actually do, such a suggestion would belong in the Technical forum. Though I suggest not Jabberwockying the suggestion if you do post it there.

This. Thread locked.