The New California Republic wrote:Latrovia wrote:Gentlemen, I am sorry that you see it in that way. But we changed what we thought that it needed to be changed. Of course, as you understand, too many cooks spoil a soup. And as you are aware, unfortunately, we can not implement everyone's ideas on the Acts, but we can revise and select a few of them. If you have any suggestions about the wording, please provide your own examples. It'd be a tone of help, instead of sending us back and forth, thinking again and again what we should change now, in order to please the crowds.
Thank you in advance!
OOC: I put it to you again: how can we comment on something that has not been posted here in the form of a draft, and how exactly can any suggestions be put into a proposal that has already been submitted?
Please listen, instead of constantly using these cut-and-paste platitude statements...
Would you like me to post it so you can revise it with your time?