NationStates

United North American Commonwealths wrote:Repeal “Nuclear Arms Possession Act”
A proposal to repeal a previously passed WA resolution #10

Category: Repeal
Resolution: #10
Proposed by: Federation of United North American Commonwealths

Description:
Understanding that WA members are allowed to possess nuclear weapons to defend themselves from hostile nations and realizing that the WA members need to be able to defend themselves if attacked.

Also acknowledging that non-member states are not required to abide by WA proposals,

But also acknowledging that this resolution allows WA States build excessive arsenals of nuclear weapons that are more than needed to defend their own Individual nations and only promotes more militarization that leads to bigger deadlier conflicts that further destabilizes The World Assembly's goal of Peace and Partnership.

The World Assembly hereby repeals “Nuclear Arms Possession Act.”

Willania Imperium wrote:

United North American Commonwealths wrote:Repeal “Nuclear Arms Possession Act”
A proposal to repeal a previously passed WA resolution #10

Category: Repeal
Resolution: #10
Proposed by: Federation of United North American Commonwealths

Description:
Understanding that WA members are allowed to possess nuclear weapons to defend themselves from hostile nations and realizing that the WA members need to be able to defend themselves if attacked.

Also acknowledging that non-member states are not required to abide by WA proposals,

But also acknowledging that this resolution allows WA States build excessive arsenals of nuclear weapons that are more than needed to defend their own Individual nations and only promotes more militarization that leads to bigger deadlier conflicts that further destabilizes The World Assembly's goal of Peace and Partnership.

The World Assembly hereby repeals “Nuclear Arms Possession Act.”

"Opposed. The resolution you are trying to repeal allows many WA nations that are weak a way to protect ourselves against non-WA nations that have more firepower. Hell, my nation is a far cry from the days of its Imperial motherland, but our ability to own nukes ensures that we are given the safety we've enjoyed and used to create our advanced nation. We will not lose the right to do so and be a target by other nations."

United North American Commonwealths wrote:

Willania Imperium wrote:
"Opposed. The resolution you are trying to repeal allows many WA nations that are weak a way to protect ourselves against non-WA nations that have more firepower. Hell, my nation is a far cry from the days of its Imperial motherland, but our ability to own nukes ensures that we are given the safety we've enjoyed and used to create our advanced nation. We will not lose the right to do so and be a target by other nations."

But what if we united our stockpiles for use by the World Assembly we would be unstoppable?

United North American Commonwealths wrote:

Wallenburg wrote:Nuclear weapons are a stabilizing and peacekeeping force. Against.

But don't you think the current stockpile is excessive?

Willania Imperium wrote:

United North American Commonwealths wrote:
But what if we united our stockpiles for use by the World Assembly we would be unstoppable?

"Are you listening to yourself? As bad as it is to strip nations what may be their last bullet, to allow an organization such an almost unstoppable power is worse! This violates a nation's right to self-defense by taking away their weapon! What level of madness are you on?"

United North American Commonwealths wrote:

Willania Imperium wrote:
"Are you listening to yourself? As bad as it is to strip nations what may be their last bullet, to allow an organization such an almost unstoppable power is worse! This violates a nation's right to self-defense by taking away their weapon! What level of madness are you on?"

Nothing Bad would Happen if it was Controlled and Regulated Properly.

Gig em Aggies wrote:I suggest looking at the past attempts of getting rid of nukes and build from their.

United North American Commonwealths wrote:

Willania Imperium wrote:
"Are you listening to yourself? As bad as it is to strip nations what may be their last bullet, to allow an organization such an almost unstoppable power is worse! This violates a nation's right to self-defense by taking away their weapon! What level of madness are you on?"

Nothing Bad would Happen if it was Controlled and Regulated Properly.

United North American Commonwealths wrote:

Willania Imperium wrote:
"Are you listening to yourself? As bad as it is to strip nations what may be their last bullet, to allow an organization such an almost unstoppable power is worse! This violates a nation's right to self-defense by taking away their weapon! What level of madness are you on?"

Nothing Bad would Happen if it was Controlled and Regulated Properly.

Sierra Lyricalia wrote:I'd encourage you to stick around for a while and see how this place works - participate in drafting threads, page through the Passed Resolutions index (see "Extant Resolutions" in my signature below), and the like. Then, once you're a bit better versed in what areas of law are open for legislation, you can try again with your next idea.

United North American Commonwealths wrote:

The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:Teran Saber: "You're not the first person to try this. You're not the second, or the third, or the fourth either. And no one before you succeeded. What makes you think this attempt will be any different?"

Because I have Confidence that Nations Leaders will Understand the effects of Nuclear War and Take Steps to Prevent it.

The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:

United North American Commonwealths wrote:But What if We Gave control of all of the WA Member States Nuclear Weapons to the Security Council? Also how about we set up a System where if A Non-Member Attacks one WA Member State and Declare war on Them we have System Like NATO where if you declare war on one you are at war with all of them?

Teran Saber: "Increasing response times, adding another layer of bureaucracy, and no one would go for it."

OOC: AND that would be a metagaming violation. As far as the General Assembly is concerned, the Security Council doesn't exist.

United North American Commonwealths wrote:

Wallenburg wrote:Nuclear weapons are a stabilizing and peacekeeping force. Against.

But don't you think the current stockpile is excessive?

Sandessal wrote:It's pretty good

United North American Commonwealths wrote:I am making more detailed argument and a new topic for this.

United North American Commonwealths wrote:Our Proposal is for The World Assembly Make Member States Reduce there Nuclear Arsenals to Under 1,000 and Limit them to Tactical Nukes.

Xmara wrote:Arguing that there are far more peaceful and diplomatic approaches to dealing with foreign invaders,

Grays Harbor wrote:

Xmara wrote:Arguing that there are far more peaceful and diplomatic approaches to dealing with foreign invaders,

Please, enlighten us what these "peaceful and diplomatic approaches" to an invasion in progress are? That sounds, at best, wishful thinking, and leans closer to dangerously naive.

Aide: "Mr Prime Minister, we just had 4 airborne divisions drop on the capitol!"

PM: "Invite them to tea. We can work this out peacefully, I am certain. The WA says so. Thank the Gods they didn't have nukes, that would have been horrible, right?"

United North American Commonwealths wrote:you can find it here: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=429495

United North American Commonwealths wrote:

Willania Imperium wrote:
"Are you listening to yourself? As bad as it is to strip nations what may be their last bullet, to allow an organization such an almost unstoppable power is worse! This violates a nation's right to self-defense by taking away their weapon! What level of madness are you on?"

Nothing Bad would Happen if it was Controlled and Regulated Properly.

Letheny wrote:"The Kingdom of Letheny would like to retain its stockpile - how else would we protect our citizens across the globe?"

AN, OOC: holy shit chill out

United North American Commonwealths wrote:

Willania Imperium wrote:
"Are you listening to yourself? As bad as it is to strip nations what may be their last bullet, to allow an organization such an almost unstoppable power is worse! This violates a nation's right to self-defense by taking away their weapon! What level of madness are you on?"

Nothing Bad would Happen if it was Controlled and Regulated Properly.

United North American Commonwealths wrote:

Willania Imperium wrote:
"Are you listening to yourself? As bad as it is to strip nations what may be their last bullet, to allow an organization such an almost unstoppable power is worse! This violates a nation's right to self-defense by taking away their weapon! What level of madness are you on?"

Nothing Bad would Happen if it was Controlled and Regulated Properly.

Union of Euro Soviet States wrote: Bougwa

Tinfect wrote:

Union of Euro Soviet States wrote: Bougwa

OOC:
For the record, the word you're looking for is 'Bourgeois'.