Advertisement
by South Waziristan » Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:47 am
by Separatist Peoples » Fri Dec 08, 2017 8:19 am
Zarsistan wrote:The Democratic people's socialist republic(100% democracy) of Zarsistan COMPLETELY DENIES THE ELIMINATION OF NUKES, AS IT'S OUR ONLY WEAPON AGAINST WESTERN IMPERIALISTS.
by Separatist Peoples » Fri Dec 08, 2017 9:23 am
Zarsistan wrote:Propaganda! 0% famine in our great republic and our military can handle any western force!
by United North American Commonwealths » Sun Dec 10, 2017 12:13 pm
Chuching wrote:Official Statement by the Chuchingian Office of International Communication
Finally, the SCUMBAG WA, an organization filled with more gangsters than bottles of cognac DEAREST LEADER owns in his collection, has come up with an admirable idea.
There are two types of nations. There are those who embrace order, such as Chuching. These are the truly great nations. Rising above the fray of confusion, they achieve the most desirable form of govenment. There are no more filthy protestors, seeking to bring about chaos. There is no more incessant bickering; just the will of the ever-superior ruler. And then, there are democracies. These despicable nations, rather than attempting to combat the forces of anarchy, they embrace them. The capitols of these idiotic nations are filled with a cacophony of bickering over completely irrelevant topics, with anything achieved a laughable Frankenstein of components each attempting to satisfy political minorities depended upon to pass it. For a good laugh, the Divine Arch-Generalissimo, savior of the Chuchingian people, claims he likes to watch the C-Span of nearby democracies!
Now take every democracy you can imagine. An unfathomable volume of manure captured by this very thought. Now place it all in one organization : the "World Assembly". Criminals walk the halls, demanding provisions on bills in exchange for their blood money to the campaigns of respective ambassadors. Frequent laudation of democracy, freedom, and human rights, all disgusting concepts to the eye of any sane person, occurs. And worst of all? Democracy, in its purest form, is practiced. All of the silly verbal combat mentioned above occurs with great frequency. But most disturbing of all is the SCUMBAG WA's organization to impose an international bureaucracy upon all. Even national democracies lack the the resources to spread the virulent democratic plague effectively. But the SCUMBAG WA? It certainly does. It has been known to encourage democracy in all nations; it has become a deliberate transmitter of the deadliest moral corruptor.
Like knowing spreaders of any malady, the SCUMBAG WA deserves to be immediately exterminated. But the only problem? It encourages its members to have nuclear weapons. An eternal arms race ensues, with mutually assured destruction preventing us from eliminating the great rot. That is where this new proposal comes in. Disarming all members of the SCUMBAG WA would allow the virus to be finally eliminated in the cleansing hell of nuclear fire. With our strongest voice, we encourage you! Go forwards with the proposal! Disarm! Disarm! DISARM!!!
by The Sheika » Sun Dec 10, 2017 12:32 pm
United North American Commonwealths wrote:I agree with you anyone that doesn't get rid of their weapons they can expect a nuclear Barrage in the next 10 Minutes...
by United North American Commonwealths » Sun Dec 10, 2017 12:38 pm
by Tinfect » Sun Dec 10, 2017 12:42 pm
United North American Commonwealths wrote:No one will Listen They will never Change and Someday When MAD Fails which it Eventually will. The Countries that Opposed my Repeal thier Leaders will think what they could have done to prevent it when their supplies run out in their Bunkers and they will have to go outside and see the consequences of Nuclear war.
Imperium Central News Network: EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL CITIZENS ARE TO PROCEED TO EVACUATION SITES IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL FURTHER SUBSPACE SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS ARE TO BE DISABLED IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: THE FOLLOWING SYSTEMS ARE ACCESS PROHIBITED BY STANDARD/BLACKOUT [Error: Format Unrecognized] | Indomitable Bastard #283
by Willania Imperium » Sun Dec 10, 2017 12:42 pm
United North American Commonwealths wrote:No one will Listen They will never Change and Someday When MAD Fails which it Eventually will. The Countries that Opposed my Repeal thier Leaders will think what they could have done to prevent it when their supplies run out in their Bunkers and they will have to go outside and see the consequences of Nuclear war.
by The Sheika » Sun Dec 10, 2017 12:51 pm
United North American Commonwealths wrote:No one will Listen They will never Change and Someday When MAD Fails which it Eventually will. The Countries that Opposed my Repeal thier Leaders will think what they could have done to prevent it when their supplies run out in their Bunkers and they will have to go outside and see the consequences of Nuclear war.
by The Greater Siriusian Domain » Sun Dec 10, 2017 1:24 pm
United North American Commonwealths wrote:I agree with you anyone that doesn't get rid of their weapons they can expect a nuclear Barrage in the next 10 Minutes...
United North American Commonwealths wrote:No one will Listen They will never Change and Someday When MAD Fails which it Eventually will. The Countries that Opposed my Repeal thier Leaders will think what they could have done to prevent it when their supplies run out in their Bunkers and they will have to go outside and see the consequences of Nuclear war.
by The New California Republic » Sun Dec 10, 2017 1:39 pm
The Sheika wrote:United North American Commonwealths wrote:No one will Listen They will never Change and Someday When MAD Fails which it Eventually will. The Countries that Opposed my Repeal thier Leaders will think what they could have done to prevent it when their supplies run out in their Bunkers and they will have to go outside and see the consequences of Nuclear war.
OOC: Ugh...the random capitalization is pointless.
by Serrus » Sun Dec 10, 2017 5:58 pm
Eastern Raarothorgren wrote:News websites are good and reasonable soruces of information or they would not be on the internet if they were saying things that were incorrect.
Keshiland wrote:I am yes arguing that the 1st 4 are not binding to the states and yes I know that in most Republican states they would ban the freedom of religion and the freedom of essembally but I don't live there and I hate guns!
by Xmara » Mon Dec 11, 2017 7:46 am
by Gregicstan » Mon Dec 11, 2017 7:52 am
by The New California Republic » Mon Dec 11, 2017 8:02 am
Gregicstan wrote:Nuclear weapons should not be regulated. This is because of they, even though deadly, saved many lives especially during the end of ww2. Also, without nuclear weapon research, the good from it like power plants and other energy sources would never come from it. Uranium today is used to save lives more than destroy it!
I feel that with nuclear weapons being allowed for research reasons and for the defence of a country will ensure everlasting peace and not war.
by Alpha Cassiopeiae » Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:10 pm
"I would love to see your country try to bomb us, a multiplanetary state whose closest planet is 54 light years away from you. Your threats, of course, pose a very interesting question - does your country have a nuclear weapons stockpile? I took a look through your factbooks and in fact, the UNAC publicly states that it has 6600 nuclear warheads prepared at the moment with active production of 20 a year. Is it not hypocritical, Ambassador, to suggest that the World Assembly give up its nuclear weapons when your country itself maintains a stockpile and actively produces nuclear weapons? Is it not hypocritical that you ask the nations of the Assembly to disarm when you are threatening to use them?"United North American Commonwealths wrote:No one will Listen They will never Change and Someday When MAD Fails which it Eventually will. The Countries that Opposed my Repeal thier Leaders will think what they could have done to prevent it when their supplies run out in their Bunkers and they will have to go outside and see the consequences of Nuclear war.
by Serrus » Tue Dec 12, 2017 5:53 pm
Xmara wrote:Serrus wrote:OOC: When I See random Capitalizing like This it makes me think they're Rambling like a Madperson.
OOC: I think of back when I was on the ROBLOX forums and people would post In All Caps Like This, and when you called them out on it, they’d go off on a rant about how they’re using proper grammar and you don’t know anything about the English language.
All while using “your” in place of “you’re,” and the wrong “there/their/they’re.”
Eastern Raarothorgren wrote:News websites are good and reasonable soruces of information or they would not be on the internet if they were saying things that were incorrect.
Keshiland wrote:I am yes arguing that the 1st 4 are not binding to the states and yes I know that in most Republican states they would ban the freedom of religion and the freedom of essembally but I don't live there and I hate guns!
by Dominatus (Ancient) » Tue Dec 12, 2017 5:56 pm
by Thermodolia » Wed Dec 13, 2017 6:58 am
Alpha Cassiopeiae wrote:"I would love to see your country try to bomb us, a multiplanetary state whose closest planet is 54 light years away from you. Your threats, of course, pose a very interesting question - does your country have a nuclear weapons stockpile? I took a look through your factbooks and in fact, the UNAC publicly states that it has 6600 nuclear warheads prepared at the moment with active production of 20 a year. Is it not hypocritical, Ambassador, to suggest that the World Assembly give up its nuclear weapons when your country itself maintains a stockpile and actively produces nuclear weapons? Is it not hypocritical that you ask the nations of the Assembly to disarm when you are threatening to use them?"United North American Commonwealths wrote:No one will Listen They will never Change and Someday When MAD Fails which it Eventually will. The Countries that Opposed my Repeal thier Leaders will think what they could have done to prevent it when their supplies run out in their Bunkers and they will have to go outside and see the consequences of Nuclear war.
by United North American Commonwealths » Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:47 pm
Tinfect wrote:United North American Commonwealths wrote:No one will Listen They will never Change and Someday When MAD Fails which it Eventually will. The Countries that Opposed my Repeal thier Leaders will think what they could have done to prevent it when their supplies run out in their Bunkers and they will have to go outside and see the consequences of Nuclear war.
"Please dispense with threats that you have no means of carrying out."
by United North American Commonwealths » Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:49 pm
The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:United North American Commonwealths wrote:I agree with you anyone that doesn't get rid of their weapons they can expect a nuclear Barrage in the next 10 Minutes...United North American Commonwealths wrote:No one will Listen They will never Change and Someday When MAD Fails which it Eventually will. The Countries that Opposed my Repeal thier Leaders will think what they could have done to prevent it when their supplies run out in their Bunkers and they will have to go outside and see the consequences of Nuclear war.
Teran Saber: "You do realize that some of the nations of the World Assembly are spacefaring, right? And if you manage to piss one off enough... well... let me give you an example of what happens."
Photo of the Greater Siriusian Domain's bombardment of the Siriusian Imperialist Movement Headquarters during the Siriusian Civil War
Teran Saber: "And that's with conventional weaponry. We managed to find a derelict vessel dating back to the Siriusian Civil War that may be armed with a weapon far more powerful than the entire firepower of a Thunderstorm-class Titan in the Hyades cluster recently, so in the near future our orbital bombardment capabilities may even be far greater."
"The Greater Siriusian Domain will consider ANY hostile action by the United North American Commonwealths against ANY WA member state as Casus Belli."
by The British Antarctic Federation » Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:50 pm
United North American Commonwealths wrote:We The Federation of United North American Commonwealths Urge The World Assembly to Make Member States Gradually Reduce their Nuclear Stockpiles. This would make the NationStates Community Safe from Nuclear annihilation and Refocus The World Assembly's Efforts to The Advancement of Peace. Also if Any Member States do not Comply be removed from the World Assembly. Our Proposal is for The World Assembly Make Member States Reduce there Nuclear Arsenals to Under 1,000 and Limit them to Tactical Nukes.
by United North American Commonwealths » Wed Dec 13, 2017 6:09 pm
Alpha Cassiopeiae wrote:"I would love to see your country try to bomb us, a multiplanetary state whose closest planet is 54 light years away from you. Your threats, of course, pose a very interesting question - does your country have a nuclear weapons stockpile? I took a look through your factbooks and in fact, the UNAC publicly states that it has 6600 nuclear warheads prepared at the moment with active production of 20 a year. Is it not hypocritical, Ambassador, to suggest that the World Assembly give up its nuclear weapons when your country itself maintains a stockpile and actively produces nuclear weapons? Is it not hypocritical that you ask the nations of the Assembly to disarm when you are threatening to use them?"United North American Commonwealths wrote:No one will Listen They will never Change and Someday When MAD Fails which it Eventually will. The Countries that Opposed my Repeal thier Leaders will think what they could have done to prevent it when their supplies run out in their Bunkers and they will have to go outside and see the consequences of Nuclear war.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement