Advertisement
by Tzorsland » Fri Oct 27, 2017 12:43 pm
by Dragonslinding WA Mission » Fri Oct 27, 2017 1:02 pm
Tzorsland wrote:Trying to make this "environmental" is trying to hammer a square peg into a round hole.
And, if that remark makes me a "shape bigot" I will gladly admit to it.
by The Sheika » Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:03 pm
by Republic of Keshiland » Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:06 pm
The Sheika wrote:Just for reiteration, the question has been asked several times and has gone unanswered, so here it is again.
How is this an international issue?
by The Sheika » Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:08 pm
by Dragonslinding WA Mission » Fri Oct 27, 2017 4:28 pm
by The Bible Baptist Republic » Fri Oct 27, 2017 5:54 pm
by Excidium Planetis » Fri Oct 27, 2017 5:55 pm
The Bible Baptist Republic wrote:How is this an international and/or environmental issue? Worthless currency is a national economic issue at best.
Republic of Keshiland wrote:Its not but it just make sense
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
News: AI wins Dawn Fleet election for High Counselor.
by The Greater Siriusian Domain » Fri Oct 27, 2017 6:01 pm
by Dragonslinding WA Mission » Fri Oct 27, 2017 6:40 pm
The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:Teran Saber: "And how would a purely digital currency be handled? Would it qualify as worthless, since the overhead of running any necessary accounting equipment would always be greater than the material value of something not even physical? Or would it not qualify as worthless as it literally costs nothing to make to begin with?"
by Excidium Planetis » Fri Oct 27, 2017 7:58 pm
The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:Teran Saber: "And how would a purely digital currency be handled? Would it qualify as worthless, since the overhead of running any necessary accounting equipment would always be greater than the material value of something not even physical? Or would it not qualify as worthless as it literally costs nothing to make to begin with?"
Dragonslinding WA Mission wrote:"An interesting question to be sure. But it also does not address those countries with a commodity based currency. A gold dragon for example will always be worth 15.55174g/Au. Stags worth their weight in silver, pennies in copper etc, etc, etc. Quite literally the only way even our smallest unit to become 'worthless' would require that gold, silver and copper not be desired."
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
News: AI wins Dawn Fleet election for High Counselor.
by Dragonslinding WA Mission » Fri Oct 27, 2017 8:15 pm
Excidium Planetis wrote:"Actually, quite literally the only way it becomes worthless is if the production costs exceed their buying power, according to the proposal." Blackbourne responds. "If it costs more than 15.55174 g/Au to produce a gold dragon, then it is worthless."
by The Bible Baptist Republic » Fri Oct 27, 2017 8:19 pm
Excidium Planetis wrote:The Bible Baptist Republic wrote:How is this an international and/or environmental issue? Worthless currency is a national economic issue at best.
"The author has already answered this question sufficiently." Blackbourne replies. "Here is their response:"Republic of Keshiland wrote:Its not but it just make sense
by Bears Armed » Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:05 am
Wrapper wrote:Finally, there is no possible way this is Environmental/Manufacturing. Environmental means it will "increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry." Making the penny worthless will have the opposite effect. There is no way any nation will be able to round up billions or trillions of pennies, and some will no doubt wind up in the environment, since they are now worthless. The net effect will be environmental harm, not benefit. In my opinion this is illegal as written. Again.
Bananaistan wrote:2) IRL Ireland and the UK withdrew the halfpenny in the mid 1980s. As far as I am aware, this did not lead to people simply chucking them into the bin. And there are countless international examples of low denomination coins being withdrawn from circulation and demonetised.
by Clean Land » Sat Oct 28, 2017 6:20 am
by Willania Imperium » Sat Oct 28, 2017 10:03 am
by Grays Harbor » Sat Oct 28, 2017 10:14 am
by Frisbeeteria » Sat Oct 28, 2017 11:12 am
Grays Harbor wrote:I have read this normally. I have read this in a mirror, looking for a hidden message. I have passed copies out to various random people on the street.
Nowhere can we find a valid reason for this.
by Oakrugia » Sat Oct 28, 2017 11:18 am
by The New California Republic » Sat Oct 28, 2017 11:36 am
Republic of Keshiland wrote:Discontinuation Of Worthless Currency Act
A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.
Category: Environmental Industry Affected: Manufacturing Proposed by: Republic of Keshiland
Preamble- The purpose of this legislation is to save WA nations money!
Defines- Worthless currency as any currency that is more expensive to mint or print than that of its buying power.
Requires- All WA member nations to stop minting or printing their worthless currency
Requires- All WA nations manufacturing mills to recycle worthless coins instead of throwing them away.
Edit that last part was purely to keep it legal for environmental since there was no category that fit this -_- Hopefully its enough to justify and keep legal
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement