Dragonslinding WA Mission wrote:OOC: I wasn't thinking of Rirten in particular, but was rather using it as an example of a primitive superstition usually attributed to societies that are often called barbaric. IE the local volcano periodically erupts, so throwing various persons into said volcano is believed to appease the local god of the volcano to make it not erupt. Realistically it does nothing but kill the person sacrificed, but from that society's point of view such sacrifices are absolutely vital to the well being of the whole./OOC
((OOC: I know what you meant. I'd hoped my little would make that clear?))
Dragonslinding WA Mission wrote:"Furthermore, religions themselves are ideologies. If the WA by its own rules cannot outright ban communism, or fascism, or democracy (which is perhaps the worst ideology out there--it always degenerates into mob-ocracy) then it stands to reason that it cannot outright ban religions. But if certain specific practices of those religions can be banned, and those practices are considered to be so intrinsic to the overall practice of that religion, that would be a de facto ideological ban on that religion. It would matter little if it is the religion of the volcano god of XYZ-istan or Christianity (which is a major religion in many member nations) or any other religion."
"Then wouldn't basically every resolution be an ideological ban, assuming infinite nations on infinite worlds, with accordingly infinite religions? I can think of a few just off the top of my head that-" Ixhua flips a booklet to a cheat-sheet of resolutions. "-insist on the genocide of nonbelievers, in contradiction of... #38? Or which involve slavery, in contradiction of #23. And there's one I know of in Nitch which defines oceanic territorial borders different from those listed in #168."