United Massachusetts wrote:Would this be best handled by an existing WA committee?Aclion wrote:On an unrelated note; UM, can you be more specific regarding " several neutral, well-qualified, analysts". How many is several, three? Out of how many, all of our scientists? What makes someone an analyst, is is just any qualified person who expresses an option? What opinion are legally relevant? Statements made under purjury? Twitter posts? Bathroom wall graffiti? Youtube comments?
Yes- I suggest... that one.