NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] Freedom to Seek Medical Care

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
New Waldensia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 432
Founded: Feb 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby New Waldensia » Sat Oct 21, 2017 7:04 pm

States of Glory WA Office wrote:Barbera: Some of the active clauses end with full stops while others end with commas. We recommend ensuring that there is consistency.

Noted, and correction made.
IC WA Diplomat Josiah Garrett
Author of GA #414 (Freedom to Seek Medical Care) and GA #456 (Freedom to Seek Medical Care II)

Army of Freedom medals received:
N-Day² Medals -- N-Day³ Medals -- N-Day⁴ Medals
Z-Day6 Medals

User avatar
Bananaistan
Senator
 
Posts: 3518
Founded: Apr 20, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bananaistan » Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:22 am

OOC: So under section 5 the patients must make the arrangements themselves and must pay for it but section 7 says that member states may pay for it. This makes no sense! Why are you so intent on leaving repeal hooks in this?

As they stand now, sections 1 & 2 are incomprehensible mouthfuls. I'd recommend rewriting both rather than just continuously appending exceptions and clarifications to both based on every little objection raised here.
Delegation of the People's Republic of Bananaistan to the World Assembly
Head of delegation and the Permanent Representative: Comrade Ambassador Theodorus "Ted" Hornwood
General Assistant and Head of Security: Comrade Watchman Brian of Tarth
There was the Pope and John F. Kennedy and Jack Charlton and the three of them were staring me in the face.
Ideological Bulwark #281
THIS

User avatar
Fauxia
Senator
 
Posts: 4827
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Fauxia » Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:28 am

Bananaistan wrote:OOC: So under section 5 the patients must make the arrangements themselves and must pay for it but section 7 says that member states may pay for it. This makes no sense! Why are you so intent on leaving repeal hooks in this?
It does make sense, in the same way another person can donate to the patient. I agree that Waldensia should probably rephrase it though.
Reploid Productions wrote:Unfortunately, Max still won't buy the mods elite ninja assassin squads to use, so... no such luck.
Sandaoguo wrote:GP is a den of cynics and nihilists
My opinions do not represent any NS governments I may happen to be in (yeah right), any RL governments I may happen to be in (yeah right), the CIA, the NSA, the FBI. the Freemasons, the Illuminati, Opus Dei, the Knights Templar, the Organization for the Advancement of Cultural Marxism, Opus Dei, or any other organization. Unless I say they do, in which case, there is a nonzero chance.

User avatar
New Waldensia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 432
Founded: Feb 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby New Waldensia » Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:18 pm

Freedom to Seek Medical Care
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild

[Preamble, unchanged]
Believing that individuals possess an inalienable right to seek medical care of their own accord and at their own expense, above and beyond that which may be provided for them by their government or by their nation's laws,‎

Understanding that medical treatment is a complex issue and requires great care, and that health-care needs can be difficult to adequately treat without the proper resources, technology, training and expertise,

Aware that some nations do not have said resources and training available in their medical facilities, and that some diseases, conditions, and disorders occur in such limited instances that some nations have little or no experience treating them,

Concerned that some nations may be harming their citizens by mandating that they be medically treated within their own borders or by restricting access to new or experimental treatments, thus denying better treatment that may be obtained elsewhere,

Observing that there may be occasions where treatment in another nation may be preferable to a patient,


The General Assembly hereby:

1: Prohibits member nations from denying or restricting their citizens or permanent residents from leaving to obtain medically necessary healthcare in other nations at their own expense, so long as the individuals are not currently detained for medical or legal reasons, in addition to any restrictions imposed by legislation passed by the General Assembly, subject to any restrictions previously imposed by the General Assembly,

2: Affirms the ability of member nations to set their own policies and restrictions regarding the acceptance or non-acceptance of non-resident patients, including complete refusal to accept non-resident patients, and further declares that no member nation is required by this measure to provide medical care to non-resident medical patients above any requirements previously imposed by legislation passed by the General Assembly,

3: Requires that member nations respect the rights of all patients and their legal representatives,

4: Prohibits member nations from taking legal action against citizens or permanent residents as relating to them seeking medical treatments or operations abroad, as long as General Assembly resolutions have not been violated,

5: Declares that patients seeking to travel to a foreign nation for the purpose of obtaining medical care or treatment are financially responsible for transport or medical treatment sought abroad, and that such arrangements must be made by and financed by the person(s) seeking treatment, or by their legal guardians or representation,‎

6: States that member nations are not obligated to cover future medical costs for conditions that arise after and directly result from medical treatments or operations sought at private expense by the patient under this measure,

7: Notes that member nations are not prohibited from assisting in defraying the financial cost associated with citizens or permanent residents seeking medical care under this measure.


Work in progress. Trying to figure out how to satisfactorily re-word #5.
IC WA Diplomat Josiah Garrett
Author of GA #414 (Freedom to Seek Medical Care) and GA #456 (Freedom to Seek Medical Care II)

Army of Freedom medals received:
N-Day² Medals -- N-Day³ Medals -- N-Day⁴ Medals
Z-Day6 Medals

User avatar
New Waldensia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 432
Founded: Feb 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby New Waldensia » Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:12 pm

Freedom to Seek Medical Care
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild

[Preamble, unchanged]
Believing that individuals possess an inalienable right to seek medical care of their own accord and at their own expense, above and beyond that which may be provided for them by their government or by their nation's laws,‎

Understanding that medical treatment is a complex issue and requires great care, and that health-care needs can be difficult to adequately treat without the proper resources, technology, training and expertise,

Aware that some nations do not have said resources and training available in their medical facilities, and that some diseases, conditions, and disorders occur in such limited instances that some nations have little or no experience treating them,

Concerned that some nations may be harming their citizens by mandating that they be medically treated within their own borders or by restricting access to new or experimental treatments, thus denying better treatment that may be obtained elsewhere,

Observing that there may be occasions where treatment in another nation may be preferable to a patient,


The General Assembly hereby:

1: Prohibits member nations from denying or restricting their citizens or permanent residents from leaving to obtain medically necessary healthcare in other nations at their own expense, subject to any restrictions previously imposed by the General Assembly,

2: Affirms the ability of member nations to set their own policies and restrictions regarding the acceptance or non-acceptance of non-resident patients, and further declares that no member nation is required by this measure to provide medical care to non-resident medical patients above any requirements previously imposed by the General Assembly,

3: Requires that member nations respect the rights of all patients and their legal representatives,

4: Prohibits member nations from taking legal action against citizens or permanent residents as relating to them seeking medical treatments or operations abroad, as long as General Assembly resolutions have not been violated,

5: Declares that patients seeking to travel to a foreign nation for the purpose of obtaining medical care or treatment under this act are financially responsible for any costs transport or medical treatment sought abroad not compensated by existing laws in their home nation, and that such arrangements travel and payment must be made arranged by and financed by the person(s) seeking treatment, or by their legal guardians or representation,‎

6: States that member nations are not obligated to cover future medical costs for conditions that arise after and directly result from medical treatments or operations sought at private expense by the patient under this measure,

7: Notes that member nations are not prohibited from assisting in defraying the financial cost associated with citizens or permanent residents seeking medical care under this measure.


OOC: Been busy with RL... final call for comments before submission.
IC WA Diplomat Josiah Garrett
Author of GA #414 (Freedom to Seek Medical Care) and GA #456 (Freedom to Seek Medical Care II)

Army of Freedom medals received:
N-Day² Medals -- N-Day³ Medals -- N-Day⁴ Medals
Z-Day6 Medals

User avatar
Fauxia
Senator
 
Posts: 4827
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Fauxia » Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:02 am

I’d submit whenever there’s an empty queue. Pounce on it. You may gain extra votes for not being a marriage resolution
Reploid Productions wrote:Unfortunately, Max still won't buy the mods elite ninja assassin squads to use, so... no such luck.
Sandaoguo wrote:GP is a den of cynics and nihilists
My opinions do not represent any NS governments I may happen to be in (yeah right), any RL governments I may happen to be in (yeah right), the CIA, the NSA, the FBI. the Freemasons, the Illuminati, Opus Dei, the Knights Templar, the Organization for the Advancement of Cultural Marxism, Opus Dei, or any other organization. Unless I say they do, in which case, there is a nonzero chance.

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Thu Nov 02, 2017 6:45 am

New Waldensia wrote:6: States that member nations are not obligated to cover future medical costs for conditions that arise after and directly result from medical treatments or operations sought at private expense by the patient under this measure,

OOC: This currently reads like also applying for if the nation's own private healthcare has buggered something up, rather than just treatments gotten in other nations.
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
New Waldensia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 432
Founded: Feb 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby New Waldensia » Thu Nov 02, 2017 7:34 am

Araraukar wrote:
New Waldensia wrote:6: States that member nations are not obligated to cover future medical costs for conditions that arise after and directly result from medical treatments or operations sought at private expense by the patient under this measure,

OOC: This currently reads like also applying for if the nation's own private healthcare has buggered something up, rather than just treatments gotten in other nations.

I thought that "under this measure" would narrow it down enough. Would you find this agreeable?

"6: States that member nations are not obligated to cover future medical costs for conditions that arise after and directly result from medical treatments or operations sought at private expense in foreign countries by the patient under this measure,"
IC WA Diplomat Josiah Garrett
Author of GA #414 (Freedom to Seek Medical Care) and GA #456 (Freedom to Seek Medical Care II)

Army of Freedom medals received:
N-Day² Medals -- N-Day³ Medals -- N-Day⁴ Medals
Z-Day6 Medals

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:29 am

New Waldensia wrote:"6: States that member nations are not obligated to cover future medical costs for conditions that arise after and directly result from medical treatments or operations sought at private expense in foreign countries by the patient under this measure,"

OOC: That'd work. It was the only thing that stuck out, otherwise looked good. (Just watch my sleep-deprived brain having missed something vital now...)
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
New Waldensia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 432
Founded: Feb 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby New Waldensia » Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:43 pm

SUBMITTED

Freedom to Seek Medical Care
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild

Believing that individuals possess an inalienable right to seek medical care of their own accord and at their own expense, above and beyond that which may be provided for them by their government or by their nation's laws,‎

Understanding that medical treatment is a complex issue and requires great care, and that health-care needs can be difficult to adequately treat without the proper resources, technology, training and expertise,

Aware that some nations do not have said resources and training available in their medical facilities, and that some diseases, conditions, and disorders occur in such limited instances that some nations have little or no experience treating them,

Concerned that some nations may be harming their citizens by mandating that they be medically treated within their own borders or by restricting access to new or experimental treatments, thus denying better treatment that may be obtained elsewhere,

Observing that there may be occasions where treatment in another nation may be preferable to a patient,

The General Assembly hereby:

1: Prohibits member nations from denying or restricting their citizens or permanent residents from leaving to obtain medically necessary healthcare in other nations at their own expense, subject to any restrictions previously imposed by the General Assembly,

2: Affirms the ability of member nations to set their own policies and restrictions regarding the acceptance or non-acceptance of non-resident patients, and further declares that no member nation is required by this measure to provide medical care to non-resident medical patients above any requirements previously imposed by the General Assembly,

3: Requires that member nations respect the rights of all patients and their legal representatives,

4: Prohibits member nations from taking legal action against citizens or permanent residents as relating to them seeking medical treatments or operations abroad, as long as General Assembly resolutions have not been violated,

5: Declares that patients seeking medical care or treatment under this act are financially responsible for any costs not compensated by existing laws in their home nation, and that such travel and payment must be arranged by the person(s) seeking treatment, or by their legal guardians or representation,‎

6: States that member nations are not obligated to cover future medical costs for conditions that arise after and directly result from medical treatments or operations sought at private expense by the patient under this measure,

7: Notes that member nations are not prohibited from assisting in defraying the financial cost associated with citizens or permanent residents seeking medical care under this measure.
IC WA Diplomat Josiah Garrett
Author of GA #414 (Freedom to Seek Medical Care) and GA #456 (Freedom to Seek Medical Care II)

Army of Freedom medals received:
N-Day² Medals -- N-Day³ Medals -- N-Day⁴ Medals
Z-Day6 Medals

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12659
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:12 pm

(shaking head.) I don't know why people are so obsessed with bolding.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Deropia
Envoy
 
Posts: 245
Founded: Apr 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Deropia » Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:42 pm

OOC: So, on the proposals page clause 5 ends with '&#8206' I'm sure that wasn't intentional and wanted to point that out before the campaign got too far underway. Though, that could just be my browser being all weird.
Last edited by Deropia on Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lieutenant-Commander Jason MacAlister
Deropian Ambassador to the World Assembly
macalister.j@diplomats.com
Office 1302, 13th Floor, World Assembly Headquarters
Minister of WA Affairs [TNP]
Captain, North Pacific Army Special Forces
Former Speaker of the Regional Assembly [TNP]

User avatar
Dragonslinding WA Mission
Envoy
 
Posts: 330
Founded: May 28, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Dragonslinding WA Mission » Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:57 am

Maester Tarquin: The Mission is willing to support this measure. I'll begin preparing new legislation to deport voluntarily remove all extremely contagious persons to the nearest member nation willing to take them.
Ser Aegon Snow: Chief Ambassador of HM Government to the WA.
Ser Dawrin Stone: Assistant Ambassador of HM Government to the WA

Please note that Ser is a title not a name. It denotes that both of these gentlemen have been knighted


We creatively comply with a number of WA resolutions, check out our factbook on the matter if you'd like to know more.

Cisgendered, homosexual white male. Classically liberal/libertarian, this nation does not reflect my actual political positions.

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:29 am

Dragonslinding WA Mission wrote:Maester Tarquin: The Mission is willing to support this measure. I'll begin preparing new legislation to deport voluntarily remove all extremely contagious persons to the nearest member nation willing to take them.

"Too bad you're required to quarantine them in your nation, by an existing resolution," Johan pointed out. "And also that no other nation is required to, and are in fact actively discouraged to let them in."
Last edited by Araraukar on Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
The Bible Baptist Republic
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 120
Founded: May 28, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The Bible Baptist Republic » Wed Nov 08, 2017 10:47 am

Dragonslinding WA Mission wrote:Maester Tarquin: The Mission is willing to support this measure. I'll begin preparing new legislation to deport voluntarily remove all extremely contagious persons to the nearest member nation willing to take them.


I’m pretty sure you will not see an influx of medical tourists seeking out the latest in potions, bloodletting, and leech applications.
Last edited by The Bible Baptist Republic on Wed Nov 08, 2017 10:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
-- Ambassador Robert Make-Me-An-Instrument-Of-Your-Worship Conklin, Bible Baptist Republic

User avatar
Dragonslinding WA Mission
Envoy
 
Posts: 330
Founded: May 28, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Dragonslinding WA Mission » Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:46 am

Araraukar wrote:
Dragonslinding WA Mission wrote:Maester Tarquin: The Mission is willing to support this measure. I'll begin preparing new legislation to deport voluntarily remove all extremely contagious persons to the nearest member nation willing to take them.

"Too bad you're required to quarantine them in your nation, by an existing resolution," Johan pointed out. "And also that no other nation is required to, and are in fact actively discouraged to let them in."


Maester Tarquin: "We can deport them internally then. There are vast tracts of uninhabited frozen waste land in the far north. We already have 'settlement programs' that we can modify."

The Bible Baptist Republic wrote:I’m pretty sure you will not see an influx of medical tourists seeking out the latest in potions, bloodletting, and leech applications.


Maester Tarquin: "More the pity. Dragonslund has the most advanced potions, bloodletting and leech applications. I'm also told that in the South there have been experiments to drive out evil spirits that cause many forms of lunacy. After all it takes three or more Maesters of Healing to attract carrion birds, which is a 25% reduction from 10 years ago."
Ser Aegon Snow: Chief Ambassador of HM Government to the WA.
Ser Dawrin Stone: Assistant Ambassador of HM Government to the WA

Please note that Ser is a title not a name. It denotes that both of these gentlemen have been knighted


We creatively comply with a number of WA resolutions, check out our factbook on the matter if you'd like to know more.

Cisgendered, homosexual white male. Classically liberal/libertarian, this nation does not reflect my actual political positions.

User avatar
Clean Land
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 190
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Clean Land » Thu Nov 09, 2017 7:13 am

1: Prohibits member nations from denying or restricting their citizens or permanent residents from leaving to obtain medically necessary healthcare in other nations at their own expense, subject to any restrictions previously imposed by the General Assembly,


Convicted criminals.
No exceptions for times of war.
Against.

User avatar
Deropia
Envoy
 
Posts: 245
Founded: Apr 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Deropia » Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:31 pm

Clean Land wrote:Convicted criminals.

"Don't issue your convicted criminals passports, then."
Clean Land wrote:No exceptions for times of war.

"Would any reasonable person go to an enemy state for medical care?"
Clean Land wrote:Against.

"For, so I guess that cancels that out."
Lieutenant-Commander Jason MacAlister
Deropian Ambassador to the World Assembly
macalister.j@diplomats.com
Office 1302, 13th Floor, World Assembly Headquarters
Minister of WA Affairs [TNP]
Captain, North Pacific Army Special Forces
Former Speaker of the Regional Assembly [TNP]

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:32 pm

Deropia wrote:
Clean Land wrote:Convicted criminals.

"Don't issue your convicted criminals passports, then."
Clean Land wrote:No exceptions for times of war.

"Would any reasonable person go to an enemy state for medical care?"
Clean Land wrote:Against.

"For, so I guess that cancels that out."

"Eh, what the hell. For. That takes us past neutral."

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Clean Land
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 190
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Clean Land » Thu Nov 09, 2017 1:18 pm

Deropia wrote:
Clean Land wrote:Convicted criminals.

"Don't issue your convicted criminals passports, then."
World Assembly Resolution 76, Standardised Passport Act
Clean Land wrote:No exceptions for times of war.

"Would any reasonable person go to an enemy state for medical care?"
If they want to switch sides, probably yes...
Clean Land wrote:Against.

"For, so I guess that cancels that out."

That's merely our conclusion... and of course our current vote.
If it comes to a vote, maybe it does maybe not.

User avatar
Deropia
Envoy
 
Posts: 245
Founded: Apr 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Deropia » Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:07 pm

Clean Land wrote:
Deropia wrote:"Don't issue your convicted criminals passports, then."
World Assembly Resolution 76, Standardised Passport Act

"Would any reasonable person go to an enemy state for medical care?"
If they want to switch sides, probably yes...

"For, so I guess that cancels that out."

That's merely our conclusion... and of course our current vote.
If it comes to a vote, maybe it does maybe not.


"GAR# 76 actually just requires that foreign nationals travelling have a valid passport, not that nations have to issue them to all citizens. However, point taken about desertion and defection. This issue was addressed in an earlier draft, I believe, however the relevant sections have been removed. I've considered your argument and agree. As much as I support the principals behind this proposal, I may have to reconsider. I'll review the proposed copy and consider voting against."
Lieutenant-Commander Jason MacAlister
Deropian Ambassador to the World Assembly
macalister.j@diplomats.com
Office 1302, 13th Floor, World Assembly Headquarters
Minister of WA Affairs [TNP]
Captain, North Pacific Army Special Forces
Former Speaker of the Regional Assembly [TNP]

User avatar
States of Glory WA Office
Minister
 
Posts: 2105
Founded: Jul 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby States of Glory WA Office » Thu Nov 09, 2017 3:10 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:(shaking head.) I don't know why people are so obsessed with bolding.

I agree. Let people bold all they want, I say! #BeBold
Ambassador: Neville Lynn Robert
Assistant: Harold "The Clown" Johnson
#MakeLegislationFunnyAgain

User avatar
Aegyptumia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Oct 19, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aegyptumia » Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:35 pm

We would not allow citizens to go wherever they want just to get such things as "medical treatment".
The United Magreb Republic of Aegyptumia

Proud member of APEX, and former member of Europeia and CAIN

THIS NATION DO REPRESENT MY POLITICAL VIEWS.

Not my primary nation, used for Roleplay in TURA and World Assembly.

EGYPTIAN TIMES
-King Seti I announced invasion to the Space Nazis
-Egypt recently did an orbital bombardment to several planets

May God have mercy to my enemies, because I won't.
-George Patton

PIZZA IS LOVE.PASTA IS LIFE.GOTT UND VATERLAND!AEGYPTUMIA UBER ALLES!

User avatar
Atsvea
Secretary
 
Posts: 39
Founded: Aug 01, 2016
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Atsvea » Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:36 pm

,&#8206

Might want to get rid of that

User avatar
Nordhpadhan
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Aug 10, 2017
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Vote against

Postby Nordhpadhan » Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:38 pm

If your nation would not invest the taxes of your people to proper resources, technology, training and expertise, therefore it is a political choise that your citizens support. If your nation spends the taxes of your citizens in weapons and nothing in medical tratments, I do not see why my Nation have to offer to your richest citizens our medical tratments.
In my Nation medical treatments are at disposal for all my citizens and it is not a commercial business. Our Federal Council would not offer a medical tratment as it were a commercial business to be paid by the richest citizens of you nation.
If the citizens of your nation want a better health system, they have to change the mind of their government or have to elect someone else who invest their moneys in other ways.
It is not an affair of my Nation who your citizens will vote.
It is not responsible to vote yes. Our Federal Council invites your representatives to vote against.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads