States of Glory WA Office wrote:Barbera: Some of the active clauses end with full stops while others end with commas. We recommend ensuring that there is consistency.
Noted, and correction made.
Advertisement
by New Waldensia » Sat Oct 21, 2017 7:04 pm
States of Glory WA Office wrote:Barbera: Some of the active clauses end with full stops while others end with commas. We recommend ensuring that there is consistency.
Army of Freedom medals received:
• N-Day² Medals -- N-Day³ Medals -- N-Day⁴ Medals
• Z-Day6 Medals
by Bananaistan » Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:22 am
by Fauxia » Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:28 am
It does make sense, in the same way another person can donate to the patient. I agree that Waldensia should probably rephrase it though.Bananaistan wrote:OOC: So under section 5 the patients must make the arrangements themselves and must pay for it but section 7 says that member states may pay for it. This makes no sense! Why are you so intent on leaving repeal hooks in this?
by New Waldensia » Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:18 pm
Freedom to Seek Medical Care
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
[Preamble, unchanged]Believing that individuals possess an inalienable right to seek medical care of their own accord and at their own expense, above and beyond that which may be provided for them by their government or by their nation's laws,
Understanding that medical treatment is a complex issue and requires great care, and that health-care needs can be difficult to adequately treat without the proper resources, technology, training and expertise,
Aware that some nations do not have said resources and training available in their medical facilities, and that some diseases, conditions, and disorders occur in such limited instances that some nations have little or no experience treating them,
Concerned that some nations may be harming their citizens by mandating that they be medically treated within their own borders or by restricting access to new or experimental treatments, thus denying better treatment that may be obtained elsewhere,
Observing that there may be occasions where treatment in another nation may be preferable to a patient,
The General Assembly hereby:
1: Prohibits member nations from denying or restricting their citizens or permanent residents from leaving to obtain medically necessary healthcare in other nations at their own expense,so long as the individuals are not currently detained for medical or legal reasons, in addition to any restrictions imposed by legislation passed by the General Assembly,subject to any restrictions previously imposed by the General Assembly,
2: Affirms the ability of member nations to set their own policies and restrictions regarding the acceptance or non-acceptance of non-resident patients,including complete refusal to accept non-resident patients,and further declares that no member nation is required by this measure to provide medical care to non-resident medical patients above any requirements previously imposedby legislation passedby the General Assembly,
3: Requires that member nations respect the rights of all patients and their legal representatives,
4: Prohibits member nations from taking legal action against citizens or permanent residents as relating to them seeking medical treatments or operations abroad, as long as General Assembly resolutions have not been violated,
5: Declares that patients seeking to travel to a foreign nation for the purpose of obtaining medical care or treatment are financially responsible for transport or medical treatment sought abroad, and that such arrangements must be made by and financed by the person(s) seeking treatment, or by their legal guardians or representation,
6: States that member nations are not obligated to cover future medical costs for conditions that arise after and directly result from medical treatments or operations sought at private expense by the patient under this measure,
7: Notes that member nations are not prohibited from assisting in defraying the financial cost associated with citizens or permanent residents seeking medical care under this measure.
Army of Freedom medals received:
• N-Day² Medals -- N-Day³ Medals -- N-Day⁴ Medals
• Z-Day6 Medals
by New Waldensia » Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:12 pm
Freedom to Seek Medical Care
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
[Preamble, unchanged]Believing that individuals possess an inalienable right to seek medical care of their own accord and at their own expense, above and beyond that which may be provided for them by their government or by their nation's laws,
Understanding that medical treatment is a complex issue and requires great care, and that health-care needs can be difficult to adequately treat without the proper resources, technology, training and expertise,
Aware that some nations do not have said resources and training available in their medical facilities, and that some diseases, conditions, and disorders occur in such limited instances that some nations have little or no experience treating them,
Concerned that some nations may be harming their citizens by mandating that they be medically treated within their own borders or by restricting access to new or experimental treatments, thus denying better treatment that may be obtained elsewhere,
Observing that there may be occasions where treatment in another nation may be preferable to a patient,
The General Assembly hereby:
1: Prohibits member nations from denying or restricting their citizens or permanent residents from leaving to obtain medically necessary healthcare in other nations at their own expense, subject to any restrictions previously imposed by the General Assembly,
2: Affirms the ability of member nations to set their own policies and restrictions regarding the acceptance or non-acceptance of non-resident patients, and further declares that no member nation is required by this measure to provide medical care to non-resident medical patients above any requirements previously imposed by the General Assembly,
3: Requires that member nations respect the rights of all patients and their legal representatives,
4: Prohibits member nations from taking legal action against citizens or permanent residents as relating to them seeking medical treatments or operations abroad, as long as General Assembly resolutions have not been violated,
5: Declares that patients seekingto travel to a foreign nation for the purpose of obtainingmedical care or treatment under this act are financially responsible for any coststransport or medical treatment sought abroadnot compensated by existing laws in their home nation, and that sucharrangementstravel and payment must bemadearranged byand financed bythe person(s) seeking treatment, or by their legal guardians or representation,
6: States that member nations are not obligated to cover future medical costs for conditions that arise after and directly result from medical treatments or operations sought at private expense by the patient under this measure,
7: Notes that member nations are not prohibited from assisting in defraying the financial cost associated with citizens or permanent residents seeking medical care under this measure.
Army of Freedom medals received:
• N-Day² Medals -- N-Day³ Medals -- N-Day⁴ Medals
• Z-Day6 Medals
by Fauxia » Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:02 am
by Araraukar » Thu Nov 02, 2017 6:45 am
New Waldensia wrote:6: States that member nations are not obligated to cover future medical costs for conditions that arise after and directly result from medical treatments or operations sought at private expense by the patient under this measure,
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by New Waldensia » Thu Nov 02, 2017 7:34 am
Araraukar wrote:New Waldensia wrote:6: States that member nations are not obligated to cover future medical costs for conditions that arise after and directly result from medical treatments or operations sought at private expense by the patient under this measure,
OOC: This currently reads like also applying for if the nation's own private healthcare has buggered something up, rather than just treatments gotten in other nations.
Army of Freedom medals received:
• N-Day² Medals -- N-Day³ Medals -- N-Day⁴ Medals
• Z-Day6 Medals
by Araraukar » Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:29 am
New Waldensia wrote:"6: States that member nations are not obligated to cover future medical costs for conditions that arise after and directly result from medical treatments or operations sought at private expense in foreign countries by the patient under this measure,"
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by New Waldensia » Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:43 pm
Army of Freedom medals received:
• N-Day² Medals -- N-Day³ Medals -- N-Day⁴ Medals
• Z-Day6 Medals
by Imperium Anglorum » Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:12 pm
by Deropia » Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:42 pm
Lieutenant-Commander Jason MacAlister Deropian Ambassador to the World Assembly macalister.j@diplomats.com Office 1302, 13th Floor, World Assembly Headquarters | Minister of WA Affairs [TNP] Captain, North Pacific Army Special Forces Former Speaker of the Regional Assembly [TNP] |
by Dragonslinding WA Mission » Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:57 am
by Araraukar » Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:29 am
Dragonslinding WA Mission wrote:Maester Tarquin: The Mission is willing to support this measure. I'll begin preparing new legislation todeportvoluntarily remove all extremely contagious persons to the nearest member nation willing to take them.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by The Bible Baptist Republic » Wed Nov 08, 2017 10:47 am
Dragonslinding WA Mission wrote:Maester Tarquin: The Mission is willing to support this measure. I'll begin preparing new legislation todeportvoluntarily remove all extremely contagious persons to the nearest member nation willing to take them.
by Dragonslinding WA Mission » Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:46 am
Araraukar wrote:Dragonslinding WA Mission wrote:Maester Tarquin: The Mission is willing to support this measure. I'll begin preparing new legislation todeportvoluntarily remove all extremely contagious persons to the nearest member nation willing to take them.
"Too bad you're required to quarantine them in your nation, by an existing resolution," Johan pointed out. "And also that no other nation is required to, and are in fact actively discouraged to let them in."
The Bible Baptist Republic wrote:I’m pretty sure you will not see an influx of medical tourists seeking out the latest in potions, bloodletting, and leech applications.
by Clean Land » Thu Nov 09, 2017 7:13 am
1: Prohibits member nations from denying or restricting their citizens or permanent residents from leaving to obtain medically necessary healthcare in other nations at their own expense, subject to any restrictions previously imposed by the General Assembly,
by Deropia » Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:31 pm
Clean Land wrote:Convicted criminals.
Clean Land wrote:No exceptions for times of war.
Clean Land wrote:Against.
Lieutenant-Commander Jason MacAlister Deropian Ambassador to the World Assembly macalister.j@diplomats.com Office 1302, 13th Floor, World Assembly Headquarters | Minister of WA Affairs [TNP] Captain, North Pacific Army Special Forces Former Speaker of the Regional Assembly [TNP] |
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:32 pm
by Clean Land » Thu Nov 09, 2017 1:18 pm
Deropia wrote:Clean Land wrote:Convicted criminals.
"Don't issue your convicted criminals passports, then."
World Assembly Resolution 76, Standardised Passport ActClean Land wrote:No exceptions for times of war.
"Would any reasonable person go to an enemy state for medical care?"
If they want to switch sides, probably yes...Clean Land wrote:Against.
"For, so I guess that cancels that out."
by Deropia » Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:07 pm
Clean Land wrote:Deropia wrote:"Don't issue your convicted criminals passports, then."
World Assembly Resolution 76, Standardised Passport Act
"Would any reasonable person go to an enemy state for medical care?"
If they want to switch sides, probably yes...
"For, so I guess that cancels that out."
That's merely our conclusion... and of course our current vote.
If it comes to a vote, maybe it does maybe not.
Lieutenant-Commander Jason MacAlister Deropian Ambassador to the World Assembly macalister.j@diplomats.com Office 1302, 13th Floor, World Assembly Headquarters | Minister of WA Affairs [TNP] Captain, North Pacific Army Special Forces Former Speaker of the Regional Assembly [TNP] |
by States of Glory WA Office » Thu Nov 09, 2017 3:10 pm
Imperium Anglorum wrote:(shaking head.) I don't know why people are so obsessed with bolding.
by Aegyptumia » Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:35 pm
May God have mercy to my enemies, because I won't.
-George Patton
by Nordhpadhan » Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:38 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement