Sciongrad wrote:The only argument against duplication is that CoCR protects civil rights, not political rights, but precedent suggests that isn't the case.
To be fair, that's not my argument. My argument is that duplication of CoCR is allowed when it is used to make anti-discriminatory policy more clear in a narrow area.
Examples:
GA #57, Refugee Protection, clause 3. GA #104, Institutional Psychiatry Act, clause 5. GA #159, Promotion of Intl Education, clause III 2. GA #297, Child Welfare in Adoption, the Forbids clause. GA #299, Legal Competence, 2 iii. GA #310, Disabled Voters Act, clause 1. (Which, btw, is the only resolution I could find that protected someone's right to vote.) GA #354, AI Coexistence Protocol, clause 2. GA #355, Rights of Sapient Species, pretty much the whole resolution, but especially the Hereby Declares clause.
And I didn't even bother to include all the ones that duplicate CoCR's 1 a and b.