NATION

PASSWORD

Rules and Procedures of the GA Secretariat

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.

Remove ads

User avatar
Araraukar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11445
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:01 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:If that is the case, there are various different discussion threads which should have been released. I'm unclear on exactly which ones they are, but I am confident that there are more than three or so (unfortunately, I haven't made an exhaustive search of the relevant data when the ruling are issued).

If you mean all legality challenges, there are something like closer to a dozen, but it seems they're only releasing ones that have gotten an actual ruling. (I'd be happily wrong with this, but I don't think I am.)
"I've come to appreciate boring bureaucracy much more after my official execution..." - Johan Milkus, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

User avatar
Christian Democrats
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 9764
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:08 pm

IA, in the GenSec forum, GR started a "Rulings Repository" similar to yours on the UNOG board.

viewtopic.php?f=39&t=394297

Unfortunately, he hasn't stuck with it.

I'm sorry for the wait on the private discussions. The GA mods are supposed to move them after one month, but all of the GA mods have basically disappeared. I've made a request for non-GA mods to move Patent Recognition Treaty and Open Internet Order to the public archive. Formal opinions were never written on Open Internet Order, and I doubt that they'll be written almost three months after the fact. And Open Internet Order has been repealed, so the issuance of a formal opinion could be considered a moot point.

I basically disappeared in late March and April. My post on Open Internet Order, however, summarizes what the opinions were going to say:

viewtopic.php?p=31341584#p31341584

(the link won't work until the thread has been moved)

EDIT: You might want to read SL's subsequent post too. On second glance, mine is somewhat incoherent. :unsure:
Last edited by Christian Democrats on Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7546
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:35 pm

Extrajudicial Punishment Ban should also be moved. I'm also confident that there were/are one or two that have been ruled upon that are also more than a month old. As you all have the actual discussion threads, I'm also confident that you have a better idea of what GenSec has been ruling and discussing.

Delegate for Europe
Out-of-character unless marked otherwise
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate

User avatar
Wallenburg
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17981
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
New York Times Democracy

Postby Wallenburg » Tue Jun 13, 2017 6:19 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:IA, in the GenSec forum, GR started a "Rulings Repository" similar to yours on the UNOG board.

viewtopic.php?f=39&t=394297

Unfortunately, he hasn't stuck with it.

We can't see that, just so you know.
PROFESSIONAL CRITIC OF ALL THINGS GENSEC
There never has been, nor will there ever be, such thing as a wallenburger.
PRO: GOOD || ANTI: BAD

User avatar
Luna Amore
Issues Editor
 
Posts: 10811
Founded: Antiquity
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Luna Amore » Tue Jun 13, 2017 7:39 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:I'm sorry for the wait on the private discussions. The GA mods are supposed to move them after one month, but all of the GA mods have basically disappeared. I've made a request for non-GA mods to move Patent Recognition Treaty and Open Internet Order to the public archive. Formal opinions were never written on Open Internet Order, and I doubt that they'll be written almost three months after the fact. And Open Internet Order has been repealed, so the issuance of a formal opinion could be considered a moot point.

Like you just did, I'd recommend posting a request in your forum when you see something needs to be moved. If there's a request, I (and I assume any mod that sees it) will move it.

I don't imagine any mods are going to scan GenSec for month old threads to move without prodding.
Last edited by Luna Amore on Tue Jun 13, 2017 7:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Max: The code changelog says, "Added 'butthole' by mod request"
Lenyo: This dilemma needs an option that Luna would support in RL.

User avatar
Ledaj
Secretary
 
Posts: 38
Founded: Jun 12, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Ledaj » Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:21 pm

Sciongrad wrote:1c. GenSec will deliberate, asking players further questions if necessary. Upon reaching a majority opinion, GenSec will post their ruling and notify the mods if the proposal needs to be removed from queue. Rulings will include a majority opinion and any dissenting opinions. Precedent-setting rulings will be recorded in a public compendium.
d. The controlling opinion shall be released immediately after a majority of those voting agree to it; concurring or dissenting opinions may be released and added to the official record as they are completed.

Is the above 'public compendium' the "Secretariat Archives"?
I had assumed not, considering that in the text of a draft 'National Control of Elections' ruling, Christian Democrats asked "Is this appropriate for final publication and for placement in whatever Rulings Archive we create?"
viewtopic.php?p=30341749#p30341749
(yes I keep talking about 'National Control because that's the only one I've read through the whole thing of yet - if you (one of the Secretariat) would rather I read them all before asking annoying questions, I consider that valid, please let me know)
If it is not, (it's not or it isn't??) then where is said 'public compendium'?
If it is, why is there a non precedential ruling in it?
My question comes down to this:
Where are all the precedential decisions posted as specified by the 'Rules and Procedures of the General Assembly Secretariat' 1c. ?
Edit: Fixed an unclear clause and a capitalization error.
Also: 'precedential' I saw Christian Democrats used this so I'm using it too, apologies if it's not a real word
Last edited by Ledaj on Thu Jun 15, 2017 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Theocracy of Ledaj
Long Live the Roc Supreme
Achievements: For now this is just for symmetry!
GA:Ronald Helmsworth

User avatar
Christian Democrats
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 9764
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:38 pm

Ledaj wrote:Where are all the precedential decisions posted as specified by the 'Rules and Procedures of the General Assembly Secretariat' 1c. ?

Glen-Rhodes started a thread in the GenSec forum, and it was going to be moved to this forum . . .
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
Ledaj
Secretary
 
Posts: 38
Founded: Jun 12, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Ledaj » Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:12 am

Christian Democrats wrote:
Ledaj wrote:Where are all the precedential decisions posted as specified by the 'Rules and Procedures of the General Assembly Secretariat' 1c. ?

Glen-Rhodes started a thread in the GenSec forum, and it was going to be moved to this forum . . .

If possible, could you, in this case, do as Luna Amore suggested for a slightly different case?
Luna Amore wrote:Like you just did, I'd recommend posting a request in your forum when you see something needs to be moved. If there's a request, I (and I assume any mod that sees it) will move it.

I don't imagine any mods are going to scan GenSec for month old threads to move without prodding.
The Theocracy of Ledaj
Long Live the Roc Supreme
Achievements: For now this is just for symmetry!
GA:Ronald Helmsworth

User avatar
Christian Democrats
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 9764
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Fri Jun 16, 2017 12:37 pm

Ledaj wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:Glen-Rhodes started a thread in the GenSec forum, and it was going to be moved to this forum . . .

If possible, could you, in this case, do as Luna Amore suggested for a slightly different case?
Luna Amore wrote:Like you just did, I'd recommend posting a request in your forum when you see something needs to be moved. If there's a request, I (and I assume any mod that sees it) will move it.

I don't imagine any mods are going to scan GenSec for month old threads to move without prodding.

viewtopic.php?p=31931667#p31931667

As I said above, GR didn't stick with it. :(
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7546
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:33 pm

Also, Scion, you're missing a starting bold tag on section 6.

Extraducial Punishment Ban's discussion thread needs to be released, as it was decided on 03/03/2017.
Repeal "Pesticide Regulations" 's discussion thread needs to be released as well, as it was decided 07/05/2017.
Last edited by Imperium Anglorum on Wed Jun 21, 2017 5:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Delegate for Europe
Out-of-character unless marked otherwise
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7546
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Fri Jun 23, 2017 10:47 pm

Working on the GA database, I'd like to catalogue dissents, but it appears that some have never been published. For example, BA's dissent on Compliance Commission was never published, nor was his dissent on Repeal "Rights of the Quarantined", though that certainly is new.

Also, the Secretariat threads for the decisions mentioned in the last post should be moved to the public forum.

Delegate for Europe
Out-of-character unless marked otherwise
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate

User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16481
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:08 am

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Working on the GA database, I'd like to catalogue dissents, but it appears that some have never been published. For example, BA's dissent on Compliance Commission was never published, nor was his dissent on Repeal "Rights of the Quarantined", though that certainly is new.

The judgement on 'Compliance Commission' came at a time when unfortunately I was rather busy in RL, and writing my formal opinion got put on hold & then forgotten. I'll try to get back to it soon after next week, when I'll have more time available.
My dissenting opinion on 'Repeal "Rights of the Quarantined" ' is being worked on.
Last edited by Bears Armed on Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Confederated Clans of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934.

User avatar
Sciongrad
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 2843
Founded: Mar 11, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Sciongrad » Thu Jun 29, 2017 7:31 am

Section 7 has been added. Additionally, I've added a comprehensive list of GenSec decisions created by none other than IA. I hope everyone finds this to be a valuable resource.
Last edited by Sciongrad on Thu Jun 29, 2017 7:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Natalia Santos, Plenipotentiary and Permanent Scionite Representative to the World Assembly


Ideological Bulwark #271


User avatar
Thyerata
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 359
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Thyerata » Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:02 am

Sciongrad wrote:Section 7 has been added. Additionally, I've added a comprehensive list of GenSec decisions created by none other than IA. I hope everyone finds this to be a valuable resource.


Thanks Scion. While section 7 doesn't contain a definitive list of criteria, I would say that the requirement for members of GenSec to state publicly why they won't hear a case is still a good compromise in favour of GenSec's transparency.
From the Desk of the Honourable Matthew Merriweather Ph.D. (Law, 2040) LLM Public and International Law, 2036) LLB Law (2035) (all from Thyerata State University)
Thytian Ambassador to the World Assembly and Security Council

I'm a gay LLM candidate with mild Asperger syndrome and only one functioning eye. My IC posts may reflect this, so please be aware

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12497
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Separatist Peoples » Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:48 am

Thyerata wrote:
Sciongrad wrote:Section 7 has been added. Additionally, I've added a comprehensive list of GenSec decisions created by none other than IA. I hope everyone finds this to be a valuable resource.


Thanks Scion. While section 7 doesn't contain a definitive list of criteria, I would say that the requirement for members of GenSec to state publicly why they won't hear a case is still a good compromise in favour of GenSec's transparency.

It's exactly what we've been doing, just codified. Glad that's satisfactory.

Purveyor of contracts so one-sided, you'll be surprised there's text on the back of the page!

Second year law student, homebrewer, and cat worshiper

User avatar
Araraukar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11445
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Thu Jun 29, 2017 12:12 pm

Separatist Peoples wrote:It's exactly what we've been doing, just codified. Glad that's satisfactory.

So now we'll just have to figure out by trial and error what that unwritten list of criteria contains... :P
"I've come to appreciate boring bureaucracy much more after my official execution..." - Johan Milkus, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12497
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Separatist Peoples » Thu Jun 29, 2017 1:37 pm

Araraukar wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:It's exactly what we've been doing, just codified. Glad that's satisfactory.

So now we'll just have to figure out by trial and error what that unwritten list of criteria contains... :P

When something isn't immediately obvious as illegal. Obvious illegalities are why we have gameside tools. Rulings are for ambiguities. And before people start clamoring about what exactly is ambiguous, let me clear that up, too: letting the discussion unfold in the drafting thread is a really good barometer. If everybody is calling something illegal and the author is ignoring that advice, don't challenge it. If genuine discussion has gone on without a consensus or a corresponding edit, consider having a challenge. Just like when the Mods were doing it, we want challenges to be last resorts, used only after the community can't sort it out.

I genuinely don't see how this is suddenly hard (for people in general, not you specifically). Players didn't demand Mod Rulings on every single draft before GenSec because they knew when the legality was questionable and when it was obvious.
Last edited by Separatist Peoples on Thu Jun 29, 2017 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Purveyor of contracts so one-sided, you'll be surprised there's text on the back of the page!

Second year law student, homebrewer, and cat worshiper

User avatar
Frisbeeteria
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 21700
Founded: Dec 16, 2003
Anarchy

Postby Frisbeeteria » Thu Jun 29, 2017 3:59 pm

Separatist Peoples wrote:Players didn't demand Mod Rulings on every single draft before GenSec because they knew when the legality was questionable and when it was obvious.

They kinda did. We had to post this sort of thing all too often.

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12497
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Separatist Peoples » Thu Jun 29, 2017 4:31 pm

Frisbeeteria wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:Players didn't demand Mod Rulings on every single draft before GenSec because they knew when the legality was questionable and when it was obvious.

They kinda did. We had to post this sort of thing all too often.

Don't you ruin my happy memories! :p

Purveyor of contracts so one-sided, you'll be surprised there's text on the back of the page!

Second year law student, homebrewer, and cat worshiper

User avatar
Araraukar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11445
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Thu Jun 29, 2017 5:50 pm

Separatist Peoples wrote:
Frisbeeteria wrote:They kinda did. We had to post this sort of thing all too often.

Don't you ruin my happy memories! :p

Fris is right, though, people aren't picking on GenSec any more than they/we were during the mod era... Well, maybe a tiny bit more, because the system with you guys in power is still quite new, and we haven't yet found out all the things that make it wobble.
Last edited by Araraukar on Thu Jun 29, 2017 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I've come to appreciate boring bureaucracy much more after my official execution..." - Johan Milkus, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

User avatar
Wallenburg
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17981
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
New York Times Democracy

Postby Wallenburg » Thu Jun 29, 2017 11:30 pm

Araraukar wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:Don't you ruin my happy memories! :p

Fris is right, though, people aren't picking on GenSec any more than they/we were during the mod era... Well, maybe a tiny bit more, because the system with you guys in power is still quite new, and we haven't yet found out all the things that make it wobble.

Also, the whole reason we have GenSec is that it is supposed to be an improvement on the old system, so criticism over shortcomings greater than those of the old Secretariat can be expected.
PROFESSIONAL CRITIC OF ALL THINGS GENSEC
There never has been, nor will there ever be, such thing as a wallenburger.
PRO: GOOD || ANTI: BAD

User avatar
Bears Armed
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16481
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:24 am

Repeals

Decision confirmed by vote in the Secretariat, currently at 4-0 in favour: The 'Description' line that the game automatically adds for any Repeal proposal constitutes enough of an operative clause that the author's doesn't have to include one in their 'Argument' as well for legality.
The Confederated Clans of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Our population is approximately 20 million. We do have a national government, although its role is strictly limited. Economy = thriving. Those aren't "biker gangs", they're our traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies'... and are generally respected, not feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934.

User avatar
Bananaistan
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 1849
Founded: Apr 20, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Bananaistan » Sun Jul 02, 2017 8:36 am

Under what section of the procedures outlined in the OP was the discussion that lead to this decision held? What other elements of moderator precedent and/or GA custom and practice are you either currently discussing or intending to discuss changes to?
Last edited by Bananaistan on Sun Jul 02, 2017 8:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Delegation of the People's Republic of Bananaistan to the World Assembly
Head of delegation and the Permanent Representative: Comrade Ambassador Theodorus "Ted" Hornwood
General Assistant and Head of Security: Comrade Watchman Brian of Tarth
There was the Pope and John F. Kennedy and Jack Charlton and the three of them were staring me in the face.

User avatar
Araraukar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11445
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:07 am

Bananaistan wrote:Under what section of the procedures outlined in the OP was the discussion that lead to this decision held? What other elements of moderator precedent and/or GA custom and practice are you either currently discussing or intending to discuss changes to?

Also, if the decision of the rule change is made, it should be included in the official proposal rules thread, so everyone can find it easily, and at least at first people shouldn't be punished for redundancy for including the repeal clause as an active clause.
Last edited by Araraukar on Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I've come to appreciate boring bureaucracy much more after my official execution..." - Johan Milkus, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

User avatar
States of Glory WA Office
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1921
Founded: Jul 26, 2016
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby States of Glory WA Office » Sun Jul 02, 2017 4:17 pm

Araraukar wrote:
Bananaistan wrote:Under what section of the procedures outlined in the OP was the discussion that lead to this decision held? What other elements of moderator precedent and/or GA custom and practice are you either currently discussing or intending to discuss changes to?

Also, if the decision of the rule change is made, it should be included in the official proposal rules thread, so everyone can find it easily, and at least at first people shouldn't be punished for redundancy for including the repeal clause as an active clause.

People shouldn't be punished at all. Redundancy has never been illegal.
Ambassador: Bartholomew Harper Fairburn Rowan Flowerhaze Souldream Bartholomew Harper Fairburn
Assistant: Neville Lynn Robert
#MakeLegislationFunnyAgain

Other ambassadorial staff include but are not limited to Barbera Warner and Harold "The Clown" Johnson.

PreviousNext

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Remove ads