Urgench wrote:It's incredibly telling to me that responsible for the ruling on amendment and contradiction (coincidentally) quoted to me earlier in this discussion are two of the most unscrupulous, plainly deceitful, dissembling, strategicly calculating players who have ever played in the WA (in my extensive experience). Two players less suitable for the role and more liable to abuse it for entirely self-serving aims I could scarcely conceive of. And I mean that in the most OOC way possible. Their characters are in my opinion so disreputable as to make any of their rulings on legalities comically unreliable.
If this refers to a current member of the Secretariat, these are serious accusations which are best addressed via GHR.
I already said I'm done with this, are you trying to get me into more trouble? You can see for yourself that I wasn't talking about current Secretariat players. Leave me be.