Should we ban nuclear weapons?

by **Arlogan** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:13 pm

I say yes because of the sheer destruction of them.Think of the civilian deaths and soliders,politics etc.

by **Tinhampton** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:14 pm

I say no, because GAR#10 allows member states to hold nuclear weapons!

by **Shazakhra** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:18 pm

"That would violate GA #10, #289, #330, and #391 (as of now). I'd prefer if they were illegal but this is the precedent." :ugeek:

by **Democratic East-Asia** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:21 pm

We'll need them someday.

by **Deanson** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:25 pm

Arlogan wrote:I say yes because of the sheer destruction of them.Think of the civilian deaths and soliders,politics etc.

No. MAD ensures more peace and safety than people are willing to admit. Banning nukes will not remove them from existence, just make it so that the more questionable nations who don't adhere well to international law will be more happy and willing to use nuclear weapons.

by **Astariax** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:26 pm

Better than the alternative.

by **Frisbeeteria** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:07 pm

This isn't a generic discussion forum. Put your concerns into a GA proposal after Repealing relevant resolutions, and start a new thread.

Should we ban nuclear weapons?

Should we ban nuclear weapons?

Who is online