Advertisement
by The United Universe » Fri Jul 01, 2016 10:00 am
by Oakster » Fri Jul 01, 2016 9:38 pm
To: Wellington, Samuel (Foreign Secretary)
From: Lucien, Maxwell (WA Ambassador)
Attached: [Draft] WA Border Policy
Sir, I have attached a draft for an open border type policy being debated here at the WA. By a walrus no less. It could be good for Oakster and so I will keep you up to date with how it develops. Max.
To: Lucien, Maxwell (WA Ambassador)
From: Wellington, Samuel (Foreign Secretary)
Max, Thanks for the update. It sounds like it could be good economically, especially in light of the news I have to share with you. HRH has pulled us out of Austritaria due to attempts to undermine our Sovereignty and so we now find ourselves in the Region of Germope. I will update you further as things develop. Regards, Sam.
by The Wary Walrus » Sat Jul 02, 2016 10:06 am
by Araraukar » Sat Jul 02, 2016 10:09 am
The Wary Walrus wrote:The support is excellent to hear! Are there any changes to the text that anyone would like to see?
Separatist Peoples wrote:create a subcategory under GESTAPO and run duties through them. Then you don't need to use GESTAPO as an abbreviation, and you don't repeat the longhand version."
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by The Wary Walrus » Sat Jul 02, 2016 10:23 am
Araraukar wrote:The Wary Walrus wrote:The support is excellent to hear! Are there any changes to the text that anyone would like to see?
This:Separatist Peoples wrote:create a subcategory under GESTAPO and run duties through them. Then you don't need to use GESTAPO as an abbreviation, and you don't repeat the longhand version."
by Araraukar » Sat Jul 02, 2016 10:40 am
The Wary Walrus wrote:While I am tempted to do that I'd rather work with existing committees rather than complicate the international bureaucracy even more.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by The Wary Walrus » Sat Jul 02, 2016 12:34 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Sat Jul 02, 2016 12:38 pm
by Oakster » Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:23 pm
The support is excellent to hear! Are there any changes to the text that anyone would like to see?
by The Wary Walrus » Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:32 pm
Oakster wrote:The support is excellent to hear! Are there any changes to the text that anyone would like to see?
Maxwell raises his hand to signal his intention to speak.
"Will there be any clarification on the term 'unlimited travel across borders between consenting states without the need of the traveler to present documentation at each border'? Does this mean that even a consenting state is forbidden from putting in place a control of sorts, even if it is just a simple identity check? The defence implications of allowing an unlimited number of persons, entering and leaving a state, without any checks at all are immeasurable and of a magnitude that cant be quantified!"
Taking a breath before continuing, he steps forward away from the wall he was leaning on, and with a little more confidence he continues,
"If Nation A is non-consenting and sends a Citizen to Nation B who is consenting, Nation B will be allowed to check the identity of Citizen X upon entering as a matter of National Security. Citizen X is checked against Nation B's threat list and is cleared and authorised to continue. Citizen A then heads to the border of Nation C who is also a consenting Nation. Nation C is not allowed to check the identity of Citizen X as he is arriving from another consenting Nation, in this case Nation B. However, Nation C and Nation A are at war and Citizen X is actually an aggressive spy who has gained entry to it's enemies Nation. I'm sure you will agree that this could be disastrous. Can you provide safeguards that would ensure that this couldn't happen?"
Pleased that he didn't trip up on his words this time, Maxwell awaits the reply.
by Oakster » Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:44 pm
Further authorizes the WABC to change a consenting state's border laws to prevent threats to other consenting states and to deal with serious concerns on their behalves
by The Wary Walrus » Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:45 pm
Oakster wrote:Maxwell's concentration slips for a second and returns as the amended draft is put in front of him. Looking through it, he notices at least one bit that has been changed. He steps toward the Translater, although not sure of the correct etiquette, he points to the section in question and says,Further authorizes the WABC to change a consenting state's border laws to prevent threats to other consenting states and to deal with serious concerns on their behalves
"Is this the new addition? If so, I must admit that I don't like the idea of a seperate agency having complete control of my Nations Border, maybe it should read 'Further authorizes the WABC, in consultation and with approval of said Nation, to change a consenting state's border laws to prevent threats to other consenting states and to deal with serious concerns on their behalves'?"
He looks at the wary Walrus for signs of agreement.
by Tinfect » Sat Jul 02, 2016 4:44 pm
The Wary Walrus wrote:Further authorizes the WABC to change a consenting state's border laws to prevent threats to other consenting states and to deal with serious concerns on their behalves,
Imperium Central News Network: EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL CITIZENS ARE TO PROCEED TO EVACUATION SITES IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL FURTHER SUBSPACE SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS ARE TO BE DISABLED IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: THE FOLLOWING SYSTEMS ARE ACCESS PROHIBITED BY STANDARD/BLACKOUT [Error: Format Unrecognized] | Indomitable Bastard #283
by The Wary Walrus » Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:00 pm
Tinfect wrote:The Wary Walrus wrote:Further authorizes the WABC to change a consenting state's border laws to prevent threats to other consenting states and to deal with serious concerns on their behalves,
"Ambassador, aside from this resolution's detestable dancing around the laws of the Secretariat, we must object to this clause; surely no sane state will allow their border policy to be managed wholly by an external force? Further, due to the stated goals of this clause, it appears that it will be utilized so as to limit the capacity of the States involved in this foolishness to engage in warfare with one-another. If that is the goal of this clause, it would be far better to simply mandate such, rather than create a barrier that informs States considering the agreement to instead negotiate such independently, something that this draft seems to attempting to avoid."
by Tinfect » Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:19 pm
The Wary Walrus wrote:Ignoring the fact that we have all shown you many times that this proposal is perfectly legal, you are simply incorrect.
The Wary Walrus wrote:Plenty of states enter into bilateral agreements of this sort, the goal here is to allow for that on a much larger scale through the mechanisms of the WA. Indeed, limiting warfare would be an excellent side effect of this I suppose, though nations engaged in beneficial arrangements such as this will be less likely to go to war in the first place.
The Wary Walrus wrote:Finally, back to the legality issue: put your money where your mouth is. Take it to the secretariat, if it's illegal as written (with regards to that clause, obviously there is no category chosen yet), you win. If it's legal as written, you have to pick up my tab at the Stranger's Bar in perpetuity.
Imperium Central News Network: EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL CITIZENS ARE TO PROCEED TO EVACUATION SITES IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL FURTHER SUBSPACE SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS ARE TO BE DISABLED IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: THE FOLLOWING SYSTEMS ARE ACCESS PROHIBITED BY STANDARD/BLACKOUT [Error: Format Unrecognized] | Indomitable Bastard #283
by Oakster » Sat Jul 02, 2016 9:25 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Sat Jul 02, 2016 9:42 pm
by The Wary Walrus » Sun Jul 03, 2016 5:24 am
by The City-States of Kataria » Sun Jul 03, 2016 8:09 am
by The Wary Walrus » Sun Jul 03, 2016 8:12 am
The City-States of Kataria wrote:As Vice President Jackson Alexander steps into his office. He finds two memos on his desk marked Urgent. The first is a letter from the President telling him that he will be serving as a WA ambassador in extension to his duties as VP. The second is a draft of a WA open border policy. After reviewing this he writes a memo to be delivered directly to the WAHQ.
"In review of the Open Border Policy Draft. It has come to my attention that the lack of background checks implied with 'Open Border Policy' would make it very easy for a small group of enemy operatives and/or terrorists to embark on a stealth operation across the border of the City-States of Kataria or any WA member state within Norrland and cause chaos. With this said, I also believe that this bill is beneficial overall to the WA and the international community as a whole and believe that the City-States of Kataria, and by extension the region of Norrland, would be open to endorsing it.
- Vice President of the Federation of The City-States of Kataria, Jackson Alexander"
by Oakster » Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
by Separatist Peoples » Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:42 am
by The Wary Walrus » Wed May 06, 2020 7:15 pm
by Maowi » Thu May 07, 2020 6:35 am
by Kenmoria » Thu May 07, 2020 8:18 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement