Abolishment of WA Security Council

[Lurikastan]

((RETHOUGHT MY VIEW ON THE PROPOSAL THREAD CLOSED))

[The Emmerian Unions]

This is ILLEGAL! So, no.

[Lurikastan]

No according to the WA's own resolutions as I interpret them the Security Council as it exists now is illegal. Now I do welcome more criticism, and I welcome positive comments.

[The Emmerian Unions]

The Security Council only does Commendation and Condemnations of nations. Nothing more.

This part is the illegal part:

The Passage of this Resolution will officially ((OOC: via coding)) or unofficially ((OOC: By our collected will powers)) abolish the WA Security Council as it stands today, and if this Resolution fails to pass then WA Resolution 2 must be amended or overturned, as there is a conflict in the law books.

[Lurikastan]

But the aforementioned processes mostly the Condemnation process is in violation of the quoted text. The section of my proposal that you quoted wont be in the official proposal though.

[The Emmerian Unions]

<<OOC: *headdesks* Ok, I'm going to LEAVE this thread before I do something I will regret, due to my rage levels right now. Good bye and good day.>>

[Lurikastan]

((OOC: Bye, have a nice day...))

[Allrule]

Changes game mechanics. Illegal.

[Unibot]

As the other players have mentioned. If you really wish to abolish the WASC, bring up the issue in Technical , as a technical complaint or what not. Proposals aren't allowed if they require subsequent coding to fulfill its claims.

And I don't believe thats a violation of that clause ...

"Whilst WA Member States may engage in wars, the World Assembly as a body maintains neutrality in matters of civil and international strife."

There is no definition for neutrality. I would see it as the WA remaining neutral so long as they don't engage in warfare directly - hence the ban on a WA army for writing proposals.

And also, for an example of the WASC's legality,

As I see it, the GA has already condemned terrorism by member-states, so to further condemn those nations that persist seems entirely logical, and legal.

[Unibot]

Ah, alas you've closed discussion.

Have a nice day.