Page 2 of 148

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:54 am
by Leppikania
Wrapper wrote:
Leppikania wrote:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: ugrain_1457344663

Cut down on Arms Manufacturing

A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.


Category: Gun Control

Decision: Tighten

Proposed by: Ugrain

Description: Significantly cut down on arms manufacturing to prevent access of guns and weapons to extremist groups.

Approvals: 2 (Ugrain, Vancouvia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 102 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 3 hours

More blog, this time a one-liner.

I'm not entirely sure this one is illegal. It's a one-liner, but that one line is an operational clause that tells nations what to do.

Kyrozerkia wrote:Proposals need to be more than just empty rhetoric. This includes repeals with no argument, one-liners, proposals that are questions ("Don't you think we should...?"), and proposals that are just too incomprehensible to make sense of.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:52 am
by Kryozerkia
Wrapper wrote:
Leppikania wrote:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: ugrain_1457344663

Cut down on Arms Manufacturing

A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.


Category: Gun Control

Decision: Tighten

Proposed by: Ugrain

Description: Significantly cut down on arms manufacturing to prevent access of guns and weapons to extremist groups.

Approvals: 2 (Ugrain, Vancouvia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 102 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 3 hours

More blog, this time a one-liner.

I'm not entirely sure this one is illegal. It's a one-liner, but that one line is an operational clause that tells nations what to do.

GAR#25 would prohibit arms manufacturers in member states from supplying weapons, including guns, to "extremist groups", accepting that "extremist groups" is another term for "terrorists"/"terrorist group". If we interpret GAR#25's first and third clauses as prohibiting/preventing access, then this is duplication.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 12:38 pm
by Leppikania
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: pavlonia_islands_1457377321

The Mandatory Jury Act

A resolution to reduce income inequality and increase basic welfare.


Category: Social Justice

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Pavlonia Islands

Description: World Assembly,

Recognizing that many WA member nations have flawed judiciary systems;

Understanding that juries are one of the most democratic elements of the modern judiciary system;

Concerned that many defendants are not getting a fair, just, and democratic trial;

Noting that many WA resolutions have been repealed due to the lack of a mandatory jury system;

Mandates that all WA member nations implement a democratic jury in their criminal court systems;

Urges singular WA nations to require a fair and just trial to all accused persons;

Recognizing that the Mandatory Jury Act can fix undemocratic practices in the judiciary system.

Approvals: 2 (Holy Lord, Kiranden)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 102 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 9 hours

HoC, possibly duplication as well. Category fail too.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 12:54 pm
by Kryozerkia
Leppikania wrote:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: pavlonia_islands_1457377321

The Mandatory Jury Act

A resolution to reduce income inequality and increase basic welfare.


Category: Social Justice

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Pavlonia Islands

Description: World Assembly,

Recognizing that many WA member nations have flawed judiciary systems;

Understanding that juries are one of the most democratic elements of the modern judiciary system;

Concerned that many defendants are not getting a fair, just, and democratic trial;

Noting that many WA resolutions have been repealed due to the lack of a mandatory jury system;

Mandates that all WA member nations implement a democratic jury in their criminal court systems;

Urges singular WA nations to require a fair and just trial to all accused persons;

Recognizing that the Mandatory Jury Act can fix undemocratic practices in the judiciary system.

Approvals: 2 (Holy Lord, Kiranden)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 102 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 9 hours

HoC, possibly duplication as well. Category fail too.

Referencing repealed resolutions is not a house of cards violation, since a) those resolutions aren't active; b) the reference was vague. As for duplication, it does duplicate GAR#37.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 1:48 pm
by Tinfect
Kryozerkia wrote:Referencing repealed resolutions is not a house of cards violation, since a) those resolutions aren't active; b) the reference was vague. As for duplication, it does duplicate GAR#37.


Might I ask as to how? I've looked over #37 quite a bit, mostly to see if the Imperial Court System I had devised was in compliance, and nothing in it requires a Member State to have a jury in its courts.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:17 pm
by Wrapper
Urges singular WA nations to require a fair and just trial to all accused persons

This part clearly duplicates much of GAR#37, which already spells out the requirements for fair and just criminal trials.

Mandates that all WA member nations implement a democratic jury in their criminal court systems

This clause is more interesting though. I'm not sure a "mandates" clause can do the same thing as an "urges", "encourages" or similar clause in existing legislation (e.g., GAR #37's "COMMENDS to the consideration of member nations a jury of the accused's peers as such trial adjudicators"), as technically that could be considered an amendment. Or contradiction. Or duplication. Take your pick.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:40 pm
by Floor 448
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: pavlonia_islands_1457386718

Repeal "Nuclear Arms Possession Act"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#10

Proposed by: Pavlonia Islands

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #10: Nuclear Arms Possession Act (Category: International Security; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This act is clearly a threat to our very existence. We need to put sanctions on nuclear devices of destruction.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 104 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 7 hours

Bloggy, one-liner.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 6:08 pm
by Leppikania
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: frenchona_1457398598

Crime

A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.


Category: International Security

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Frenchona

Description: We should keep under cover police on the warch of people who were suspects of a crime and those who committed a crime but werent caught yet.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 104 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 3 hours

Blog, one-liner, no operative clause.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: new_avalonian_thova_1457399455

Declare Global Warming Real

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.


Category: Environmental

Industry Affected: All Businesses

Proposed by: New Avalonian Thova

Description: Declare Global Warming an actual thing, and encourage nations to take more initiatives to cutting carbon emissions and relying more on sustainable energy.

Approvals: 1 (Kiranden)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 103 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 3 hours

Blog, one-liner, bloody stupid.
PROPOSAL
ID: nottinghaven_1457405299

The Detente Act

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.


Category: Political Stability

Strength: Mild

Proposed by: Nottinghaven

Description: RECOGNIZING that political and world stability is severely affected by the increasing of tensions between nations.

REQUIRES that nations send diplomats to nations where high hostility exists.

REQUIRES that nations try to initiate peace talks or offer an "olive branch" before starting wars or conflicts.

REQUIRES that each nations' leader meet at a specific place and time.

REQUIRES that nations discuss biological and nuclear weapons to avoid risking world stability.

URGES that nations attempt to ease or thaw out political relations with "rival" nation(s).

URGES that nations agree unanimously on the easing of tensions.

This resolution is to help maintain a politically stable world in order to avoid world crisis.

Approvals: 1 (Cowyn)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 103 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 2 hours

Given the amount of micromanaging in it, and the fact that it looks like it's trying to prevent wars, I definitely wouldn't say "political stability/mild"...

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:17 am
by Normlpeople
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: newmist_union_1457424353

Enforcing Human Rights

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Newmist Union

Description: In light that the UN human rights are not met by a significant number of nations, and some have spoken opposition to ever meeting the standards set by the UN Human rights, this law unites states to enforce these following laws for all peoples, in all nations:

-------------------
Article 1 Right to Equality
Article 2 Freedom from Discrimination
Article 3 Right to Life, Liberty, Personal Security
Article 4 Freedom from Slavery
Article 5 Freedom from Torture and Degrading Treatment
Article 6 Right to Recognition as a Person before the Law
Article 7 Right to Equality before the Law
Article 8 Right to Remedy by Competent Tribunal
Article 9 Freedom from Arbitrary Arrest and Exile
Article 10 Right to Fair Public Hearing
Article 11 Right to be Considered Innocent until Proven Guilty
Article 12 Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
Article 13 Right to Free Movement in and out of the Country
Article 14 Right to Asylum in other Countries from Persecution
Article 15 Right to a Nationality and the Freedom to Change It
Article 16 Right to Marriage and Family
Article 17 Right to Own Property
Article 18 Freedom of Belief and Religion
Article 19 Freedom of Opinion and Information
Article 20 Right of Peaceful Assembly and Association
Article 21 Right to Participate in Government and in Free Elections
Article 22 Right to Social Security
Article 23 Right to Desirable Work and to Join Trade Unions
Article 24 Right to Rest and Leisure
Article 25 Right to Adequate Living Standard
Article 26 Right to Education
Article 27 Right to Participate in the Cultural Life of Community
Article 28 Right to a Social Order that Articulates this Document
Article 29 Community Duties Essential to Free and Full Development
Article 30 Freedom from State or Personal Interference in the above Rights
-------------------

Nations that do not follow this, will be met by economic sanctions by the global community, and if clear planes are not laid out to solve these issues, the global community will be forced into taking military action, into either making the criminal nation's government comply, or replace it with one that will.

These measures may seem extreme, but they will improve the rights of all individuals, and ensues all persons are equal under these laws.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 104 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 7 hours

The Armed Kingdom of Normlpeople has not approved this proposal.


Basically a list of titles of non-existent articles. Given references to the UNmentionable organization, wouldn't surprise me if plagiarized. Oh, and requires military action.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 6:00 am
by Grays Harbor
Normlpeople wrote:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: newmist_union_1457424353

Enforcing Human Rights

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Newmist Union

Description: In light that the UN human rights are not met by a significant number of nations, and some have spoken opposition to ever meeting the standards set by the UN Human rights, this law unites states to enforce these following laws for all peoples, in all nations:

-------------------
Article 1 Right to Equality
Article 2 Freedom from Discrimination
Article 3 Right to Life, Liberty, Personal Security
Article 4 Freedom from Slavery
Article 5 Freedom from Torture and Degrading Treatment
Article 6 Right to Recognition as a Person before the Law
Article 7 Right to Equality before the Law
Article 8 Right to Remedy by Competent Tribunal
Article 9 Freedom from Arbitrary Arrest and Exile
Article 10 Right to Fair Public Hearing
Article 11 Right to be Considered Innocent until Proven Guilty
Article 12 Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
Article 13 Right to Free Movement in and out of the Country
Article 14 Right to Asylum in other Countries from Persecution
Article 15 Right to a Nationality and the Freedom to Change It
Article 16 Right to Marriage and Family
Article 17 Right to Own Property
Article 18 Freedom of Belief and Religion
Article 19 Freedom of Opinion and Information
Article 20 Right of Peaceful Assembly and Association
Article 21 Right to Participate in Government and in Free Elections
Article 22 Right to Social Security
Article 23 Right to Desirable Work and to Join Trade Unions
Article 24 Right to Rest and Leisure
Article 25 Right to Adequate Living Standard
Article 26 Right to Education
Article 27 Right to Participate in the Cultural Life of Community
Article 28 Right to a Social Order that Articulates this Document
Article 29 Community Duties Essential to Free and Full Development
Article 30 Freedom from State or Personal Interference in the above Rights
-------------------

Nations that do not follow this, will be met by economic sanctions by the global community, and if clear planes are not laid out to solve these issues, the global community will be forced into taking military action, into either making the criminal nation's government comply, or replace it with one that will.

These measures may seem extreme, but they will improve the rights of all individuals, and ensues all persons are equal under these laws.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 104 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 7 hours

The Armed Kingdom of Normlpeople has not approved this proposal.


Basically a list of titles of non-existent articles. Given references to the UNmentionable organization, wouldn't surprise me if plagiarized. Oh, and requires military action.

It is the UN Universal Declaration of Human Right. A shortened variant of it, to be sure, but each of their articles is the first sentence of the UN UDHR articles. So, yeah, plagiarized.
http://www.un.org/en/universal-declarat ... an-rights/

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 9:10 am
by Leppikania
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: plinyonia_1457453225

Repeal "Prevention of Torture"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#9

Proposed by: Plinyonia

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #9: Prevention of Torture (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Torture is a key tactic to maintaining a nations safety. There is no better way to extract information from hostile and dangerous terrorists.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 104 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days

No operative clause. Also bloviating, although there's no rule against that.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: scottsasia_1457454095

On Space Trade

A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.


Category: Free Trade

Strength: Mild

Proposed by: Scottsasia

Description: RECOGNIZING that Space is its own separate entity from Earth and deserves its own rules and regulations to preserve its integrity.

REALIZING that Space could be used as a free trade route.

UNDERSTANDING that life may be present on other planets.

ALLOWING the use of free trade in Space between other countries and other forms of life.

ACKNOWLIDGING that Space needs to be kept clean and free from pollution.

List of regulations:

Spacecrafts shall be manufactured using eco friendly parts in order to maintain the integrity of space.

Dumping waste into Space shall be prohibited.

Obstruction of another countries spacecraft, while on route to trade, shall be prohibited.

If any of these regulations are broken, the World Assembly will take action in order to preserve the integrity of Space.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 104 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days

Forcing legislation on non-member states, RL reference.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: plinyonia_1457454193

Repeal "Nuclear Material Safeguards"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#351

Proposed by: Plinyonia

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #351: Nuclear Material Safeguards (Category: International Security; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Nations should be responsible for the operation and protection of all nuclear materials and nuclear manufacturing. They should not be assisted or regulated by an outside source. If a nation is advanced enough to have knowledge in nuclear materials then they should also be advanced enough to regulate and protect their knowledge nod materials on their own.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 104 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days

Blog, legislating in a repeal.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 9:51 am
by Grays Harbor
On Space Trade

A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.


Category: Free Trade

Strength: Mild

Proposed by: Scottsasia

Description: RECOGNIZING that Space is its own separate entity from Earth and deserves its own rules and regulations to preserve its integrity.

REALIZING that Space could be used as a free trade route.

UNDERSTANDING that life may be present on other planets.

ALLOWING the use of free trade in Space between other countries and other forms of life.

ACKNOWLIDGING that Space needs to be kept clean and free from pollution.

List of regulations:

Spacecrafts shall be manufactured using eco friendly parts in order to maintain the integrity of space.

Dumping waste into Space shall be prohibited.

Obstruction of another countries spacecraft, while on route to trade, shall be prohibited.

If any of these regulations are broken, the World Assembly will take action in order to preserve the integrity of Space.

NS =/= Earth

-------------------

Repeal "Nuclear Material Safeguards"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#351

Proposed by: Plinyonia

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #351: Nuclear Material Safeguards (Category: International Security; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Nations should be responsible for the operation and protection of all nuclear materials and nuclear manufacturing. They should not be assisted or regulated by an outside source. If a nation is advanced enough to have knowledge in nuclear materials then they should also be advanced enough to regulate and protect their knowledge nod materials on their own.

Appears NatSov only

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:34 am
by Wallenburg
Grays Harbor wrote:*SNIP*

Look up.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:45 am
by Imperium Anglorum
Leppikania wrote:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: plinyonia_1457454193

Repeal "Nuclear Material Safeguards"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#351

Proposed by: Plinyonia

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #351: Nuclear Material Safeguards (Category: International Security; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Nations should be responsible for the operation and protection of all nuclear materials and nuclear manufacturing. They should not be assisted or regulated by an outside source. If a nation is advanced enough to have knowledge in nuclear materials then they should also be advanced enough to regulate and protect their knowledge nod materials on their own.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 104 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days

Blog, legislating in a repeal.

It's also a shitty argument as well as lacking a repeals clause.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:20 am
by Grays Harbor
Wallenburg wrote:
Grays Harbor wrote:*SNIP*

Look up.

OK, I did. Nice ceiling.

:p

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:49 pm
by Wallenburg
Legalize Recreational Cocaine

A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.

Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Legalize
Proposed by: Anti-Semitic Memers

Description: [b][u]Legalize Recreational Cocaine[u][b]

Under this proposal, all WA members must conform to legalizing the drug cocaine. We should enact this decriminalization for several reasons, which are listed below:

Promoting a free market will cripple the economy of illegal organizations.
Illicit drug activity rates will decrease.

Regulations and taxes on cocaine would both eliminate the drug problem [i]and[i] give the nations tax revenue.

Sales of illegal drugs are among the #1 cause of violence and death in most countries.

It is the moral right to legalize recreational cocaine, as it is unjust to take away the basic human right to consume what they want. The issue of drug crime would itself be solved with this proposal. This has clearly been proven before, and we will prove it now, with your delegation and its support. Thank you.

NS =/= Earth (and even if it were, those figures are bullshit), bloggish.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 2:09 pm
by Grays Harbor
Right to Work

A resolution to develop industry around the world.


Category: Advancement of Industry

Area of Effect: Labor Deregulation

Proposed by: Dubnia

Description: The General Assembly,

Noting that many countries with large labor unions may require workers to join a union or pay dues to it,

Acknowledging that large unions that have control over employees in this manner are destructive to the end that they were created to strive towards,

Urges member nations to allow workers to choose whether or not to join a labor union;

Asks member nations to prevent labor unions from charging dues to non-members or requiring members of unions to perform certain actions not directly related to the execution of their job.


Already Covered and much better, so, pointless duplication.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 2:44 pm
by Leppikania
Grays Harbor wrote:
Right to Work

A resolution to develop industry around the world.


Category: Advancement of Industry

Area of Effect: Labor Deregulation

Proposed by: Dubnia

Description: The General Assembly,

Noting that many countries with large labor unions may require workers to join a union or pay dues to it,

Acknowledging that large unions that have control over employees in this manner are destructive to the end that they were created to strive towards,

Urges member nations to allow workers to choose whether or not to join a labor union;

Asks member nations to prevent labor unions from charging dues to non-members or requiring members of unions to perform certain actions not directly related to the execution of their job.


Already Covered and much better, so, pointless duplication.

Also wrong category. It should be in Social Justice.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 3:20 pm
by Sierra Lyricalia
Leppikania wrote:
Grays Harbor wrote:
Right to Work

A resolution to develop industry around the world.


Category: Advancement of Industry

Area of Effect: Labor Deregulation

Proposed by: Dubnia

Description: The General Assembly,

Noting that many countries with large labor unions may require workers to join a union or pay dues to it,

Acknowledging that large unions that have control over employees in this manner are destructive to the end that they were created to strive towards,

Urges member nations to allow workers to choose whether or not to join a labor union;

Asks member nations to prevent labor unions from charging dues to non-members or requiring members of unions to perform certain actions not directly related to the execution of their job.


Already Covered and much better, so, pointless duplication.

Also wrong category. It should be in Social Justice.


No. Weakening labor unions is definitely AoI/Labor Deregulation.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 3:53 pm
by Leppikania
Sierra Lyricalia wrote:
Leppikania wrote:Also wrong category. It should be in Social Justice.


No. Weakening labor unions is definitely AoI/Labor Deregulation.

I was more looking at the "giving every worker a right to join a union".

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 6:06 pm
by Wallenburg
Leppikania wrote:
Sierra Lyricalia wrote:
No. Weakening labor unions is definitely AoI/Labor Deregulation.

I was more looking at the "giving every worker a right to join a union".

That wouldn't be social justice either. Rather, that would fall under human rights.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 6:59 pm
by Grays Harbor
Sexual Health and Education Act

A resolution to promote funding and the development of education and the arts.


Category: Education and Creativity

Area of Effect: Educational

Proposed by: Zenatias

Description: The purpose of this act is to ensure that all public school students of specified ages are given access to factual, educational, non-threatening material in regards to sexual education.

ACKNOWLEDGING- That due to certain cultural/religious/personal beliefs, many people encourage "abstinence-only" lessons for minors. However, "Comprehensive" Sex Education has proven to be more effective in terms of reducing the number of teenage pregnancies worldwide, and the spread of sexually-transmitted infections, as well as making minors feel more comfortable and informed about their bodies.

ESTABLISHING- That all public schools include comprehensive Sex Education as part of their course curriculum, for those aged 10 to 18 years old.

CLARIFYING- The aspects of the act

1) The curriculum must give students accurate information on STIs, teen pregnancy, reproductive rights, pubescence, sexuality, gender identity, human anatomy, and methods of birth control. For those between the ages of 10 and 13 years old, only information on pubescence, sexuality, gender identity, and human anatomy are required. For students aged 13 and up, the curriculum must include lessons on STIs, teenage pregnancy, reproductive rights, and birth control as well. Age-appropriateness should be taken into consideration when planning how to approach each topic.

2) Parents may exempt their children from the entire course through contacting the school. Children may be excused from a particular lesson if they find the material to be upsetting, offensive, or distressing. Every effort should be made to accommodate modest children who are embarrassed by course materials, such as not requiring such students to answer a given question out loud. Students excused from the required course will be required to take a standard health course instead. Students asking to be excused from a particular lesson may sit in the hallway outside of the classroom or go to a designated study hall at the discretion of the teacher.

3) This course will not advocate underage sexual activity. Instead, this course will make the children aware of the emotional and physical risks of underage sexuality, and will instruct them how to look out for their best interests. Class materials should be factual, non-threatening, and thorough. However, pornographic content is strictly prohibited; this includes pornographic videos, images, writings, and other visuals.

4) It is not mandatory for private education to systems to offer Sex Education lessons, but encouraged nonetheless.

HEREBY- Establishes mandatory Comprehensive Sexual Education curriculum in public schools worldwide.

Ages mandated. Ridiculous amount of micromanagement.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:01 pm
by Leppikania
Grays Harbor wrote:
Sexual Health and Education Act

A resolution to promote funding and the development of education and the arts.


Category: Education and Creativity

Area of Effect: Educational

Proposed by: Zenatias

Description: The purpose of this act is to ensure that all public school students of specified ages are given access to factual, educational, non-threatening material in regards to sexual education.

ACKNOWLEDGING- That due to certain cultural/religious/personal beliefs, many people encourage "abstinence-only" lessons for minors. However, "Comprehensive" Sex Education has proven to be more effective in terms of reducing the number of teenage pregnancies worldwide, and the spread of sexually-transmitted infections, as well as making minors feel more comfortable and informed about their bodies.

ESTABLISHING- That all public schools include comprehensive Sex Education as part of their course curriculum, for those aged 10 to 18 years old.

CLARIFYING- The aspects of the act

1) The curriculum must give students accurate information on STIs, teen pregnancy, reproductive rights, pubescence, sexuality, gender identity, human anatomy, and methods of birth control. For those between the ages of 10 and 13 years old, only information on pubescence, sexuality, gender identity, and human anatomy are required. For students aged 13 and up, the curriculum must include lessons on STIs, teenage pregnancy, reproductive rights, and birth control as well. Age-appropriateness should be taken into consideration when planning how to approach each topic.

2) Parents may exempt their children from the entire course through contacting the school. Children may be excused from a particular lesson if they find the material to be upsetting, offensive, or distressing. Every effort should be made to accommodate modest children who are embarrassed by course materials, such as not requiring such students to answer a given question out loud. Students excused from the required course will be required to take a standard health course instead. Students asking to be excused from a particular lesson may sit in the hallway outside of the classroom or go to a designated study hall at the discretion of the teacher.

3) This course will not advocate underage sexual activity. Instead, this course will make the children aware of the emotional and physical risks of underage sexuality, and will instruct them how to look out for their best interests. Class materials should be factual, non-threatening, and thorough. However, pornographic content is strictly prohibited; this includes pornographic videos, images, writings, and other visuals.

4) It is not mandatory for private education to systems to offer Sex Education lessons, but encouraged nonetheless.

HEREBY- Establishes mandatory Comprehensive Sexual Education curriculum in public schools worldwide.

Ages mandated. Ridiculous amount of micromanagement.

So, what part about it makes it illegal?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:33 pm
by Phydios
Leppikania wrote:
Grays Harbor wrote:
Sexual Health and Education Act

A resolution to promote funding and the development of education and the arts.


Category: Education and Creativity

Area of Effect: Educational

Proposed by: Zenatias

Description: The purpose of this act is to ensure that all public school students of specified ages are given access to factual, educational, non-threatening material in regards to sexual education.

ACKNOWLEDGING- That due to certain cultural/religious/personal beliefs, many people encourage "abstinence-only" lessons for minors. However, "Comprehensive" Sex Education has proven to be more effective in terms of reducing the number of teenage pregnancies worldwide, and the spread of sexually-transmitted infections, as well as making minors feel more comfortable and informed about their bodies.

ESTABLISHING- That all public schools include comprehensive Sex Education as part of their course curriculum, for those aged 10 to 18 years old.

CLARIFYING- The aspects of the act

1) The curriculum must give students accurate information on STIs, teen pregnancy, reproductive rights, pubescence, sexuality, gender identity, human anatomy, and methods of birth control. For those between the ages of 10 and 13 years old, only information on pubescence, sexuality, gender identity, and human anatomy are required. For students aged 13 and up, the curriculum must include lessons on STIs, teenage pregnancy, reproductive rights, and birth control as well. Age-appropriateness should be taken into consideration when planning how to approach each topic.

2) Parents may exempt their children from the entire course through contacting the school. Children may be excused from a particular lesson if they find the material to be upsetting, offensive, or distressing. Every effort should be made to accommodate modest children who are embarrassed by course materials, such as not requiring such students to answer a given question out loud. Students excused from the required course will be required to take a standard health course instead. Students asking to be excused from a particular lesson may sit in the hallway outside of the classroom or go to a designated study hall at the discretion of the teacher.

3) This course will not advocate underage sexual activity. Instead, this course will make the children aware of the emotional and physical risks of underage sexuality, and will instruct them how to look out for their best interests. Class materials should be factual, non-threatening, and thorough. However, pornographic content is strictly prohibited; this includes pornographic videos, images, writings, and other visuals.

4) It is not mandatory for private education to systems to offer Sex Education lessons, but encouraged nonetheless.

HEREBY- Establishes mandatory Comprehensive Sexual Education curriculum in public schools worldwide.

Ages mandated. Ridiculous amount of micromanagement.

So, what part about it makes it illegal?

I think we've forgotten the first word in this thread's title...

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:11 pm
by Leppikania
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: abshirsaidfederal_1457577601

Provide Basic Income

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights

Strength: Mild

Proposed by: AbshirSaidFederal

Description: The Reason why basic income is a step to strong economy is that it will help citizens get on there feet that are unemployed and provide them with a decent living + their current job income.

>With the insurance of having unconditional basic income as a safety net, workers can challenge their employers if they find their conditions of work unfair or degrading.

>With a minimum level of security guaranteed to all citizens and less time in work or worrying about work, innovation in political, social, economic and technological terms would be a made more lively part of everyday life and its concerns.

This is why i Believe that basic income should be provided.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 105 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 1 hour

Blog, category fail.