Advertisement
by Araraukar » Thu Dec 29, 2016 9:03 pm
The Atlae Isles wrote:Atrocious spelling (not illegal), blogette (I think), NOC
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Bears Armed Mission » Fri Dec 30, 2016 10:15 am
Araraukar wrote:I think "nonsense" is still allowable as a removal reason.
Proposal Basics: Proposals must be written as laws, not commentaries, editorials, etc.even if no other reason exists anyway.
ID: distritos_federados_de_itabatan-bangu-tu_1483101176
Universal Gun Control Act
A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Relax
Proposed by: Distritos Federados de Itabatan-Bangu-Tu
Gun control has miserably failed to protect its citizens for the crimes in many heavily regulated crimes, and when it is crimes, they are psychotic dictatorships. This proposal aims to ensure:
Right guaranteed by law to access to arms
Sanctions for countries that prohibit their citizens from having weapons
Sanctions for regions that prohibit their citizens from having weapons
A fine of 5% of GDP for countries that process total ban on their legislation
Approvals: 2 (Tinhampton, Triggered States of America)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 102 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 2 days 23 hours
by The Atlae Isles » Fri Dec 30, 2016 6:48 pm
Bears Armed Mission wrote:ID: distritos_federados_de_itabatan-bangu-tu_1483101176
Universal Gun Control Act
A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Relax
Proposed by: Distritos Federados de Itabatan-Bangu-Tu
Gun control has miserably failed to protect its citizens for the crimes in many heavily regulated crimes, and when it is crimes, they are psychotic dictatorships. This proposal aims to ensure:
Right guaranteed by law to access to arms
Sanctions for countries that prohibit their citizens from having weapons
Sanctions for regions that prohibit their citizens from having weapons
A fine of 5% of GDP for countries that process total ban on their legislation
Approvals: 2 (Tinhampton, Triggered States of America)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 102 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 2 days 23 hours
No operative clause.
by The Atlae Isles » Fri Dec 30, 2016 10:38 pm
General Assembly Proposal
ID: amgelica_1482907672
Symbol Of Fair Trial
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Amgelica
In 2008 “The Right to Fair Trial” was passed and within a few months overturned by repeal. Noting that all countries have some since of legal system, but many also choose not told a judicial system. Observing that there is currently no guarantee of justice for those accused of criminal acts. Many alliances are formed by the bond of political ties that connect nations. International law doesn’t require law presently enforcing a fair trial. Every country has the right to ensure their nations ideals are kept. Fairness of people, governments, nations, and regions, is crucial with any political equality.
Hereby mandating that all WA members should have a symbol that states whether the nation supports “Fair Trial” or “Unjust Trails”. Every WA member nations will guarantee they will comply by placing a symbol of one or the other. The guidelines for each of the two symbols are decided by the following requirements:
Section 1: Fair Trial Qualification
A fair trial symbol with only be provided if more than half the points meet the legal system of said country. At least five of the points must be met to qualify for a symbol of a “Fair Trial” based nation. All other will be giving the “Unjust” system for denying “Fair Trail” based right to citzens.
Article I. That the accused be seen as innocent until proven guilty beyond all reasonable doubt, thus placing the onus of proof on the prosecuting authority.
Article II. That the defendant be given the right to present his case or to be represented by a person of his choosing.
Article III. That the evidence shall be considered by an impartial jury of no less than 5 people and presided over by a judge with knowledge of the laws being applied and the requirements for a trial.
Article IV. That all persons shall have the right to remain silent when questioned, and exercising this right shall not be used as evidence against them in court.
Article V. That information and testimony may not be extracted under duress or using any form of physical or psychological torture.
Article VI. That the defendant shall have the right to question any witness who provides evidence.
Article VII. That the defendant be entitled to appeal against both the sentence and verdict that has been passed.
Article VIII. That any punitive sentence passed by a court be proportional to the crime committed.
Article IX. That the proceedings of the trial conclude within a reasonable time period.
Approvals: 28 (Laas Ahrk Stin, The Confederacy of the Republic, Tinhampton, Ancient Free and Accepted Masons, Colandane, United Sates of Merica, New Californiia, AshIsland, San Lumen, Texas and Greater America, World Peace and Prosperity, Tobiasia, Of the Democratic Party, Ordin Apuchi, Tizen, Bustium, Electrona, Bellwyne, Seremenis, Land of Herbs, Southern Dignity, Freycrest, Viscondy, Las Estrella, Loustania, Hatay, Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Kokoton)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 76 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 11 hours
by The Two Jerseys » Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:48 pm
The Atlae Isles wrote:General Assembly Proposal
ID: amgelica_1482907672
Symbol Of Fair Trial
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Amgelica
In 2008 “The Right to Fair Trial” was passed and within a few months overturned by repeal. Noting that all countries have some since of legal system, but many also choose not told a judicial system. Observing that there is currently no guarantee of justice for those accused of criminal acts. Many alliances are formed by the bond of political ties that connect nations. International law doesn’t require law presently enforcing a fair trial. Every country has the right to ensure their nations ideals are kept. Fairness of people, governments, nations, and regions, is crucial with any political equality.
Hereby mandating that all WA members should have a symbol that states whether the nation supports “Fair Trial” or “Unjust Trails”. Every WA member nations will guarantee they will comply by placing a symbol of one or the other. The guidelines for each of the two symbols are decided by the following requirements:
Section 1: Fair Trial Qualification
A fair trial symbol with only be provided if more than half the points meet the legal system of said country. At least five of the points must be met to qualify for a symbol of a “Fair Trial” based nation. All other will be giving the “Unjust” system for denying “Fair Trail” based right to citzens.
Article I. That the accused be seen as innocent until proven guilty beyond all reasonable doubt, thus placing the onus of proof on the prosecuting authority.
Article II. That the defendant be given the right to present his case or to be represented by a person of his choosing.
Article III. That the evidence shall be considered by an impartial jury of no less than 5 people and presided over by a judge with knowledge of the laws being applied and the requirements for a trial.
Article IV. That all persons shall have the right to remain silent when questioned, and exercising this right shall not be used as evidence against them in court.
Article V. That information and testimony may not be extracted under duress or using any form of physical or psychological torture.
Article VI. That the defendant shall have the right to question any witness who provides evidence.
Article VII. That the defendant be entitled to appeal against both the sentence and verdict that has been passed.
Article VIII. That any punitive sentence passed by a court be proportional to the crime committed.
Article IX. That the proceedings of the trial conclude within a reasonable time period.
Approvals: 28 (Laas Ahrk Stin, The Confederacy of the Republic, Tinhampton, Ancient Free and Accepted Masons, Colandane, United Sates of Merica, New Californiia, AshIsland, San Lumen, Texas and Greater America, World Peace and Prosperity, Tobiasia, Of the Democratic Party, Ordin Apuchi, Tizen, Bustium, Electrona, Bellwyne, Seremenis, Land of Herbs, Southern Dignity, Freycrest, Viscondy, Las Estrella, Loustania, Hatay, Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Kokoton)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 76 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 11 hours
References to RL, blogette at beginning
by The Atlae Isles » Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:51 pm
The Two Jerseys wrote:The Atlae Isles wrote:General Assembly Proposal
ID: amgelica_1482907672
Symbol Of Fair Trial
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Amgelica
In 2008 “The Right to Fair Trial” was passed and within a few months overturned by repeal. Noting that all countries have some since of legal system, but many also choose not told a judicial system. Observing that there is currently no guarantee of justice for those accused of criminal acts. Many alliances are formed by the bond of political ties that connect nations. International law doesn’t require law presently enforcing a fair trial. Every country has the right to ensure their nations ideals are kept. Fairness of people, governments, nations, and regions, is crucial with any political equality.
Hereby mandating that all WA members should have a symbol that states whether the nation supports “Fair Trial” or “Unjust Trails”. Every WA member nations will guarantee they will comply by placing a symbol of one or the other. The guidelines for each of the two symbols are decided by the following requirements:
Section 1: Fair Trial Qualification
A fair trial symbol with only be provided if more than half the points meet the legal system of said country. At least five of the points must be met to qualify for a symbol of a “Fair Trial” based nation. All other will be giving the “Unjust” system for denying “Fair Trail” based right to citzens.
Article I. That the accused be seen as innocent until proven guilty beyond all reasonable doubt, thus placing the onus of proof on the prosecuting authority.
Article II. That the defendant be given the right to present his case or to be represented by a person of his choosing.
Article III. That the evidence shall be considered by an impartial jury of no less than 5 people and presided over by a judge with knowledge of the laws being applied and the requirements for a trial.
Article IV. That all persons shall have the right to remain silent when questioned, and exercising this right shall not be used as evidence against them in court.
Article V. That information and testimony may not be extracted under duress or using any form of physical or psychological torture.
Article VI. That the defendant shall have the right to question any witness who provides evidence.
Article VII. That the defendant be entitled to appeal against both the sentence and verdict that has been passed.
Article VIII. That any punitive sentence passed by a court be proportional to the crime committed.
Article IX. That the proceedings of the trial conclude within a reasonable time period.
Approvals: 28 (Laas Ahrk Stin, The Confederacy of the Republic, Tinhampton, Ancient Free and Accepted Masons, Colandane, United Sates of Merica, New Californiia, AshIsland, San Lumen, Texas and Greater America, World Peace and Prosperity, Tobiasia, Of the Democratic Party, Ordin Apuchi, Tizen, Bustium, Electrona, Bellwyne, Seremenis, Land of Herbs, Southern Dignity, Freycrest, Viscondy, Las Estrella, Loustania, Hatay, Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Kokoton)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 76 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 11 hours
References to RL, blogette at beginning
I'm not seeing any RL references.
Game mechanics, on the other hand...
by Bakhton » Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:53 pm
by The Two Jerseys » Sat Dec 31, 2016 12:09 am
Bakhton wrote:
Article 1 has a lot of RL legal terminology. "Article I. That the accused be seen as innocent until proven guilty beyond all reasonable doubt, thus placing the onus of proof on the prosecuting authority
its a bit rl I think
by The Atlae Isles » Sat Dec 31, 2016 12:38 am
by Bakhton » Sat Dec 31, 2016 12:44 am
The Two Jerseys wrote:Find a way to say "innocent until proven guilty" that doesn't reflect RL terminology without falling afoul of the "use comprehensible English" rule.
Go on, I'll wait.
by Bears Armed Mission » Sat Dec 31, 2016 5:05 am
ID: calusahatchii_1483156869
Abolish Enforced Nudity
A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Calusahatchii
This resolution will abolish the fascist policies of "Enforced Nudity". It would make all member nations have to abolish that act. This act only applies to enforced nudity.
Approvals: 0
Status: Lacking Support (requires 104 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 2 days 16 hours
by Bears Armed » Sat Dec 31, 2016 5:15 am
Bears Armed Mission wrote:ID: calusahatchii_1483156869
Abolish Enforced Nudity
A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Calusahatchii
This resolution will abolish the fascist policies of "Enforced Nudity". It would make all member nations have to abolish that act. This act only applies to enforced nudity.
Approvals: 0
Status: Lacking Support (requires 104 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 2 days 16 hours
Wrong category: Because this would bar member nations from mandating certain behaviour by their inhabitants, this should actually be 'Human Rights'. Also, no operative clause.
I'll send a TG to the author.
by Grays Harbor » Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:20 pm
Stop Overfishing
A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.
Category: Environmental
Industry Affected: Fishing
Proposed by: Calusahatchii
This proposal would make overfishing illegal in all international waters and claimed waters. This would help the currently endangered species of fish to repopulate.
by States of Glory WA Office » Sat Dec 31, 2016 6:02 pm
Bears Armed Mission wrote:
Wrong category: Because this would bar member nations from mandating certain behaviour by their inhabitants, this should actually be 'Human Rights'.
I'll send a TG to the author.
by Imperium Anglorum » Sat Dec 31, 2016 8:31 pm
States of Glory WA Office wrote:Also, the proposal uses the word 'fascist', though I'm not sure if that is actually illegal. Wouldn't it technically be a RW reference?
by The United Royal Islands of Euramathania » Sun Jan 01, 2017 1:32 am
States of Glory WA Office wrote:Also, the proposal uses the word 'fascist'', though I'm not sure if that is actually illegal. Wouldn't it technically be a RW reference?
by Grays Harbor » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:38 pm
The Pen Is Mightier Than The Sword
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: ISAANATION
Emperor Jahrome of Isaanation/Empire proposes that during a lot of recent conflicts escalating into more easily avoidable conflicts the increase in military grade weapon manufacturing and Governmental breakdowns leading to further Crisis and thus starting a chain of events has caused global up roar affecting non conflicting countries, nations and empires.
An increase in innocents being bombarded by cross fire airstrikes, wars and troops using their homes as dossing spots and free for all drive by's has my nation at the knees as we have agreed to take in the innocent families and residents caught up in conflict they didn't deserve nor ask for, I feel more nations with a mindset like that of ours should be doing more to aid the situation and not just in helping innocents, but finding solutions without physical combat to try and lower tensions and make more alliances?
There are a huge chunk of nations with enough fire power to wipe people of the globe but not enough of these super powers are doing anything about healthcare, education, human and animal rights, gun control, crime and so on and then being at the mercy of un happy civilians preaching a false pretense things will better soon. It will if governments do more because this will effect the healthcare system, education will become endangered for the children of the future and the next generation will be raised into a wold where they believe it is okay to attack anything that doesn't give you as you please and wage conflicts for the sake of cheese?
It won't be so apparent today but the aftermath could prove a global crisis for the people of tomorrow we need a scheme/resolution mightier than the sword (we are all human beings)- Regards Isaanation Empire.
by Kitzerland » Mon Jan 02, 2017 6:53 am
Grays Harbor wrote:The Pen Is Mightier Than The Sword
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: ISAANATION
Emperor Jahrome of Isaanation/Empire proposes that during a lot of recent conflicts escalating into more easily avoidable conflicts the increase in military grade weapon manufacturing and Governmental breakdowns leading to further Crisis and thus starting a chain of events has caused global up roar affecting non conflicting countries, nations and empires.
An increase in innocents being bombarded by cross fire airstrikes, wars and troops using their homes as dossing spots and free for all drive by's has my nation at the knees as we have agreed to take in the innocent families and residents caught up in conflict they didn't deserve nor ask for, I feel more nations with a mindset like that of ours should be doing more to aid the situation and not just in helping innocents, but finding solutions without physical combat to try and lower tensions and make more alliances?
There are a huge chunk of nations with enough fire power to wipe people of the globe but not enough of these super powers are doing anything about healthcare, education, human and animal rights, gun control, crime and so on and then being at the mercy of un happy civilians preaching a false pretense things will better soon. It will if governments do more because this will effect the healthcare system, education will become endangered for the children of the future and the next generation will be raised into a wold where they believe it is okay to attack anything that doesn't give you as you please and wage conflicts for the sake of cheese?
It won't be so apparent today but the aftermath could prove a global crisis for the people of tomorrow we need a scheme/resolution mightier than the sword (we are all human beings)- Regards Isaanation Empire.
Branding and blogging
by Araraukar » Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:25 am
Kitzerland wrote:Also, Not On Character and what on earth are "wage conflicts for the sake of cheese"?
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by The Atlae Isles » Mon Jan 02, 2017 11:55 am
by Kitzerland » Mon Jan 02, 2017 12:19 pm
by Araraukar » Mon Jan 02, 2017 12:27 pm
The Atlae Isles wrote:Wait, I was taught NOC meant "No Operative Clause." I think that it should also contain OOC, or "Out of Character."
Kitzerland wrote:I thought NOC was No operative clause...
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Grays Harbor » Mon Jan 02, 2017 12:53 pm
More Gun Control
A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Bishek
we can't just have rouge nations running around with guns we need to act now
Approvals: 0
by Kitzerland » Mon Jan 02, 2017 1:01 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:More Gun Control
A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Bishek
we can't just have rouge nations running around with guns we need to act now
Approvals: 0
No operative clause, bumper sticker
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
