Illegal GA Proposals 2nd edition

[Dreadton]

General Assembly Proposal
ID: whiskany_1595511752
Repeal: “International Criminal Protocol”

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#500

Proposed by: Whiskany

General Assembly Resolution #500 “International Criminal Protocol” (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The Dark Empire of Whiskany will not comply nor should any nation viewing this as a vast overreach. Whiskany has one of the lowest crime rates in the known world and this would only weaken our judicial system.
- Many nations are much like this, this would weaken our efforts to deter crime.

Whiskany Will handle criminals as defined below and strongly advises other nations to do so as well.

Violent/Capital/State Criminals:
- Will be executed immediately, they will have 15 days for an appeal

Non-violent/petty theft/simple criminals:
-Will receive long sentences of which they may work them off at state industries
-This will allow them to lessen their sentence
-Will be executed if additional crime is committed within custody or withing 5 years if release

Dark Lord Voladay

Approvals: 0
GenSec Status: LEGAL
Info

Status: Lacking Support (requires 68 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 2 hours

The Trifecta,
NAtSov, Honest Mistake, Legislating in a Repeal

[Kaeyoku]

General Assembly Proposal
ID: whiskany_1595511752
Repeal: “International Criminal Protocol”

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#500

Proposed by: Whiskany

General Assembly Resolution #500 “International Criminal Protocol” (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The Dark Empire of Whiskany will not comply nor should any nation viewing this as a vast overreach. Whiskany has one of the lowest crime rates in the known world and this would only weaken our judicial system.
- Many nations are much like this, this would weaken our efforts to deter crime.

Whiskany Will handle criminals as defined below and strongly advises other nations to do so as well.

Violent/Capital/State Criminals:
- Will be executed immediately, they will have 15 days for an appeal

Non-violent/petty theft/simple criminals:
-Will receive long sentences of which they may work them off at state industries
-This will allow them to lessen their sentence
-Will be executed if additional crime is committed within custody or withing 5 years if release

Dark Lord Voladay

Approvals: 0
GenSec Status: LEGAL
Info

Status: Lacking Support (requires 68 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 2 hours

The Trifecta,
NAtSov, Honest Mistake, Legislating in a Repeal

My opinion on said repeal is and always will be unknown.

[Grays Harbor]

The Trifecta,
NAtSov, Honest Mistake, Legislating in a Repeal

My opinion on said repeal is and always will be unknown.

Good for you. Then don’t spam.

[Merni]

General Assembly Proposal
ID: helvecios_1595811934

Repeal: “Access To Abortion”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal
Resolution: GA#499
Proposed by: Helvecios
General Assembly Resolution #499 “Access to Abortion” (Category: Health; Area of Effect: Healthcare) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Resultados de búsqueda

General Assembly Resolution #499 “Access to Abortion” (Category: Health; Area of Effect: Healthcare) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Revocación para las libertades de gobierno para cada nación
Categoría:Salud Área de Efecto:Salud
Propuesto por : La Confederación de Helvecios
Por la presente propongo revocar la resolución de la asamblea mundial númer
General Assembly Resolution # 499 “Access to Abortion” (Category: Health; Area of ​​Effect: Healthcare)

Revocation for the liberties of government for each nation
Category: Health Area of ​​Effect: Health
Proposed by: The Helvetian Confederation
I hereby propose to revoke the resolution of the world assembly number 499 "Access to Abortion"
Beyond the right of any citizen to do what they want with their body, I propose to revoke this resolution because I consider that each nation should have a right over its jurisdiction in an issue such as abortion that does not imply doing what you want with your own body if not the death of innocent creatures that are not to blame
Define
1 Each nation has a right over its jurisdiction on an issue of such importance as abortion Giving each nation the freedom to approach the issue of legalization of abortion
2 However, all members of the world assembly must facilitate access to contraceptives and in case of rape, sexual abuse, or lack of income to raise the baby, encourage adoption programs to eliminate abortion that causes death. from the baby and sometimes from the mother

Sincerely :
The Helvetian Confederation

Approvals: 0

GenSec Status: LEGAL
Info

Not written in English, proposal basics, legislation in repeal, natsov

[Godular]

General Assembly Proposal
ID: helvecios_1595811934

Repeal: “Access To Abortion”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal
Resolution: GA#499
Proposed by: Helvecios
General Assembly Resolution #499 “Access to Abortion” (Category: Health; Area of Effect: Healthcare) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Resultados de búsqueda

General Assembly Resolution #499 “Access to Abortion” (Category: Health; Area of Effect: Healthcare) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Revocación para las libertades de gobierno para cada nación
Categoría:Salud Área de Efecto:Salud
Propuesto por : La Confederación de Helvecios
Por la presente propongo revocar la resolución de la asamblea mundial númer
General Assembly Resolution # 499 “Access to Abortion” (Category: Health; Area of ​​Effect: Healthcare)

Revocation for the liberties of government for each nation
Category: Health Area of ​​Effect: Health
Proposed by: The Helvetian Confederation
I hereby propose to revoke the resolution of the world assembly number 499 "Access to Abortion"
Beyond the right of any citizen to do what they want with their body, I propose to revoke this resolution because I consider that each nation should have a right over its jurisdiction in an issue such as abortion that does not imply doing what you want with your own body if not the death of innocent creatures that are not to blame
Define
1 Each nation has a right over its jurisdiction on an issue of such importance as abortion Giving each nation the freedom to approach the issue of legalization of abortion
2 However, all members of the world assembly must facilitate access to contraceptives and in case of rape, sexual abuse, or lack of income to raise the baby, encourage adoption programs to eliminate abortion that causes death. from the baby and sometimes from the mother

Sincerely :
The Helvetian Confederation

Approvals: 0

GenSec Status: LEGAL
Info

Not written in English, proposal basics, legislation in repeal, natsov

Also branding.

[Merni]

General Assembly Proposal
ID: b_h_a_r_a_t_1595837058
CRUISE VESSELS DISCHARGE ACT

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.

Category: Environmental

Industry Affected: Automotive

Proposed by: B H A R A T

The World Assembly,

Noting the importance of protecting the ocean environment;

Recognizing the efforts of prior resolutions enacted by the world assembly to save the ocean environment;

Concerned about the danger from discharges from cruise ships on ocean environment
, hereby:

SECTION 1

(a) Findings.—

(1) the natural beauty and health of the ocean and coastal environment is what draws passengers to travel along these waterways by ship;

(2) protecting the natural environment is beneficial to ocean environment;

(3) the number of cruise passengers continues to grow, making the cruise industry 1 of the fastest growing tourism sectors in the world;

(4) an average-sized cruise vessel generates millions of gallons of liquid waste and many tons of solid waste;

(5) those frequently untreated cruise ship discharges deliver nutrients, hazardous substances, pharmaceuticals, and human pathogens, including viruses and bacteria, directly into the marine environment;

(b) Purpose.—The purpose of this Act is to establish international standards and prohibitions for discharges from cruise vessels.

SECTION 2

(s) Cruise Vessel Discharges.—

(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:

(A) BILGE WATER.—

(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘bilge water’ means wastewater.

(ii) INCLUSIONS.—The term ‘bilge water’ includes lubrication oils, transmission oils, oil sludge or slops, fuel or oil sludge, used oil, used fuel or fuel filters, and oily waste.

(B) CRUISE VESSEL.—

(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘cruise vessel’ means a passenger vessel that—

(I) is authorized to carry at least 250 passengers;

(II) has onboard sleeping facilities forbpassengers.

SECTION 3:

(1) RESPONSIBILITIES OF PERSONS IN CHARGE OF CRUISE VESSELS.—The owner, operator, master, or other person in charge of a cruise vessel, shall at a minimum—

(I) conduct sampling or testing at the point of discharge on a monthly basis, or more frequently, as determined by the Administrator;

(II) provide real-time data to the Administrator, using telemetric or other similar technology, for reporting relating to

(a) discharges of sewage, graywater, and bilge water from cruise vessels;

(b) pollutants emitted in sewage, graywater, and bilge water from cruise vessels; and

(c) functioning of cruise vessel components relating to fuel consumption and control of air and water pollution;

(2) ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that technologies providing real-time data have the ability to record—

(a) the location and time of discharges from cruise vessels;

(b) the source, content, and volume of the discharges; and

(c) the operational state of components relating to pollution control technology at the time of the discharges, including whether the components are operating correctly;

(d) establish chains of custody, analysis protocols, and other specific information necessary to ensure that the sampling, testing, and records of that sampling and testing are reliable; and

(e) maintain, and provide on a monthly basis to the Administrator, electronic copies of required sampling .

SECTION 4:

INSPECTION PROGRAM.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall establish an inspection program to require that—

(i) regular announced and unannounced inspections be conducted of any relevant aspect of cruise vessel operations, equipment, or discharges, including sampling and testing of cruise vessel discharges;

(ii) inspections be carried out by the Environmental Protection Agency or the Coast Guard.

(B) COAST GUARD INSPECTIONS.—If the Administrator and the Commandant jointly agree that some or all inspections are to be carried out by the Coast Guard, the inspections shall—

(i) occur outside the Coast Guard matrix system for setting boarding priorities;

(ii) be conducted by specially-trained environmental inspectors.

SECTION 5:
(A) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Administrator shall—

(i) designate responsibility for conducting inspections;

(ii) require the owner, operator, master, or other person in charge of a cruise vessel to maintain and submit a logbook detailing the times, types, volumes, flow rates, origiwns, and specific locations of, and explanations for, any discharges from the cruise vessel .

(iii) provide for routine announced and unannounced inspections of—

(I) the functionality, sufficiency, redundancy, and proper operation and maintenance of equipment.

(B) RESPONSIBILITIES.—Cruise observers participating in the program shall—

(i) observe and inspect—

(I) onboard liquid and solid handling and processing systems;

(II) onboard environmental treatment systems;

(III) use of shore-based treatment and storage facilities;

(IV) discharges and discharge practices

Approvals: 0
GenSec Status: LEGAL
Info

Status: Lacking Support (requires 66 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 7 hours

Plagiarism from US law.

[Godular]

Repeal: “Access To Abortion”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#499

Proposed by: Helvecios

General Assembly Resolution #499 “Access to Abortion” (Category: Health; Area of Effect: Healthcare) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Dear WA or Del GenSec members / delegates
Beyond the right of any citizen to do what they want with their body, request to revoke this resolution because each nation has a right over its jurisdiction on an issue of such importance as abortion, considered that the resolution violates Natsov's rights to be fulfilled. by Member States to comply with a standard that is not considered an essential civil law
INDIGNANT : one of the key principles of the freedom of each nation is violated on how to approach the subject being a mockery of the right of natsov that each nation possesses and therefore a mockery of freedom and democracy since it is not a right essential civil
Define:
Natsov: when a nation has the right to govern its country however it wants
Essential Civil Law: Consider vital rights to live with dignity: public education, work, right to life, public health care, security, freedom, freedom of expression and non-discrimination

Hereby:
1 each nation is free to address the issue of decriminalization and / or legalization of abortion as they wish, giving the government of each country the freedom to decide on the issue as it is the basic principle of freedom, tolerance, and democracy and respect for the decisions of other nations

Yours sincerely:
The Confederation of Helvecios

Natsov only, Legislating in a repeal, Branding

Edited: And the guy removed it again... weeee

[Merni]

General Assembly Proposal
ID: tredovski_1595910926
The Tax of reformation

A resolution to enact uniform standards that protect workers, consumers, and the general public.

Category: Regulation

Area of Effect: Legal Reform

Proposed by: Tredovski

The World Assembly,

It has come to my attention that many countries have amorality issues. As you know, a domestic practice known as Economic Incentives are used to either stimulate or reform the Economy without intruding on capital rights. This practice has been used throughout the centuries to mold economic growth like clay. And the only errors that can be discovered may only be described as user error.

So today I come to you with a proposal. What if we were to propose a taxation on foreign trade, and redistribute the profit unequally to satisfy the human need.

In countries with morality issues, we could incentivize a tax cut on domestic trade or an increased stimulus in order to incentivize moral growth.

In more stubborn countries that are resisting the will of other sovereign nations, we could do something similar, incentivizing domestic funding in a Branch or Department or (Coincidently) economic incentives in to different industries. And even influence on a policy making level.

Now here are the numbers;

a.The tax rate would be 3.6% per ton of physical good's value.

b.Goods that are not taxed include, but are not limited to: Foreign Aid (In dire situations like a famine) , Military aid (In wartime Situations), and other goods sent with the Idea of humanitarian protection or aid.

c.Goods will be taxed at Int$ which is determined by the average price of the good in all countries adjusted for inflation. (So basically Purchasing Power Parity aka. GDP PPP)

d. the price will be adjusted for the receiver, Say a ton of Oranges cost 6,000,000 x(Currency Variable) in one country. But the if the other country paid the same price they would pay a quarter of its value. Then you would adjust it so the import would cost 24,000,000 y(Currency variable) In their country.

e. Tariffs do not apply first, this tax would be apply before the tariff adjusted the domestic price.

f. The tax is applied to the exporter, the importer shall not be taxed.

g. This could also help: drug trafficking through ports due to greater trading supervision, moral standard it our assembly, greater similarity in our nations, a thriving economy, and tighter immigration security due to more supervision at trading points, which are often border hot spots.

This is only the start, this bill will be the first in a long line that will improve international trade. I look forward to consulting my team on more bills that will only provide for our worlds economy.

(P.S it may look like I'm a small nation but I have ran multiple Successful nations before, this is just another)

Approvals: 1 (Iron Soviet)
GenSec Status: LEGAL
Info

Status: Lacking Support (requires 65 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 9 hours

Proposal basics (blogging), branding and metagaming at least.

[Graintfjall]

Why is it branding?

[The New Nordic Union]

Why is it branding?

"my attention", "I come to you", the postscriptum...

[Graintfjall]

Where did the idea that writing in the first person constitutes "branding" arise?

[The New Nordic Union]

Where did the idea that writing in the first person constitutes "branding" arise?

From the rules.

[Graintfjall]

And I'm saying, how did that arise? That line wasn't part of the redrafted rules post-Consortium. It's a recent addition*, presumably by either the mods, the Pink Power Rangers, or as a result of players asking for it (LOL, I kid - just the first two, then). Was there a discussion on it, and if so, where?

* Bearing in mind I haven't been active in quite a while, definitions of "recent" may vary.

[The New Nordic Union]

And I'm saying, how did that arise? That line wasn't part of the redrafted rules post-Consortium. It's a recent addition*, presumably by either the mods, the Pink Power Rangers, or as a result of players asking for it (LOL, I kid - just the first two, then). Was there a discussion on it, and if so, where?

* Bearing in mind I haven't been active in quite a while, definitions of "recent" may vary.

Not sure how the rule came about, there seems no evidence of any discussion (that has been preserved on these forums, anyway).

Earliest presence of the rule can be found in 2009, exemplified here.

[Graintfjall]

Huh, I even commented in that thread! Weird I didn't notice Ardchoille's clarification; I always wondered where that strange interpretation arose.

Shame it wasn't explicitly added to the rules till years later. As of 2016 the rule simply said:

Branding

Limited branding is allowed. "Limited" means that you may list your co-author by nation name only. Example:

"Co-authored by The Most Glorious Hack"

Further branding will result in the proposal being deleted. Don't list everyone who posted in the thread for your draft, don't list yourself, don't list your Minister Of Making Proposals, and don't post the 'pre-title' of the co-author (ie: "The Republic Of..."). This includes creating nations that have the same name as your region or group and using them to promote your region or group. It also includes using the name of a nation, region or group as an acrostic or acronym in a proposal. If you are using the [nation] tag to list your co-author make sure you are using the short version ([nation=short] or [nation=short+noflag]).

So explicitly adding the clarification must have come later.

[Grays Harbor]

It is branding. It has always been branding. Stop rules lawyering.

[Graintfjall]

Nope. As linked, the rule in 2016 made no mention of such, nor the 10 incredibly dreary pages of debate during the Consortium. All I'm asking is when the edit to the text was made - there may have been a discussion on it, but nothing in IA's rulings spreadsheet obviously connects to it so just wondering if any had a link so I could catch up (that's if there was a discussion).

[Grays Harbor]

viewtopic.php?f=9&t=159348

[Graintfjall]

Hmm, not getting through am I?

OK, with apologies to Yelda, I'll enlist the help of Brog Mammothhunter, one of Glog Firemaker's lesser cousins.

Brog look at scratches on cave wall.

Brog cannot count to 4 years but Brog count many moons. Brog notice scratches on cave wall different now!.

Brog ask: "Who make changes to scratches on cave wall? When make changes?"

[Grays Harbor]

Posted rules on the forum are what is enforced, not a draft thread in the archives.

[Mathuvan Union]

The Solar Cooker Project
A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.

Category: Environmental

Industry Affected: All Businesses - Strong

Proposed by: The Peacful Union of The world

We all have heard about global warming, and this is a way to reduce emitons, a one-year field test revealed that using a solar stove, an average family can save 30 litres of kerosene, 30 kg of LPG and about 1 tonne of firewood per year, which comes to an estimated 1 tonne of carbon dioxide reduction annually.

This startling statistic, when combined with the fact that we receive 10-15,000 times more solar energy on the Earth than we use, opens up amazing possibilities for the use of the sun's energy to meet out needs.

And here is why we should all use a solar cooker:

Today, fuel wood accounts for almost a fifth of the world's primary energy consumption. Each year about 2 billion tonnes of wood are burnt mainly for cooking purposes. Yet, today, we are facing a crisis with our fast diminishing forest cover and a fuel wood shortage for more than 2 billion people around the world.

Why Solar Cooking?
Apart from the obvious advantages of time and money saved, solar cooking produces no smoke, and thus no pollution. It does not release greenhouse gases like burning of other types of fuel does.

It cooks healthy food with minimal oil. It eliminates risks like fire and burns. Best of all, it uses a renewable energy source that can be freely harnessed by almost anyone using basic equipment.

It also has the potential to create a new industry with jobs for local communities.

A Simple Solar cooker
Is very simple to do a solar cooker,you can make a solar cooker quite easily at home or school. This one will work in any season as long as the sun is out.
A solar cooker is extremely easy to do, is cheap to do, and reduces emmitions

Proposals

Every nation in the WA should:
1 Only allow solar cookers to be sold.
2 all people in that nation must exchange their current stoves with solar cookers at no cost.

Approvals: 0

GenSec Status: LEGAL
Info
Status: Lacking Support (requires 66 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 11 hours

---

IRL references, not written in WA perspective

[Attempted Socialism]

The Solar Cooker Project
A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.

Category: Environmental

Industry Affected: All Businesses - Strong

Proposed by: The Peacful Union of The world

We all have heard about global warming, and this is a way to reduce emitons, a one-year field test revealed that using a solar stove, an average family can save 30 litres of kerosene, 30 kg of LPG and about 1 tonne of firewood per year, which comes to an estimated 1 tonne of carbon dioxide reduction annually.

This startling statistic, when combined with the fact that we receive 10-15,000 times more solar energy on the Earth than we use, opens up amazing possibilities for the use of the sun's energy to meet out needs.

And here is why we should all use a solar cooker:

Today, fuel wood accounts for almost a fifth of the world's primary energy consumption. Each year about 2 billion tonnes of wood are burnt mainly for cooking purposes. Yet, today, we are facing a crisis with our fast diminishing forest cover and a fuel wood shortage for more than 2 billion people around the world.

Why Solar Cooking?
Apart from the obvious advantages of time and money saved, solar cooking produces no smoke, and thus no pollution. It does not release greenhouse gases like burning of other types of fuel does.

It cooks healthy food with minimal oil. It eliminates risks like fire and burns. Best of all, it uses a renewable energy source that can be freely harnessed by almost anyone using basic equipment.

It also has the potential to create a new industry with jobs for local communities.

A Simple Solar cooker
Is very simple to do a solar cooker,you can make a solar cooker quite easily at home or school. This one will work in any season as long as the sun is out.
A solar cooker is extremely easy to do, is cheap to do, and reduces emmitions

Proposals

Every nation in the WA should:
1 Only allow solar cookers to be sold.
2 all people in that nation must exchange their current stoves with solar cookers at no cost.

Approvals: 0

GenSec Status: LEGAL
Info
Status: Lacking Support (requires 66 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 11 hours

---

IRL references, not written in WA perspective

It's also plagiarising, just for the trifecta.
https://wwf.panda.org/knowledge_hub/tea ... le_energy/

Renewable Energy: Make a Solar Cooker
A one-year field test in South Africa revealed that using a solar stove, an average family can save 30 litres of kerosene, 30 kg of LPG and about 1 tonne of firewood per year, which comes to an estimated 1 tonne of carbon dioxide reduction annually.
This startling statistic, when combined with the fact that we receive 10-15,000 times more solar energy on the Earth than we use, opens up amazing possibilities for the use of the sun's energy to meet out needs.

Today, fuel wood accounts for almost a fifth of the world's primary energy consumption. Each year about 2 billion tonnes of wood are burnt mainly for cooking purposes. Yet, today, we are facing a crisis with our fast diminishing forest cover and a fuel wood shortage for more than 2 billion people around the world.

Why Solar Cooking?
Apart from the obvious advantages of time and money saved, solar cooking produces no smoke, and thus no pollution. It does not release greenhouse gases like burning of other types of fuel does.

It cooks healthy food with minimal oil. It eliminates risks like fire and burns. Best of all, it uses a renewable energy source that can be freely harnessed by almost anyone using basic equipment.

It also has the potential to create a new industry with jobs for local communities.

A Simple Solar Oven
You can make a solar cooker quite easily at home or school. This one will work in any season as long as the sun is out.

[Mathuvan Union]

The Solar Cooker Project
A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.

Category: Environmental

Industry Affected: All Businesses - Strong

Proposed by: The Peacful Union of The world

We all have heard about global warming, and this is a way to reduce emitons, a one-year field test revealed that using a solar stove, an average family can save 30 litres of kerosene, 30 kg of LPG and about 1 tonne of firewood per year, which comes to an estimated 1 tonne of carbon dioxide reduction annually.

This startling statistic, when combined with the fact that we receive 10-15,000 times more solar energy on the Earth than we use, opens up amazing possibilities for the use of the sun's energy to meet out needs.

And here is why we should all use a solar cooker:

Today, fuel wood accounts for almost a fifth of the world's primary energy consumption. Each year about 2 billion tonnes of wood are burnt mainly for cooking purposes. Yet, today, we are facing a crisis with our fast diminishing forest cover and a fuel wood shortage for more than 2 billion people around the world.

Why Solar Cooking?
Apart from the obvious advantages of time and money saved, solar cooking produces no smoke, and thus no pollution. It does not release greenhouse gases like burning of other types of fuel does.

It cooks healthy food with minimal oil. It eliminates risks like fire and burns. Best of all, it uses a renewable energy source that can be freely harnessed by almost anyone using basic equipment.

It also has the potential to create a new industry with jobs for local communities.

A Simple Solar cooker
Is very simple to do a solar cooker,you can make a solar cooker quite easily at home or school. This one will work in any season as long as the sun is out.
A solar cooker is extremely easy to do, is cheap to do, and reduces emmitions

Proposals

Every nation in the WA should:
1 Only allow solar cookers to be sold.
2 all people in that nation must exchange their current stoves with solar cookers at no cost.

Approvals: 0

GenSec Status: LEGAL
Info
Status: Lacking Support (requires 66 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 11 hours

---

IRL references, not written in WA perspective

It's also plagiarising, just for the trifecta.
https://wwf.panda.org/knowledge_hub/tea ... le_energy/

Renewable Energy: Make a Solar Cooker
A one-year field test in South Africa revealed that using a solar stove, an average family can save 30 litres of kerosene, 30 kg of LPG and about 1 tonne of firewood per year, which comes to an estimated 1 tonne of carbon dioxide reduction annually.
This startling statistic, when combined with the fact that we receive 10-15,000 times more solar energy on the Earth than we use, opens up amazing possibilities for the use of the sun's energy to meet out needs.

Today, fuel wood accounts for almost a fifth of the world's primary energy consumption. Each year about 2 billion tonnes of wood are burnt mainly for cooking purposes. Yet, today, we are facing a crisis with our fast diminishing forest cover and a fuel wood shortage for more than 2 billion people around the world.

Why Solar Cooking?
Apart from the obvious advantages of time and money saved, solar cooking produces no smoke, and thus no pollution. It does not release greenhouse gases like burning of other types of fuel does.

It cooks healthy food with minimal oil. It eliminates risks like fire and burns. Best of all, it uses a renewable energy source that can be freely harnessed by almost anyone using basic equipment.

It also has the potential to create a new industry with jobs for local communities.

A Simple Solar Oven
You can make a solar cooker quite easily at home or school. This one will work in any season as long as the sun is out.

Wow quite blatant

[Mathuvan Union]

Carta De Derechos Civiles Y Humanos De WA

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Civil Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Helveticos
Asamblea Mundial:
Propongo una resolución que mejore y garantice los derechos civiles de los ciudadanos de las naciones miembros
reconociendo que algunas naciones han sido muy estrictas y tiranas respecto a lo que permiten y lo que no

Por la presente

World Assembly:
I propose a resolution that improves and guarantees the civil rights of citizens of member nations
recognizing that some nations have been very strict and tyrannical about what they allow and what they don't

Hereby

Art 1:
All citizens have the right to an identity what and that this identity is respected by others

Art 2:
All legal citizens have the right to public education, and to public health care without priority or criteria of social status, religion, culture, race, sex or sexual orientation.

Art 3:
member nations must allow freedom of expression and freedom of expression by allowing public protests, press freedom, that politicians of any ideology stand for election

Art 4: all citizens have the right to freedom of thought, freedom of religion and the right to privacy (Secret Vote, that their privacy is not violated in any way except that the judiciary of a nation so orders) and go out dressed as they want and when they want (except in cases such as quarantine)

Art 5: Judicially charged as well as convicted and suspected criminals have the right to a good defense and an impartial jury

Art 6: citizens have the right to live in a healthy environment and the obligation to take care of it

Art 7: citizens have the right to security and non-violence

Art 8: Older people have the right to retirement at an age (determined by the legislation of each nation) for their years of work

Art 9: workers have the right to protection against dismissal, to programs that protect them against labor exploration as well as the slave trade in any of its forms is illegal and the right to a minimum wage that is enough to cover their needs

Art 10: whistleblowers and witnesses have the right to a protection program regardless of whether their information is illegally obtained

Approvals: 0

GenSec Status: LEGAL
Info
Status: Lacking Support (requires 66 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 3 hours

---

Not in English, and reasonably sure it’s already covered in Right to a Fair Trial

[Merni]

General Assembly Proposal
ID: exchequer_1596410605

World Assembly Delegate Behavior Act
A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.

Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Exchequer
ARTICLE I - RECOGNITIONS
Section 1.
Resolved that the World Assembly recognizes the following:
(a) That in certain times issues may divide the thinking of the members and delegates of the World Assembly;
(b) That in such times the treatment of opposing nations may be lackluster;
(c) That despite these recognitions, the World Assembly does not intend to limit the free speech of member states;
(d) That, therefore, an act recommending to delegates that they use the upmost respect and behavior to other nations should be passed.

ARTICLE II - REGULATIONS
Section 1.
Delegates and members of and to the World Assembly are henceforth recommended to use all manners of courtesy when referring to other members and delegates, regardless of the political opinions of those members.

Section 2.
This resolution shall not be interpreted as requiring members to adhere to a specific code of decency or morality.

ARTICLE 3 - WORLD ASSEMBLY BEHAVIOR COMMITTEE
Section 1.
Hereby established is the "World Assembly Behavior Committee," to be referred to within this resolution as the "Committee."

Section 2.
The Committee shall have the capability to investigate nations for acts of misbehavior or courteousness and shall have the power to issue a report on the brazen act.

Section 3.
The Committee shall submit yearly, to the General Assembly, a report on the state of behavior amongst the Assembly.

Approvals: 3 (Exchequer, Tinhampton, Dorsla)

GenSec Status: LEGAL
Info
Status: Lacking Support (requires 62 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 2 days 21 hours

Metagaming (WA delegates)