Illegal GA Proposals 2nd edition

[New Min]

https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1534187147

ID: new_gerji_1534187147

Repeal: “On Abortion”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#128

Proposed by: New Gerji

General Assembly Resolution #128 “On Abortion” (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

GA Resolution #128 shall henceforth be rendered inactive, due to its insistence, in clauses 1a, 1b, and 7, that it be mandated upon WA member nations to allow the option of abortions in what are possibly unjustified situations that inappropriately take that which can potentially be considered a human life.
The Resolution further dictates in clause 7 that such life CANNOT be protected by law from actions that would perverse its rights (e.g: the seeking of abortions for reasons not addressed in clause 1 of the Resolution), and as such forces WA nations to condone what is possibly an evil.

Honest Mistake: member nations are not forced to accept abortion in other cases than listed in clause 1

[Grays Harbor]

Religious Exemption Act

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Conservative Christian American States

WA nations will be allowed to ignore WA laws that violate the religious belief of the nation.

That’s not how it works.

[Grays Harbor]

Remove The World Assembly!!

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.

Category: Political Stability

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Republic of Greenwood

The WA takes away the freedoms from it's member states!
The WA does not let nations rule themselves!
The WA forces nations to abide by passed laws even when it goes against a nation's beliefs!

Free The Nations And REMOVE THE WORLD ASSEMBLY!

Joke or serious? You decide. Either way illegal for game mechanics or something.

[Bears Armed]

Remove The World Assembly!!

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.

Category: Political Stability

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Republic of Greenwood

The WA takes away the freedoms from it's member states!
The WA does not let nations rule themselves!
The WA forces nations to abide by passed laws even when it goes against a nation's beliefs!

Free The Nations And REMOVE THE WORLD ASSEMBLY!

Joke or serious? You decide. Either way illegal for game mechanics or something.

Illegal for Game Mechanics, yes.
it's It's been Discarded.
Twice.

[New Min]

https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1534344088

ID: new_gerji_1534344088

Repeal: “On Abortion”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#128

Proposed by: New Gerji

General Assembly Resolution #128 “On Abortion” (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

GA Resolution #128 shall henceforth be rendered inactive, due to its insistence, in clauses 1a and 1b that it be mandated upon WA member nations to allow the option of abortions in what are possibly unjustified situations that inappropriately take that which can potentially be considered a human life.
The Resolution further dictates in clause 7 that there can never be attempts by the World Assembly, successful or not, to pass law that would protect such life throughout all the WA nations from abortions outside the scenarios detailed in clause 1. This halts any furthement in discussion to end what so many recognize to be the great evil still alive in our world, as well as any chance to perhaps restore civility in what should have been a civil land.

NatSov only(?)

[Grays Harbor]

Hunting License Requirement Act

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.

Category: Environmental

Industry Affected: Agriculture

Proposed by: Humilem

World Assembly,

Recognizing that many member states don't have suitable steps to attain a hunting license.

Concerned that unintelligent hunters are often ignorant in there choices to hunt a certain species causing cruel animal treatment, over population and more endangered species.

Noting that over population and increases in lists of endangered species.

Hereby, this act enlists of member nations to

I. Have each Hunting License Applicant take a test ensuring their knowledge of A. Animal Rights
B. Effects of Over-Population and endangered species on the environment
C. Endangered Species
D.Invasive Species

II. All Hunting License applicants must go on a hunting trip with an official park ranger, who will ensure they are knowledgeable hunters.

III. All Parks must have at least 20 park rangers to scan each visitor who has a weapons Hunting License.

Not quite sure how this is agriculture.

And while not an illegality, it is painfully naive and simplistic. Section III could even be interpreted as having 20 rangers for each visitor.

[New Min]

https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1534405193

Out Law Drugs
A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.

Category: Recreational Drug Use

Decision: Outlaw

Proposed by: Wi nation

We need to outlaw drugs they cause problems and don't help and then we can lower police budgets to help with health or etc.

Proposal basics, no operative clause, not written as a law, etc.

[New Min]

https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1534405520

ID: wi_nation_1534405520

A Better Education
A resolution to promote funding and the development of education and the arts.

Category: Education and Creativity

Area of Effect: Educational

Proposed by: Wi nation

We need to have more funding for education and for the kids who are our future and this will help us all

Proposal basics, no operative clause, not written as a law, etc.

[Bears Armed]

Hunting License Requirement Act

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.

Category: Environmental

Industry Affected: Agriculture

Proposed by: Humilem

World Assembly,

Recognizing that many member states don't have suitable steps to attain a hunting license.

Concerned that unintelligent hunters are often ignorant in there choices to hunt a certain species causing cruel animal treatment, over population and more endangered species.

Noting that over population and increases in lists of endangered species.

Hereby, this act enlists of member nations to

I. Have each Hunting License Applicant take a test ensuring their knowledge of A. Animal Rights
B. Effects of Over-Population and endangered species on the environment
C. Endangered Species
D.Invasive Species

II. All Hunting License applicants must go on a hunting trip with an official park ranger, who will ensure they are knowledgeable hunters.

III. All Parks must have at least 20 park rangers to scan each visitor who has a weapons Hunting License.

Not quite sure how this is agriculture.

Agreed.

And while not an illegality,

Contradicts GAR#267, clause #1, by over-riding member nations' own right to decide how they regulate hunting within their jurisdictions.

Section III could even be interpreted as having 20 rangers for each visitor.

That's how I read it... ^_^

[Bears Armed]

https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1534405193
https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1534405520

Proposal basics, no operative clause, not written as a law, etc.

Agreed.

[New Min]

https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1534457614

ID: north_tobago_1534457614

Legalising The Death Penalty

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: North Tobago
World Assembly,

Recognising that the recent repeal of GAR#375 "Crime and Punishment" in GAR#438 does indeed propose a ban on Capital Punishment or in other words, the death penalty

Concerned however, that a clause of this repeal does say "seeking therefore, to empower this assembly once again to ban morally problematic, unmerciful, and outdated practice of capital punishment.

Realising that the above quote in this piece of legislation that i quoted, GAR#438, infringes our National sovereignity rights; the rights of WA member states to pass our own laws and legislation in our own nations without international law influence.

Further acknowledging that repealing the death penalty causes alot of problems in WA member states' prisons. Criminals, who have commited the most
heinious of crimes e.g mass murder.

Further stating that citizen's Taxpayers money will be spent on keeping these certain criminals alive in these prisons, which will soon start to overflow with said criminals, which is also not a good effect on the economy.

Realising that the death penalty brings relief and justice to those who may have suffered from the crime that this criminal comitted.

Also acknowledging that the death penalty is not an 'outdated practice' as stated in GAR#438, as it is still very much legal in most WA member states, as it helps deal with crime in crime ridden places.

Saying that the death penalty is unmerciful is a huge contrast to the unmerciful killings of a mass murder who took away innocent lives for no reason at all.

This WA legislation hereby legalises capital punishment in all WA member states and protects our rights to pass our own laws or legislation regarding criminal punishment

branding ('our' in the last clause)

[Grays Harbor]

We Need To Save Health

A resolution to modify universal standards of healthcare.

Category: Health

Area of Effect: Healthcare

Proposed by: Eraver

We Need To Bring Back Health
On Saturday August 18 2018,The Health Freedom Begins

This makes no sense whatsoever

[Grays Harbor]

Offering Official Assistance To Occupied Regions

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Faondare

A proposal for the World Assembly to offer support, advice and assistance to any nation or region that requests it in the event of an invasion by hostile nations, or 'raiders'.

The authenticity of a request for assistance must be validated by the World Assembly, in order to prevent miscarriage of justice, whilst the appropriate degree of aid, and the form of aid, be it a direct military intervention or diplomatic, must be agreed upon by the Assembly, or other appropriate body.

The rights of hostile and aggressive 'raider' nations must be protected, to ensure that no breach of liberty is undertaken by any party.

Recognising
that a nation, or nations, may request assistance if their region is the target of a hostile occupation.

Understanding
that such a claim must be clarified and authenticated, and that foreign aid from the Assembly or independent bodies may not be suitable.

Providing
such help to a nation, nations, or region with an authenticated request to aid, to a degree that is seen fit by members of the Assembly, depending on the severity of the occupation and the final decision of the Assembly.

Allowing
the continued exercise of the rights of hostile nations, or 'raiders', whilst allowing neutral nations to proceed without undue concern.

Upholding
the rights and liberties of all nations and regions, regardless of the policies, attributes and characteristics of said party, and thus offering aid to all nations without bias.

Hereby proposimg the following procedure for the enactment of this policy:

- The World Assembly openly declares that any nation or region may request assistance in the liberation of their region from hostile occupation.
A request for aid must clarify the situation of the region at present, and elaborate as to what aid is required.

- The Assembly investigates the subject region, authenticating the claim for aid.
If the claim is found lacking, then it is dismissed. However, if sufficient evidence of hostile occupation is found, the Assembly will move to act.

- A region may be denied assistance if it is found to promote or otherwise encourage any activity found to be harmful to the international population. In such an event the Assembly should debate whether or not aid would be appropriate for this region.

- The Assembly will debate as to what assistance should be given to the region, and then confirm this with the requesting nation.

- The Assembly may now act to carry out assistance as seen fit.

- No official action to persecute individual hostile nations occupying a region will be taken by the World Assembly, but all occupied nations will be required to leave the region, or forcible action will be taken against them.

- The continued persecution of a hostile nation after it has left an occupied region by the Assembly is strictly forbidden. This is to be disregarded upon the event of any contradictory resolution being passed by the World Assembly.

The World Assembly will reserve the right to withdraw assistance at any time without notification. A request for aid does not mean or imply that aid will be given

Metagaming. Because the WA don’t give two spits for the raider/defender game.

[Grays Harbor]

Environmental Prot

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.

Category: Environmental

Industry Affected: Manufacturing

Proposed by: Northalabama

All nations must tax carbon emissions in order to discourage people to pollute

Nothing, and not much of nothing at that.

[Grays Harbor]

Legalize Slavery

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Dawn Kingdom

Every dictator and liberal has significant amount of human rights, but it doesn't mean that people should have enormous amount of power, in some states people have more influence than goverment itself. Why? Why should people have so much power that they will stop fearing goverment authorities. I think some laws should be enacted in memebers of WA, to help our goverment controling population to some extent. What is better proposal than legalizing slavery?
Now, before ignoring and declining my proposal, because it totally limits persons think about positive sides. Not whole population will be seized. Nations with low employment will have to worry about other things than that. Slaves shouldn't be tortured at all, slavers should keep them fed and under roof, housing all of them and offering protection. It is mutual benefits, poor population who cannot keep themselves, will work for goverment, and while they will improve industy, argiculture and etc. goverment will keep them safe. On goverment side, we will have free working force, just in price to feed them, which is part of our expenditure already, so why not seize the opportunity. Mutual benefits between goverment and the poor might look like as diminishing their rights, but actually it is just improving their life and ours too.

Blog. And how in the hell is this “human rights”?

Edit: contradiction, too

[Bananaistan]

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Dawn Kingdom

Every dictator and liberal has significant amount of human rights, but it doesn't mean that people should have enormous amount of power, in some states people have more influence than goverment itself. Why? Why should people have so much power that they will stop fearing goverment authorities. I think some laws should be enacted in memebers of WA, to help our goverment controling population to some extent. What is better proposal than legalizing slavery?
Now, before ignoring and declining my proposal, because it totally limits persons think about positive sides. Not whole population will be seized. Nations with low employment will have to worry about other things than that. Slaves shouldn't be tortured at all, slavers should keep them fed and under roof, housing all of them and offering protection. It is mutual benefits, poor population who cannot keep themselves, will work for goverment, and while they will improve industy, argiculture and etc. goverment will keep them safe. On goverment side, we will have free working force, just in price to feed them, which is part of our expenditure already, so why not seize the opportunity. Mutual benefits between goverment and the poor might look like as diminishing their rights, but actually it is just improving their life and ours too.

Blog. And how in the hell is this “human rights”?

Edit: contradiction, too

There's also operative clause and branding.

[Bears Armed]

Legalize Slavery

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Dawn Kingdom

Every dictator and liberal has significant amount of human rights, but it doesn't mean that people should have enormous amount of power, in some states people have more influence than goverment itself. Why? Why should people have so much power that they will stop fearing goverment authorities. I think some laws should be enacted in memebers of WA, to help our goverment controling population to some extent. What is better proposal than legalizing slavery?
Now, before ignoring and declining my proposal, because it totally limits persons think about positive sides. Not whole population will be seized. Nations with low employment will have to worry about other things than that. Slaves shouldn't be tortured at all, slavers should keep them fed and under roof, housing all of them and offering protection. It is mutual benefits, poor population who cannot keep themselves, will work for goverment, and while they will improve industy, argiculture and etc. goverment will keep them safe. On goverment side, we will have free working force, just in price to feed them, which is part of our expenditure already, so why not seize the opportunity. Mutual benefits between goverment and the poor might look like as diminishing their rights, but actually it is just improving their life and ours too.

Blog. And how in the hell is this “human rights”?

Edit: contradiction, too

Their next attempt:

Repeal: “Ban On Slavery And Trafficking”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal
Resolution: GA#23
Proposed by: Dawn Kingdom

General Assembly Resolution #23 “Ban on Slavery and Trafficking” (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The world assembly,
Every nation excepts the fact that trafficking is forced labour. It diminishes human rights to an extent, and makes individuals lives horrible. But, my friends we should look at other side. Good side that slavery will bring us.

Let see how trafficking can improve goverment position:

1.) As we know, unfortunately not every nation is economically strong. Goverment's money is spent on so many various expenditures (welfare, defense, police and etc.) that there is no more money to hire workers for the labour. In such case, no advancements will take place in nation, which will economically tear apart the nation itself.

2.) We all love the fact that our population is living happily. Giving them basic legalizations will make their life happy and voice stronger. But in some nations, people's voice is trying to totally shut down goverment. Every little action made by goverment is supervised by people. Why?! Why should they control everything. To balance their authority we, great leaders should cut their rights into quarters. This way leaders can have authority over their population.

3.) While many nations with help of police are trying to lower crime rate, it is not always that east as it sounds. We need other solutions. Slavery would be one of them. As slaves must listen to commands of their master, masters will force them not to act wildly and be careful of other human's lives. By allowing trafficking, crime rates, such as murder, robbery will go down.

These are one of the many benefits of slavery for the goverment. While it is common to think that people have no profits from being slave, I will prove you that you are wrong.

Here are some major benefits for humans to become slaves.

1.) While slavery diminishes individuals rights, in same time it increases their lifespan. How, you might ask! Not everyone is rich or capable in our glorious nations. Everyone has good deal of poor. Why not enslave them, by that we can feed them, house them, give them jobs and improve their lives.

2.) Slaves of course will have children. Offspring of two slaves will become slave in legal age, while children of slave and free human's will be free. How can we help children of two slaves?! It is east, master of those two slaves must guarantee kids full education, so when their time for job will come they will know how to do it right. Aside from education, kids will be granted almost full autonomy until age of consent. They will live with their parents, but they will play with their master's children. They will have profitable clothes and will be set healthy diet for them.

3.) When poor people will be enslaved, it might cause some dissent, but with time and good care, people will get used to it. At the end poor people are at wining side too. As free workforce, they will heroically lead advancement of the nation they live in. Agricultyre, industry, infrastructure, everything will thrive. Economics will go sky-rocketing, and people's life will be better, because new money can fund scientific researchers. Life will be much more happy then it was before.

4.) Of course, we shouldn't empower masters too much either. Slave trade will be illegal, and punishment will be discussed in the supreme court. As I said in previous paragraphs, slaves lives should be looked after. For bad treatment of slaves, masters will be punished according to the supreme court.

As we see, if we change some paragraphs from original slavery and grant slaves and their children fulfilled life. Remember that there are bunch more benefits for both goverment and the people, you just have to set strict laws about keeping slaves lives happy.

Thank you for your consideration,
sincerely Dawn Kingdom

Approvals: 0

GenSec Status: ILLEGAL — HELD
Info
Illegal (1): Bears Armed

8 minutes ago: Bears Armed: Illegal — Proposal Basics (Format: Proposals must be written as laws, not as lists of pros & cons); attempts at making new legislation (not just repealing old) in a Repeal; Branding (use of "I", and "Dawn Kingdom": Proposals must be written from the viewpoint of the WA as a whole).

[Essu Beti]

Repeal: “On Abortion”

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#128

Proposed by: New Gerji

General Assembly Resolution #128 “On Abortion” (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The 128th General Assembly Resolution shall henceforth be rendered inactive, due to its insistence, in clauses 1a and 1b, that it be mandated upon WA member nations to allow the option of abortions in what are possibly unjustified situations that inappropriately take that which can potentially be considered a human life.
Furthermore, the 7th clause of the Resolution dictates that the supposed right of nations to relax abortion laws as they wish shall be preserved. As such, this prohibits any attempt by the World Assembly, successful or not, to pass law protecting fetuses throughout the WA lands. This Resolution halts any advance in discussion on such a controversial topic, and must be repealed and reformed as the World Assembly democratically sees fit.

You can't partially repeal a proposal. Dunno why three of you thought this was legal with that great big problem stuck in here.

[Frisbeeteria]

You can't partially repeal a proposal. Dunno why three of you thought this was legal with that great big problem stuck in here.

I'm pretty sure the author was complaining about those three sections as a reason for repealing the whole thing. I'm not reading anything there about a partial repeal.

[Essu Beti]

It literally says that the 7th clause “shall be preserved.” That’s not complaining about it; it’s saying “keep this, throw away everything else.”

[Frisbeeteria]

It literally says that the 7th clause “shall be preserved.” That’s not complaining about it; it’s saying “keep this, throw away everything else.”

I stand corrected. I responded without researching the original, thinking it was a quote. You're right - that should make it illegal under the Amendment rule.

[Bananaistan]

I disagree. The argument is that the particular clause says that the right of nations to ... shall be preserved. It is not that the clause shall be preserved.

[Bears Armed]

I disagree. The argument is that the particular clause says that the right of nations to ... shall be preserved. It is not that the clause shall be preserved.

Opinion seconded.

[Grays Harbor]

Repeal: “Humanitarian Transport”

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#6

Proposed by: Blueflarst

General Assembly Resolution #6 “Humanitarian Transport” (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

ACKNOWLEDGING that this resolution dictate a nation how to care about war prisioners

CONCERNED that there is no international territory cause that territory do not belong to noone for that the point of making laws in it is useless

DEEPLY DISTURBED for the international intervention in war affairs saying how to manage prisioners and putting restrictions

OBSERVING that maintaining laws on no nation area is costly and do not guarantee the enforcement cause the large extension of oceans and seas

DECLARING that the nations do not have to ensure nothing to refugees for international order the refugee catcher is the only responsible

CONSIDERING this resolution entering in conflict with national affairs of nations in war

SAYING that is a form of international opression over minor nations

HEREBY REPEAL Humanitarian transport

Looks like a whole pile of NatSov

[Bears Armed]

Repeal: “Humanitarian Transport”

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#6

Proposed by: Blueflarst

General Assembly Resolution #6 “Humanitarian Transport” (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

ACKNOWLEDGING that this resolution dictate a nation how to care about war prisioners

CONCERNED that there is no international territory cause that territory do not belong to noone for that the point of making laws in it is useless

DEEPLY DISTURBED for the international intervention in war affairs saying how to manage prisioners and putting restrictions

OBSERVING that maintaining laws on no nation area is costly and do not guarantee the enforcement cause the large extension of oceans and seas

DECLARING that the nations do not have to ensure nothing to refugees for international order the refugee catcher is the only responsible

CONSIDERING this resolution entering in conflict with national affairs of nations in war

SAYING that is a form of international opression over minor nations

HEREBY REPEAL Humanitarian transport

Looks like a whole pile of NatSov

I'm tempted to declare it illegal under the 'Understandable English' rule...