Illegal GA Proposals 2nd edition

[Grays Harbor]

The Private National Mercantilism Act

A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.

Category: Free Trade

Strength: Mild

Proposed by: The Navian Islands

Recognizing that the stability of some free market economies lies in the hands of several large corporations, companies, and groups.

Feels that protecting this stability is a key goal in the prosperity of such economies.

The World Assembly hereby,

1. Encourages nations housing any national corporations to persuade said corporations to help contribute to the national economy

2. Notes that not all nations will accept such a resolution, and the resolution shall respectfully ignore said nations

3. Knowing that the market drives the corporations and the rise and fall of such a corporation is plausible

4. Also knowing that not all of the corporation will be under control of the respective government

5. Continues to have the World Assembly respect the economic status of many nations

6. Urges that a stronger economy may indirectly strengthen a nation's overall development

7. Points out that economic freedom is democratic right

8. Pushes for greater economic soundness, prosperity, equity, and overall gain

9. Grants nations the rights to strengthen their economy by allowing corporations to freely work and return a special fund for the nation's growth

10. Notes that it is encouraged for those economies who's citizens' lives correlate with the growth of the economy in general, and the raising of their overall development

11. Encourages nations to create some sort of national corporate tax

Not quite sure what this is trying to do. It seems to be a scattershot, all over the place.

[Grays Harbor]

Repeal The Ban On The Wa Military
A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.

Category: International Security

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Ravio

This ban was one of the stupidest laws ever made and it sickens me that it actualy passed bans on the military are the stupidest thing to do especialy when it limits good people and gives an advantage to the bad nations 'if the good guys are smaller, then the bad guys get stronger and they use that military to enslave good people just look at WW1, WW2, or the communist nations or any other event in history were the good guys slacked and lost horribly so to the better of every one and if only to create a message in one way or another that might actualy do some good for once!

Says it is a repeal. It is not repealing anything. It is bloggy. It is a rambling mess. It is chock full of RW references.

[Grays Harbor]

Reduction Of Military Budgets

A resolution to slash worldwide military spending.

Category: Global Disarmament

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Preblion

The General Assembly, noting the need for the destruction of weapons of mass destruction,
Fully alarming those not reducing their military budgets,
1. Recommends under the protection of emergency disaster relief and social order that every member state of the United Nations, that there be a decrease in individual national defense budgets;
2. Calls upon all countries to stop the development and use of nuclear weapons;
3. Urges all countries to publicize their military expenditures in order to promote the global reduction of military budget;
4. Encourages nations to spend money on education, health, food, shelter, and less on military;
5. Promotes NATO’s requirements of 2% reduction in military spending; a) Further supports an even greater reduction than 2%;
6. Sets a limit of how much money is allowed to be spent each year on the military;
7. Encourage countries to regularly report so that the UN knows how much money nations are spending on their military and the UN will suggest changes;
8. Encourages countries to agree on percentage of GDP to spend on military, which they should comply for three years;
9. Every country should make alliances and make people feel safe through reduction of arms; a) This can be done by selling arms in order to receive aid;
10. Creates a competition for reduction of military budgets in various nations;

With all the mentions of the UN and NATO, something is tripping my suspicion of plagiarism, in whole or part, for this.
If nothing else, illegal for RW references

[Grays Harbor]

The Petorian Principle
A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.

Category: Political Stability

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: The United States Of Petoria

Article I. The international hierarchy is to be decided by an individuals intelligence quotient (IQ). In society those of higher intelligence naturally have more responsibility because it falls upon them to solve the problems that cannot be solved by people of lower intelligence. Mentally inferior persons are to be terminated to undo decades of devolution among the human race.

Article II. Social class is to be based on intelligence, were the intelligent have more power and wealth and rule over the lower class.

Article III. Terminate all (genetically) deformed individuals. Termination of negative aspects of the human gene pool will rapidly reduce decades of devolution that have plagued mankind.

Article IV. The government is to be run by those of higher intelligence but is to be run for the good of the human race. Democracy is a disease. What good could be done when the intelligence of society is diluted by millions upon millions of idiots sharing their ideas that are ultimatly destined to doom them all. Forget happiness, existense is survival and only the intelligent know how to make choices that will preserve mankind. All political power is handed to the intelligent.

Article V. The Hierarchy: Level 1: IQ < 100 or suffered genetic deformity : These individuals are to be Euthanized.
Level 2: IQ > 100 : Lower Class. They work at entry level jobs for minimal pay and housing.
Level 3: IQ > 130 : The Elite. Are given executive roles in society such as CEOs or law enforcment / military.
Level 4: IQ > 170 : The monarchs. They rule the world and oversee anything and everything that goes on inside it. They make all political decisions.
Level 5: IQ > 200 : Surely anyone of this intelligence is divine, they are God. They are to be treated like a king and have a lush life with no responsibility.

Offensive, joke, ideological ban

International Vaccination
A resolution to modify universal standards of healthcare.

Category: Health

Area of Effect: Healthcare

Proposed by: The United States Of Petoria

Every year thousands of children die from preventable disease.

Article I. The governments of the world must increase their medical spending to provide vaccinations to all of their citizens at birth.

Article II. Vaccinating citizens will ensure that all people have a chance at a successful, fulfilling life free of preventable disease.

Article III. Vaccination works best when the majority of society is vaccinated. The more vaccinations given the faster the disease can be eliminated.

Global vaccinations will drastically improve the health among the global population, especially the poor, and will save millions of lives in the years to come.

Don't see where it does anything except say "Vax is Good"

[Grays Harbor]

Repeal: “Preventing Desertification”

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#432

Proposed by: Kihaku kishaku

General Assembly Resolution #432 “Preventing Desertification” (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: Agriculture) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The General Assembly,
While understanding the conservation efforts, I propose to repeal this act.
Some nations rely on their industry and the Preventing Desertification Act may damage those countries' economy.
Nations actually worried about desertification may uphold this act within their individual country, while other countries worry about other problems.
On my nations behalf, I ask that you all take this very seriously to help our economy as well as the economy of other nations.

Branding

[Grays Harbor]

Internet Access As A Human Right

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Bytestormia

The General Assembly,

OBSERVING The rise of technology and internet usage, and the rise of internet services,

OBSERVING The lack of technology and internet services in third world countries,

HEREBY STATES That Internet Access is a human right and should be provided by every country able to do so.

IMPLYING Free Internet access should be available regardless of location.

maybe it’s just me, but not seeing “significant “ here

[Grays Harbor]

Peaceful Voting Act

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.

Category: Political Stability

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Destructown

Recognizing that nations do not exist in a vacuum and that the instability of one nation can often lead to the spread of conflict to neighboring nations and the world as a whole.

Noting that no nation wants to be subject to turmoil coming from outside sources and asserting that as member nations to the WA, each nation has the responsibility to take actions to ensure their own political stability for the sake of the group.

Also noting that political instability has been shown to be at its highest in the month leading up to, and the month following a change of government.

HEREBY

1. Demands that all nations, in an effort to prevent instability during their most tumultuous months, supplement their nation's drinking supply as well as all bottled water sold within their borders, with opium for a month leading up to and a month following any change of government.

2. Defines a change of government as any instance where there is a change of 15% or more of the members to any branch of a nation's government.

3. Defines the proper level of opium supplementation as any amount that results in water that contains 2ML of opium per liter or greater.

5. Recognizing that there will be many unique challenges in implementing this program brought on by the variety of governments, infrastructure systems, religions, and cultures in the WA. It is hereby understood that each nation will be given the leeway to accomplish this in any manner that they see fit.

6. Allows for any member nation to impose restrictions above and beyond the ones laid out in this act.

7. Allows an exception to this policy for the drinking water provided to all current members of a nation's government

8. Allows for an an exception to the drinking water provided to all members of a nation's military, but only during a declared war.

9. Allows for an exception to the drinking water provided to any citizen under the age of 10 years.

This has got to be a joke, because it is ridiculous beyond belief. “I’ve got it! Let’s put highly addictive opioids in all drinking water!” said no sane person ever.

Is the author of this secretly the Joker?

[Attempted Socialism]

Internet Access As A Human Right

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Bytestormia

The General Assembly,

OBSERVING The rise of technology and internet usage, and the rise of internet services,

OBSERVING The lack of technology and internet services in third world countries,

HEREBY STATES That Internet Access is a human right and should be provided by every country able to do so.

IMPLYING Free Internet access should be available regardless of location.

maybe it’s just me, but not seeing “significant “ here

The "fixed" version https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1528580257 is meta gaming (Mentions fixing categories), and has no operative clause worth any strength. Simply stating a right is meaningless if a state is fully allowed to disregard said right. Implying is not operative either.

[Bananaistan]

Peaceful Voting Act

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.

Category: Political Stability

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Destructown

Recognizing that nations do not exist in a vacuum and that the instability of one nation can often lead to the spread of conflict to neighboring nations and the world as a whole.

Noting that no nation wants to be subject to turmoil coming from outside sources and asserting that as member nations to the WA, each nation has the responsibility to take actions to ensure their own political stability for the sake of the group.

Also noting that political instability has been shown to be at its highest in the month leading up to, and the month following a change of government.

HEREBY

1. Demands that all nations, in an effort to prevent instability during their most tumultuous months, supplement their nation's drinking supply as well as all bottled water sold within their borders, with opium for a month leading up to and a month following any change of government.

2. Defines a change of government as any instance where there is a change of 15% or more of the members to any branch of a nation's government.

3. Defines the proper level of opium supplementation as any amount that results in water that contains 2ML of opium per liter or greater.

5. Recognizing that there will be many unique challenges in implementing this program brought on by the variety of governments, infrastructure systems, religions, and cultures in the WA. It is hereby understood that each nation will be given the leeway to accomplish this in any manner that they see fit.

6. Allows for any member nation to impose restrictions above and beyond the ones laid out in this act.

7. Allows an exception to this policy for the drinking water provided to all current members of a nation's government

8. Allows for an an exception to the drinking water provided to all members of a nation's military, but only during a declared war.

9. Allows for an exception to the drinking water provided to any citizen under the age of 10 years.

This has got to be a joke, because it is ridiculous beyond belief. “I’ve got it! Let’s put highly addictive opioids in all drinking water!” said no sane person ever.

Is the author of this secretly the Joker?

There are times you'd miss the bloody stupid rule!

I dinged this for either being a joke proposal or if serious it contradicts GAR#107 Clean Water Act.

[Bears Armed]

I dinged this for either being a joke proposal or if serious it contradicts GAR#107 Clean Water Act.

It contradicts #299 'Legal Competence' too, because it tries to set a one-size-fits-all age threshold.

[Frisbeeteria]

Nationalisation of Casinos Act
A resolution to legalize or outlaw gambling.
Category: Gambling - Legalize/Outlaw: Legalize - Proposed by: Tectium

This resolution states that countries should create a State Funded Casino chain that ensures that all profits will go back into the pockets of its citizens
Therefore,
CLARIFYING that Gambling should be administered by the state
ENCOURAGES countries to set up state funded and owned casinos
FURTHER CLARIFIES that countries will use this money to better reform and expand social programs like health, education and transportation
CLEARLY STATES that all proceeds WILL and MUST go to the national budget.
URGES countries to buy out privately owned casinos and regulate gambling in the newly created national casinos
HEREBY states that Casinos must be a state sponsored industry

Not sure what rules this violates, but it's a clear example of why you should post a draft. There's a bit of a difference between all proceeds and all profits. I'm not sure how many people are going to line up at casinos knowing that 100% of the money they lay down will be lost to the government.

[Jebslund]

Nationalisation of Casinos Act
A resolution to legalize or outlaw gambling.
Category: Gambling - Legalize/Outlaw: Legalize - Proposed by: Tectium

This resolution states that countries should create a State Funded Casino chain that ensures that all profits will go back into the pockets of its citizens
Therefore,
CLARIFYING that Gambling should be administered by the state
ENCOURAGES countries to set up state funded and owned casinos
FURTHER CLARIFIES that countries will use this money to better reform and expand social programs like health, education and transportation
CLEARLY STATES that all proceeds WILL and MUST go to the national budget.
URGES countries to buy out privately owned casinos and regulate gambling in the newly created national casinos
HEREBY states that Casinos must be a state sponsored industry

Not sure what rules this violates, but it's a clear example of why you should post a draft. There's a bit of a difference between all proceeds and all profits. I'm not sure how many people are going to line up at casinos knowing that 100% of the money they lay down will be lost to the government.

I could see a (somewhat shaky) argument for attempting to meddle with internal finances in the Further Clarifies clause, and possibly meddling with tax rates in the one you highlighted "all proceeds" in (effectively saying gambling should be taxed at a rate of 100%), but I'm not seeing any other violations, and both of those are contradictions.

Possibly formatting in that it starts out as a recommendation then becomes a mandate? that's a very fragile argument, though.

[Bears Armed]

Not sure what rules this violates, but it's a clear example of why you should post a draft. There's a bit of a difference between all proceeds and all profits. I'm not sure how many people are going to line up at casinos knowing that 100% of the money they lay down will be lost to the government.

I could see a (somewhat shaky) argument for attempting to meddle with internal finances in the Further Clarifies clause, and possibly meddling with tax rates in the one you highlighted "all proceeds" in (effectively saying gambling should be taxed at a rate of 100%), but I'm not seeing any other violations, and both of those are contradictions.

Possibly formatting in that it starts out as a recommendation then becomes a mandate? that's a very fragile argument, though.

My opinion: "Illegal — "Should"/"Encourages"/"Urges" don't DO enough for 'Legalize'."

[Grays Harbor]

Father's Rights After Divorce

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Cappedore

The World Assembly,

Noting that Fathers, after divorce, are not permitted to see their children for a long period of time, after custody is fully taken in by the mother,

Acknowledging that Fathers are to spend half time with their children, with their mother earning the other half,

Implying that children should have the right to see each parent on a stable and steady timetable,

Hereby,

Gives Fathers the privilege of seeing their children/child on a half-a-year basis,

Allows children alike to see each parent on a half-a-year basis,

Permits Mothers/Fathers to see their children every other holiday each year.

Not seeing how this is significant strength.

There is also very much wrong with this particular “one size fits all” approach. One example, an abusive parent ...

[Grays Harbor]

Preventing Communism

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: United States of Nikosa

The General Assembly,

Shocked at the number of states that use Communism as their form of government.

Communism is hereby defined as the banning of private property and the use of a state-planned economy

Noting that these governments use mass repression to prevent rebellion and enforce labor including but not limited to:

a) the withholding of information such as books or internet

b) the use of brutal torture in order to get information out of people

c) the mass surveillance of people, invading their privacy

d) the use of military force in order to control any form of protest

Understanding that a major cause of Communism is mass poverty, but stating that Communism does not alleviate this.

Hereby,

1. Mandates that all nations give all humans their human rights.

2. Asks nations to give their citizenry the right to vote (though this may not be necessary).

3. Basic Human Rights are hereby stated to be:

a) All human beings are born free and equal in their rights.

b) These rights shall not be infringed due to race, sex, color, language, opinions, religion, property ownership, social order, or religion.

c) Everyone has the right to life, liberty, property, and security.

d) Slavery or involuntary servitude is prohibited unless in case of punishment for a crime.

e) No individual shall be subject to torture, or cruel/unusual punishment.

f) All people are recognized as people and equals under the law.

g) No one shall be arrested without reason.

h) Everyone has the right to privacy before the law unless a search warrant is gotten by law enforcement.

i) All people accused of a crime are innocent until proven guilty before the law.

j) All people have a right to freedom of movement within a state. The right of a person to leave a state cannot be infringed.

k) All people have the right to seek asylum within another country. However, the country has the right to deny this.

l) All people have the right to information without government control.

Ideological ban, and duplication. Sooooooo much duplication.

[Grays Harbor]

Improving Equality

A resolution to reduce income inequality and increase basic welfare.

Category: Social Justice

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Marxist Germany

Seeing how the world has been descending into Comlete capitalism and Social injustice i propose this resolution to reduce wealth gaps and increase income equality and increase social justice and welfare.

This resolution if passed by the general assembly will help the poor people who are suffering and starving while reducing the wealth of the rich who do not need more money than they alreay have.

If this act is passed the Socialist and Communist nations will benefit from thius and countries who are working towards a perfect income equality and a good social welfare spending, while total dictatorships run by corporates aiming to make the rich richer and the poor poorer will not benefit and will be harmed.

So let's aim to make this world a better place to live in for everyone!
Greetings, Marxist Germany

Does nothing, bloggy, possible ideological ban.

Edit: branding, too

[Jebslund]

An international trade embargo on ice Cream

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.


Category: Political Stability

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Bleuu


To protect our citizens and the global community from the Violent Murders and Shark Attacks that have been significantly linked to Ice Cream by the renowned scientists of World Assembly member states.

I. A temporary but exhaustive embargo on Ice Cream and related products, to include Ice Cream Cones, Ice Cream Scoopers, Small Wooden Spoons, and Sprinkles.
II. Reactivate tarrifs to be placed on all imports and exports of any Nation found to be in violation of this Resolution.
III. The allocation of $15 million from the World Assembly to the International Health Institute of Bleuu, Inc. towards research aimed at discovering the root cause of these horrendous deaths and to implement policies and protective measures to combat further loss of life.

PLEASE tell me this Joke Proposal...

[Jebslund]

Unified Endangered Species List Creation

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.


Category: Environmental

Industry Affected: All Businesses - Mild

Proposed by: Talitoa


The World Assembly

Be-living that a Endangered Species List would give nations a list of endangered animals that would help point out and categorize endangered species in the first place

Also that the list could help other nations without having to deal with other nations endangered lists. Therefore giving a unified list everyone can use.

Noting that bad or horribly structured lists can cause more animals to be miscategorized or left out in the long run.

Also Noting the bright people we have in the WA to help create the list. Not to mention all the other nations that can help out

Be-living that more endangered or critical species can be saved by better storage and categorization methods...

Hereby creates a short term committee to create a Unified Endangered Species List.

Committee-Only, No Operative Clause, Basic English. A thread has since been created.

[Grays Harbor]

A Ban On The Use Of Outer Space For Hostile Purposes
A resolution to slash worldwide military spending.

Category: Global Disarmament

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Wutu

Recognising that in recent times some nations have sought to develop weapons systems meant to either be used in outer space against the military forces of other nations, or are intended to discharge projectiles directly from space to the territory of other member states for none peaceful purposes we believe it to be in the best interest of humanity to prevent these practises from continuing.

• The term "outer space" is defined as the environment beyond the earth’s atmosphere. Anything above the thermosphere e for the purposes of this resolution is defined as “outer shape”. Based on the opinions of scientists this means that anything above 600 km from the earth’s surface is deemed as “outer space”
• “Projectile weapon” means anything designed to fire from a gun or any other firing device.
• “Offensive purposes” means meant to either end human life (or shorten the life span) or intended to do significant to harm so that a person’s quality of life is signifantly damaged on a permanent basis.
• Only citizens with the express permission of nations governments must travel beyond the exosphere (This is assumed to be beyond 6,200 miles above the earth).

This resolution seeks to ban states from conducting military operations against another state by using weapons soley meant to be used in space against another nations forces that are also based in outer space.

Conditions that nations agree to adhere to:
1.) No craft or satellite based in , or passing through outer space must have the capability of firing projectile weapons.
2.) Nations will not produce weapons systems intended for destruction of surveillance systems based in outer space belonging to other nations.
3.) No satellite based in outer space must discharge a projectile at earth for lethal purposes, (including but not limited to missiles or laser beams).
4.) Nations agree that citizens travelling in outer space will not carry any device either on their person or on the craft they are travelling that is likely to be used for lethal purposes.
5.) Nations will seek to ensure they take measures meaning citizens cannot travel beyond the exosphere without the express permission of their national governments permission (beyond 6,200 miles above the earth’s atmosphere) where they have the intention of subjecting others to lethal harm ( In practice this will mean a" license" must be granted t oprate above the exosphere by a body setup by the state.)

NS =/= Earth, so RL reference I believe.

[Grays Harbor]

The Defense Act

A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.

Category: International Security

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Conservitve systems

This bill will create three positions The minister of war and the minister of defense and the spy ministry the roles of the War and Defense ministries will be to both lead and prevent invasions, and raids, (which could be a precurser to war).
This act will also make it that if a region is invaded and the minister of war becomes it's leader that region and all the nations with it, will become part of the ministers region.
These "conquest" can only be preformed on nations that are either older then 6 months, have over 100 nations, and it's own military leader.
The spy minister will be able to create a fake randomly generated nations to spy on other nations to alert there region of possible invasion.
Now of coarse this will require some coding to be done and this won't be able to be done imediatly but this would be a great addition to nationstates.

Game mechanics

[Bears Armed]

A Ban On The Use Of Outer Space For Hostile Purposes
A resolution to slash worldwide military spending.

Category: Global Disarmament

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Wutu

Recognising that in recent times some nations have sought to develop weapons systems meant to either be used in outer space against the military forces of other nations, or are intended to discharge projectiles directly from space to the territory of other member states for none peaceful purposes we believe it to be in the best interest of humanity to prevent these practises from continuing.

• The term "outer space" is defined as the environment beyond the earth’s atmosphere. Anything above the thermosphere e for the purposes of this resolution is defined as “outer shape”. Based on the opinions of scientists this means that anything above 600 km from the earth’s surface is deemed as “outer space”
• “Projectile weapon” means anything designed to fire from a gun or any other firing device.
• “Offensive purposes” means meant to either end human life (or shorten the life span) or intended to do significant to harm so that a person’s quality of life is signifantly damaged on a permanent basis.
• Only citizens with the express permission of nations governments must travel beyond the exosphere (This is assumed to be beyond 6,200 miles above the earth).

This resolution seeks to ban states from conducting military operations against another state by using weapons soley meant to be used in space against another nations forces that are also based in outer space.

Conditions that nations agree to adhere to:
1.) No craft or satellite based in , or passing through outer space must have the capability of firing projectile weapons.
2.) Nations will not produce weapons systems intended for destruction of surveillance systems based in outer space belonging to other nations.
3.) No satellite based in outer space must discharge a projectile at earth for lethal purposes, (including but not limited to missiles or laser beams).
4.) Nations agree that citizens travelling in outer space will not carry any device either on their person or on the craft they are travelling that is likely to be used for lethal purposes.
5.) Nations will seek to ensure they take measures meaning citizens cannot travel beyond the exosphere without the express permission of their national governments permission (beyond 6,200 miles above the earth’s atmosphere) where they have the intention of subjecting others to lethal harm ( In practice this will mean a" license" must be granted t oprate above the exosphere by a body setup by the state.)

NS =/= Earth, so RL reference I believe.

Yes.

[Grays Harbor]

Banning Funding Of Ngos And New Immigration Bill

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Reectopia

NGO stands for non government organization these so called organisations are carrying over thousands of unskilled workers flooding us with migrants from various countries such facts like
a. these are ILLEGAL people and should be sent back
b. not telling governments where they got their funding

these NGOs are flooding our proud land with thousands of people actions that should be taken are
a. army or MP or police officers should be on board searching for wanted criminals or illegal activity on board NGO vessels
b. the ships carrying migrants should be sunk and the traffickers arrested
c. many migrants are doctors or skilled but they should provide VISA to show they are skilled and may be let in if the country they are taken by allows it

Does “our proud land” count as branding?
Pretty sure 5hey have no real clue what an actual NGO is either.

[Bears Armed Mission]

Banning Funding Of Ngos And New Immigration Bill

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Reectopia

NGO stands for non government organization these so called organisations are carrying over thousands of unskilled workers flooding us with migrants from various countries such facts like
a. these are ILLEGAL people and should be sent back
b. not telling governments where they got their funding

these NGOs are flooding our proud land with thousands of people actions that should be taken are
a. army or MP or police officers should be on board searching for wanted criminals or illegal activity on board NGO vessels
b. the ships carrying migrants should be sunk and the traffickers arrested
c. many migrants are doctors or skilled but they should provide VISA to show they are skilled and may be let in if the country they are taken by allows it

Does “our proud land” count as branding?
Pretty sure 5hey have no real clue what an actual NGO is either.

Pretty sure that that's not 'Human Rights', either...

[Gaine Moon]

A resolution to slash worldwide military spending.

Category: Global Disarmament

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Friedshafen

The purpose of this proposal is to categorize the rules and types of neutrality for a nation and group of nations.

Article 1: Neutrality Rules for a Nation and Neutrality Rules for a Group of Nations

Section 1: Neutrality Rules for a Nation are rules that only a one nation has to follow.

Section 2: Neutrality Rules for a group of nation are rules that all Nations that are citizens of a Neutral group of nations must obey by. How a group of nations becomes neutral is there the group of nations own body of elected or appointed officials or if the world community finds it necessary to force neutrality on a nation or group of nations they can.

Article 2 : The State of Total Neutrality

Section 1: A nation or group of nations under The State of Total Neutrality is to have know standing army and shall not participate in any acts of war or conflicts.

Section 2: If a nation or group of nations under The State of Total Neutrality is under acttak then the nation has the right to raise a army and defend its self or relie on help from another nation or region.

Article 3: State of Neutrality with Arms

Section 1: A nation or group of nations witch is neutral but wishes to hold an army shall fall under this category.

Section 2: A nation under State of Neutrality with Arms shall have an army that dose no more then 100,000 active duty soldiers.

Section 3: A group of nations under State of Neutrality with Arms shall have a standing army no more then 10,000 active duty soldiers per member of the group of nations.

Article 4: Neutrality for a Moment

Section 1: a nation or group of nations can clam Neutrality if a war between two nations or regions is immanent and can only stay to that clam as long as the nation or group of nations army dose not make any war like actions to a nation or group of nations during that time.

Riddled with typos, and game mechanics.

[Bears Armed]

A resolution to slash worldwide military spending.

Category: Global Disarmament

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Friedshafen

The purpose of this proposal is to categorize the rules and types of neutrality for a nation and group of nations.

Article 1: Neutrality Rules for a Nation and Neutrality Rules for a Group of Nations

Section 1: Neutrality Rules for a Nation are rules that only a one nation has to follow.

Section 2: Neutrality Rules for a group of nation are rules that all Nations that are citizens of a Neutral group of nations must obey by. How a group of nations becomes neutral is there the group of nations own body of elected or appointed officials or if the world community finds it necessary to force neutrality on a nation or group of nations they can.

Article 2 : The State of Total Neutrality

Section 1: A nation or group of nations under The State of Total Neutrality is to have know standing army and shall not participate in any acts of war or conflicts.

Section 2: If a nation or group of nations under The State of Total Neutrality is under acttak then the nation has the right to raise a army and defend its self or relie on help from another nation or region.

Article 3: State of Neutrality with Arms

Section 1: A nation or group of nations witch is neutral but wishes to hold an army shall fall under this category.

Section 2: A nation under State of Neutrality with Arms shall have an army that dose no more then 100,000 active duty soldiers.

Section 3: A group of nations under State of Neutrality with Arms shall have a standing army no more then 10,000 active duty soldiers per member of the group of nations.

Article 4: Neutrality for a Moment

Section 1: a nation or group of nations can clam Neutrality if a war between two nations or regions is immanent and can only stay to that clam as long as the nation or group of nations army dose not make any war like actions to a nation or group of nations during that time.

Riddled with typos, and game mechanics.

I don't see game mechanics, offpaw, but I do see Meta-gaming (in the mention of regions). Also, see GA Resolution #255.