Advertisement
by Gnejs » Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:10 am
by States of Glory WA Office » Sun Sep 25, 2016 4:24 pm
by Gnejs » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:52 am
by Tinfect » Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:27 am
Gnejs wrote:MANDATES that all network owners/operators in WA member states refrain from adding surcharges for non-domestic users from other member states connecting to their network for the first 120 minutes of calling and 1 megabytes of data;
Imperium Central News Network: EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL CITIZENS ARE TO PROCEED TO EVACUATION SITES IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL FURTHER SUBSPACE SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS ARE TO BE DISABLED IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: THE FOLLOWING SYSTEMS ARE ACCESS PROHIBITED BY STANDARD/BLACKOUT [Error: Format Unrecognized] | Indomitable Bastard #283
by Gnejs » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:21 am
by Wallenburg » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:31 am
by Tinfect » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:43 am
Gnejs wrote:OOC: So noted. Any suggestions on how it could be jacked-up to a worthwhile-yet-reasonable level? Also, while these sort of comments are sorely appreciated - I don't really know much about this stuff - I kindly ask they be put forward IC. It makes it easier for my characters to respond, and it's more fun.
Imperium Central News Network: EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL CITIZENS ARE TO PROCEED TO EVACUATION SITES IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL FURTHER SUBSPACE SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS ARE TO BE DISABLED IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: THE FOLLOWING SYSTEMS ARE ACCESS PROHIBITED BY STANDARD/BLACKOUT [Error: Format Unrecognized] | Indomitable Bastard #283
by Gnejs » Mon Sep 26, 2016 5:05 am
Wallenburg wrote:"I still have no idea what this proposal is on about. Since when were telegraph lines measured in minutes, and what on earth is a m-'megabyte'?"
Tinfect wrote:OOC:
I won't pretend to have flawless knowledge on the subject of data usage either, on the field of Megabytes, however, 100 should be closer to enough to keep Bank Accounts in order and such things. The average for such things here in the 'States is always going up, and the most recent numbers I can find still put it vastly above that number, so, it shouldn't mean that people can just hop over national borders to steal some Data, but shouldn't put too much hurt on them as long as they don't throw it around pointlessly. From an MT perspective it should be fine.
As for why this is OOC, it's because doing it IC, being FT and all that, would turn it from 100 Megabytes to 100 Terrabytes. At some point, Storage/Processing Capacity outstrips the need for silly things like Data Compression. And it probably doesn't help that streaming information over Interstellar Distances distances is straight up impossible for the Imperium, so, lacking a local clone of the Archive, or an Imperial Relay, it'd have to send as much information as possible, all at once.
by The Greater Siriusian Domain » Mon Sep 26, 2016 6:15 am
by Wallenburg » Mon Sep 26, 2016 10:24 am
Gnejs wrote:"Welcome! I can understand how this all seems rather confusing. Long story short, in my country we have electronic devices that lets you speak to other persons - and even send them images and browse giant invisible networks of information - with a similar device. Some of them are mobile as well and let's you walk around when you do it.
What's more, a lot of member states actually share this technology and have compatible infrastructure that allows you to continue doing all these things seamlessly while crossing borders.
Now, I see how this probably won't apply to a nation such as yours, and undoubtedly many others with a similar level of technological advancement, so this might not be very relevant for you. You'd have to comply, of course, should this one day pass, but I've phrased the operative clause so that it says that a nation's telecommunications companies must refrain from adding any surcharges to users when they connect to their network. Compliance for nations such as your own would thereby mean that if and when you attain this sort of technology, then you'd have to instruct your companies to not add any surcharges when users from other member states connect to their networks.
Much like that resolution about handling space debris; we don't have a space program and we'll likely never get one, we're afraid of space and would rather stay well away from it. If we, one day, however, started launching stuff into space, we'd make sure to do it in line with that resolution. So, we're in compliance with it. I hope so, at least, because that's what I reported back home when they asked me if we needed to start a space program.
Feel free to help yourself to tacos, they're good."
by Imperium Anglorum » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:46 pm
Gnejs wrote:Feel free to help yourself to tacos, they're good."
by States of Glory WA Office » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:29 pm
Gnejs wrote:"Any chance of you fellows looking through Wilma's proposal while you're here? And again, I'm sorry about the alarm."
by Gnejs » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:16 pm
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Parsons: TAEH-KEHS or TAH-KOHS?
Wallenburg wrote:"Yes, but you seem to misunderstand the definition of 'network'. Networks are not exclusively defined as these fantastical communications platforms. Telephone lines are networks. Telegraph lines are networks. Railroads are networks. Sewage systems are networks. The current phrasing of the proposal would apply these requirements to those networks, which makes no sense.»
Wallenburg wrote:"I do not object to legislation on technology beyond Wallenburg's development, but to legislation that seems to assume that such technology is developed in all member nations."
States of Glory WA Office wrote:Fairburn: Forget it. Intentionally or not, I've been deceived and made into a fool. Besides, I cannot understand the text of this proposal at all. What's wrong with a good old Morse code machine? I'm out. (exits)
Neville: Unlike my colleague, I do happen to possess a mobile phone. However, even I'm a little confused as to what this actually does. Also, I hate nachos. They're the work of a demon, I tell you.
The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:Teran Saber: "In the Greater Siriusian Domain, we find your conventional cell phone technology to be obsolete. This proposal essentially does nothing within the Confederacy."
by Caral » Wed Sep 28, 2016 2:05 pm
by States of Glory WA Office » Wed Sep 28, 2016 3:46 pm
Gnejs wrote:«Huh, what? Oh, eh, which ever one you prefer Your Dukeness.»
Gnejs wrote:«Modern tech? Modern tech?! How does this paradox of a house not implode on a daily basis? How am I supposed to cater to cave-dwellers and star lords simultaneously? Past and future? We’re right here, right now, aren’t we?»
by The Greater Siriusian Domain » Wed Sep 28, 2016 6:56 pm
Gnejs wrote:The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:Teran Saber: "In the Greater Siriusian Domain, we find your conventional cell phone technology to be obsolete. This proposal essentially does nothing within the Confederacy."
Wilma looks terrified.
- «Thistle, is that a star lord?»
Thistle looks through a glossy folder detailing various delegations.
- «Eh, yes, in the sense that he represents a state which consists of many planets and travel by space ship etc., sure. Remember, be nice, and roll with it.»
- «Yes, yes, picture me rollin.»
She faces Teran
- «Greetings, Star Lord. We will look at amending our proposal, although I’m not sure it’ll ever be able to cover civilizations such as yours. Please, accept this churro as a token of friendship.»
She looks at Thistle
- «How did I roll?»
- «Meh, could’ve been worse.
by Gnejs » Thu Sep 29, 2016 1:32 pm
*Ambassador Teran Saber sighs*
"One suggestion would be to use somewhat more broad terms that are descriptive of function when referring to communications devices. For example, instead of 'cellular phone', try 'networked wireless communications device'. Oh, and thanks for the gift, but you can keep it. As a general rule we prefer continued positive relations as a token of friendship over material goods."
by States of Glory WA Office » Thu Sep 29, 2016 2:46 pm
Gnejs wrote:Speaking of words, "cellular phone" is not a part of the proposal, but rather "mobile phone device". While I agree this does have a certain ring - hehe -
by Gnejs » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:33 am
by Jarish Inyo » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:35 am
by Calladan » Fri Sep 30, 2016 12:40 pm
Jarish Inyo wrote:So, companies are punished because of the stupidity of a few tourist? How is it the companies at fault? And what about people that use hotel phones to make long distance calls? Should the hotel have to eat the cost of those calls too? And how do you propose that the WA enforce this this punishment?
by Jarish Inyo » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:08 pm
Calladan wrote:Jarish Inyo wrote:So, companies are punished because of the stupidity of a few tourist? How is it the companies at fault? And what about people that use hotel phones to make long distance calls? Should the hotel have to eat the cost of those calls too? And how do you propose that the WA enforce this this punishment?
I might be misreading the current act, but I can not see anything about punishment in it - at least not in the active part of the proposal (at the end).
All it does it ask the operators to stop gouging people for two hours of a call just because they aren't connecting to a domestic provider, which doesn't seem unreasonable, and to inform anyone connecting to their network of what the charges will be when they connect (so that users get a fair idea of what they are paying) which again - not unreasonable.
by Separatist Peoples » Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:03 pm
Jarish Inyo wrote:
It is punishing a company for the stupidity of non customers. One knows that when using a their device outside of their coverage area, they are going to be charged more. And people have to enter an international prefix to make the call. So why should the company be forced to give free time to non customers? Why should they be forced to shoulder the cost of of those calls?
by Jarish Inyo » Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:23 pm
How should anybody know when they have moved into a competitor's area of coverage?
Why should a person be charged for a transaction they did not agree with?
Your entire argument takes the basic precepts of contractual transactions and throws it entirely out the window,
If they use that service, they should be charged, but for merely moving lawfully within their borders, they have assented to no exchange.
by States of Glory WA Office » Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:52 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement