Category; Strength = Global Disarmament; Mild
The "meat" of the proposal is the Recommends clause, which actually does something to WA member nations (encourages them to make peaceful relations with non-members). That would presumably have a small disarming effect by discouraging wars and the associated military spending. I don't see anything this duplicates but I am more concerned that the last clause as written may contradict GAR #2, which states "Whilst WA Member States may engage in wars, the World Assembly as a body maintains neutrality in matters of civil and international strife. As such, the WA will not engage in commanding, organising, ratifying, denouncing, or otherwise participating in armed conflicts, police actions, or military activities under the WA banner"
Currently, the last clause seems to contradict that by suggesting the WA may support military activities against non-member nations if there has been "confirmation of a real and significant threat and attempts at diplomatic resolutions of conflict."
I'd like to hear other's take on this, though, as I might be excessively rules-lawyering...