WA Topic: Universal Vegetarianism

[Bordav]

I am wishing to propose a law in the WA that would be beneficial to our nation's health and improve the rights of animals. I wish to create a law that would make nations required to be vegetarian. Now this is a very radical move and I would like your support very much. And also if you are not a WA member please stay out of this thread. Ask me questions about this and I will answer via this forum or telegram. Much regards, Bordav

[Frisbeeteria]

Wrong forum. Moved, General GA

[Bordav]

Wrong forum. Moved, General GA

Ah thank you my friend. Namaste!

[The Fair Republic]

I think that this is an overstep of the W.A's powers. Thus I won't support the bill

[Grays Harbor]

I am wishing to propose a law in the WA that would be beneficial to our nation's health and improve the rights of animals. I wish to create a law that would make nations required to be vegetarian. Now this is a very radical move and I would like your support very much. And also if you are not a WA member please stay out of this thread. Ask me questions about this and I will answer via this forum or telegram. Much regards, Bordav

Not happening. Seriously. Not. Ever.

[Nouvelle o France]

Not happening. Seriously. Not. Ever.

I would like to add that several species who are members of this assembly are strictly carnivorous with some considering Nonsense Legislator as a Gourmet Meal.
I for one will fight this law with every last fiber of my being.

[Wallenburg]

"Wallenburgians like meat. Most people like meat. Carnivores would die if they couldn't eat meat. Out of concern for the health of our people and carnivorous sapients, we can never support this."

[Novsvacro]

"But what will we do with the flesh of the slaughtered bourgeoisie?"

[Nickel Empire]

Are you trying to destroy our agriculture industry?

[Liberty and Alderney]

I am wishing to propose a law in the WA that would be beneficial to our nation's health and improve the rights of animals. I wish to create a law that would make nations required to be vegetarian. Now this is a very radical move and I would like your support very much. And also if you are not a WA member please stay out of this thread. Ask me questions about this and I will answer via this forum or telegram. Much regards, Bordav

Out of concern for the fast food indust- I mean, people's choices and for some peoples, nessecity, we will not support this proposal.

[Bordav]

"But what will we do with the flesh of the slaughtered bourgeoisie?"

BURN IT COMRADE!

[Ferret Civilization]

"Like the other ambassadors have said, people like their meat. Out in the wilds and in nature some animals eat meat, so why should the sapient members of the WA give up meat. It's not a natural thing for everyone, forcing something like this would be really unreasonable. And if the concern is that much for other sapient creatures, it is a risk that must be taken."

[Bordav]

THis is for animals rights. Consider the benefits. It won't destroy agriculture, replace it with something that does not kill. Ahimsa my friend!

[Bordav]

"Like the other ambassadors have said, people like their meat. Out in the wilds and in nature some animals eat meat, so why should the sapient members of the WA give up meat. It's not a natural thing for everyone, forcing something like this would be really unreasonable. And if the concern is that much for other sapient creatures, it is a risk that must be taken."

How about we alter it so that animal farming is illegal but carnivorous species may hunt for their food as it is the natural way to obtain meat.

[The New American commonwealth]

Humanity (or whatever other delegates may be) have been (or most likely) been eating meat for milleniums! Outlawing it is a breach of Human Rights, desecrates some meat oriented cultures, and may disrupt Economies, so I say no, nein, non, Nyet.

[Bordav]

May I ask who else voted "Yes I definitely would!"?

[Ferret Civilization]

THis is for animals rights. Consider the benefits. It won't destroy agriculture, replace it with something that does not kill. Ahimsa my friend!

"The benefit would be one group would suffer, and possibly even die, for the protection of another. Isn't that the way it is now, no matter what some group is going to be on the raw end of the deal."

How about we alter it so that animal farming is illegal but carnivorous species may hunt for their food as it is the natural way to obtain meat.

"A little better, but it still pushes it. If you were to go along the lines that animal farming should have some regulation, might be better. Though the more experienced members here would probably have better advice."

[Bordav]

Humanity (or whatever other delegates may be) have been (or most likely) been eating meat for milleniums! Outlawing it is a breach of Human Rights, desecrates some meat oriented cultures, and may disrupt Economies, so I say no, nein, non, Nyet.

It is by no mean a breach of human rights! What about the rights of animals?

[Nouvelle o France]

How about we alter it so that animal farming is illegal but carnivorous species may hunt for their food as it is the natural way to obtain meat.

What if it's a carnivorous modern nation where no amount of hunting can ever provide enough food for the entire population ? Animal farming IS necessary, maybe a necessary evil from your perspective, but still necessary.

[Nouvelle o France]

It is by no mean a breach of human rights! What about the rights of animals?

I never saw any resolution about animal rights, so I'd say, they have none.

[The New American commonwealth]

Humanity (or whatever other delegates may be) have been (or most likely) been eating meat for milleniums! Outlawing it is a breach of Human Rights, desecrates some meat oriented cultures, and may disrupt Economies, so I say no, nein, non, Nyet.

It is by no mean a breach of human rights! What about the rights of animals?

Well, if a man chooses to eat a certain food of his free will, and people agree with him he should be able to, then banning kinda is.

[Ferret Civilization]

[It is by no mean a breach of human rights! What about the rights of animals?

"Animals attack each other all the time, some herbivores may not, but in the wild it happens. It's a part of nature, just because a more advanced group does it does not change that basic principle."

[Bordav]

It is by no mean a breach of human rights! What about the rights of animals?

I never saw any resolution about animal rights, so I'd say, they have none.

By god that's why I want to pass this resolution!

[Bordav]

Maybe we should begin with banning cattle farming, eh?

[The New American commonwealth]

I never saw any resolution about animal rights, so I'd say, they have none.

By god that's why I want to pass this resolution!

Maybe if it was about taking care of your Livestock, not abusing them, and not putting them down cruelly or have a doctors opinion first, maybe more people would be in favor of it.