by LEGGETT EMPIRE » Wed Aug 19, 2015 11:24 am
by Grays Harbor » Wed Aug 19, 2015 11:52 am
by The Alexanderians » Wed Aug 19, 2015 11:54 am
Grays Harbor wrote:Quite frankly, any nations tax code is nobodies business but theirs. Not an international issue.
Galloism wrote:Or we can go with feminism doesn't exist. We all imagined it. Collectively.
by Separatist Peoples » Wed Aug 19, 2015 12:20 pm
by Alqania » Wed Aug 19, 2015 12:21 pm
WA General Fund wrote:8. Affirms the right of member nations to maintain full authority over domestic taxation policies, barring those that may include unfair discriminatory practices;
by Separatist Peoples » Wed Aug 19, 2015 12:23 pm
Alqania wrote:"This would seem to contradict Resolution #17 WA General Fund", argued Lord Raekevik.WA General Fund wrote:8. Affirms the right of member nations to maintain full authority over domestic taxation policies, barring those that may include unfair discriminatory practices;
by Alqania » Wed Aug 19, 2015 12:36 pm
by Wrapper » Wed Aug 19, 2015 12:48 pm
Alqania wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:"This topic could be considered to be unfair or discriminatory, but only at a stretch. Rather like complying with NEF."
"How exactly could taxing veterans, or their families, like everyone else constitute discrimination? Such a system would seem to be the exact opposite of discrimination, either positive or negative."
by LEGGETT EMPIRE » Wed Aug 19, 2015 12:53 pm
by LEGGETT EMPIRE » Wed Aug 19, 2015 12:54 pm
by LEGGETT EMPIRE » Wed Aug 19, 2015 12:59 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Wed Aug 19, 2015 1:34 pm
LEGGETT EMPIRE wrote:Let's bring it to a vote. If it fails then it was never meant to be of it does then it was just and right.
by Normlpeople » Wed Aug 19, 2015 1:57 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Wed Aug 19, 2015 2:00 pm
LEGGETT EMPIRE wrote:Let's bring it to a vote. If it fails then it was never meant to be of it does then it was just and right.
by Normlpeople » Wed Aug 19, 2015 2:08 pm
LEGGETT EMPIRE wrote:This only maintains to funds given or raised to the individual and or family left behind. The normal income is still taxed but not monies given or raised in the event of permanent injury or death of service member. A mere fraction of taxes.
by LEGGETT EMPIRE » Wed Aug 19, 2015 2:46 pm
by LEGGETT EMPIRE » Wed Aug 19, 2015 2:48 pm
by Caracasus » Wed Aug 19, 2015 2:50 pm
by Baden Baden » Wed Aug 19, 2015 2:53 pm
by LEGGETT EMPIRE » Wed Aug 19, 2015 2:53 pm
by Baden Baden » Wed Aug 19, 2015 2:54 pm
LEGGETT EMPIRE wrote:What about removing language about military and only for the firefighters and police.
by Caracasus » Wed Aug 19, 2015 2:55 pm
LEGGETT EMPIRE wrote:What about removing language about military and only for the firefighters and police.
by Baden Baden » Wed Aug 19, 2015 2:55 pm
by Kaboomlandia » Wed Aug 19, 2015 2:57 pm
Baden Baden wrote:THE WORLD ASSEMBLY HAS NO RIGHT TO TELL US HOW WE TAX OUR OWN PEOPLE
by Wrapper » Wed Aug 19, 2015 2:58 pm
LEGGETT EMPIRE wrote:I am quite aware of rules.
Alqania wrote:"This would seem to contradict Resolution #17 WA General Fund", argued Lord Raekevik.WA General Fund wrote:8. Affirms the right of member nations to maintain full authority over domestic taxation policies, barring those that may include unfair discriminatory practices;
Types of Violations wrote:Contradiction
Diametric opposite to Duplication. The WA has already mandated Gay Marriage. You can't ban it without at least one Repeal.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Enzzeir Laminsr
Advertisement