Advertisement
by Noordeinde » Sun Jun 14, 2009 9:52 am
by Absolvability » Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:04 am
Noordeinde wrote:Mister Ambassador, if I'm irritating you and you aren't willig to come up with feedback which I can use in the final proposal and this is my thread I think you might want to leave this thread alone from now on. I do find you verry exaggerated with your statements, and that's anoying me.
by Grand Europic States » Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:07 am
by Rhodmhire » Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:14 am
by Noordeinde » Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:16 am
by Glen-Rhodes » Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:25 am
Absolvability wrote:In this particular scenario it would not be a duplication. It would be a HoC though because if torture were to no longer be illegal then the other would be prosecuting something perfectly legal.
by Absolvability » Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:42 am
House of Cards wrote:This is becoming problematic. (1)If those Resolutions are repealed, you've gutted the base of your own Resolution. (2)Also, we start to run into issues for new proposals.
A Proposal must be able to stand on its own even if all referenced Resolutions were struck from existance; however, you may assign duties to an existing committee. Should the Resolution that creates the committe be Repealed, the committee will continue to exist, but in a reduced capacity. (3)If your Proposal "builds on" an existing Resolution, you're ammending that resolution.
Creating Stuff wrote:Committees may be created, as long as certain things are kept in mind: nations do not sit on committees, they are staffed by mystical beings that instantly spring into existance and live only to serve on said committee. Committees are also bound by the above MetaGame rules. Also, keep in mind that Committees are additions to Proposals; they shouldn't be all the Proposal does.
Glen-Rhodes wrote:(OOC: That is not House of Cards. Jesus. Stop being willfully ignorant. Just because something is stupid doesn't mean it's against the rules. I've half a mind to just write a damned international court resolution myself, since apparently I'm the only one here that actually understands the rules and how they work.)
by Glen-Rhodes » Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:14 am
Absolvability wrote:1) A court is a judicial body. It requires laws to function. These laws, however, may be repealed. Therefore it is unwise to specifically list any law that is defined by previous legislation. If these resolutions were repealed this Court thingy would indeed be gutted.
Absolvability wrote:3) Granting authority to a Court to prosecute offenders of particular crimes is an amendment to any resolution that leaves such judicial matters of prosecution and punishment to national sovereignty or has their own committee to arbitrate/mediate such affairs.
Absolvability wrote:This whole Court thing is basically just one big committee.
by Noordeinde » Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:21 am
by Absolvability » Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:28 am
Glen-Rhodes wrote:(OOC: Your preconceived notions of what an international court, or a court alone, is, and what authority it has, are the reasons why you mistakenly attribute House of Cards. In the case of this proposal, the Court would be allowed to prosecute torture and the like, without any resolutions declaring torture illegal, because the resolution says it can.)
Glen-Rhodes wrote:But, it does more than creating a committee, it provides for the prosecution of criminals.
by Absolvability » Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:29 am
by Glen-Rhodes » Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:40 am
by Absolvability » Sun Jun 14, 2009 7:02 pm
Glen-Rhodes wrote:(OOC: You are acting incredibly immature, Absolvability. Stop flaming or stop posting in the World Assembly forum, period.)
by Philimbesi » Tue Jun 16, 2009 4:14 am
by Sionis Prioratus » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:07 am
by SilentScope4 » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:25 pm
The World Assembly
REITERATES the right of all NationStates to self-defense,
CONFIRMS the right of a soldier to self-defense, yet limiting it to a judicious response,
1. PROHIBITS all military forces in any way funded by a memberstate's government, or any governmental organization therein, from either directly or indirectly causing civilian casualties in any armed conflict, unless the military forces exercise due diligence in trying to avoid and/or significantly reduce civilian casualties.
2. FURTHER PROHIBITS military forces in any way funded by a memberstate's government, or any governmental organization therein, from having their military forces pretend to be civilians or attempt to use civilians as 'human shields'. This clause does not affect clandestine intelligence assets or agents from pretending to be civilians.
3. DECLARES that targeting civilian areas of strategic value in order to prosecute a state's war aims is allowed, so long as clauses 1 & 2 are obeyed.
4. REQUIRES all nations to modify their military tactics and weapon programs in order to comply with Clauses 1 and 2.
5. ESTABLISHES the World Assembly War Crimes Tribunal and tasks it with the goal of investigating and fairly trying all alleged violations of the Clauses 1 and 2 by agents of memberstates, if requested by any nation that is party to the alleged violations.
6. DECLARES that the WAWCT tribunals will grant suspects a trial fair in every respect. The trials will render a verdict on all defendants and suggest, but not enforce, a sentence on guilty parties. The additional conditions are placed on WAWCT trials:
-The governmental authority affiliated with the defendant is allowed to appoint legal advisers, including lawyers and experts in military affairs.
-The governmental authority affiliated with the victims is allowed to appoint legal advisers, including lawyers and experts in military affairs.
-The WAWCT may accept advice and/or testimony from relevant non-governmental organizations.
-The defendant and the victim(s) have the right to bear witness in court.
-No defendant shall be acquitted because they were following orders of a superior.
-Those who order crimes shall be held as accountable as those who committed them.
-No person shall be tried twice for the same offense.
-No crime occurring before this resolution shall be prosecuted by the WAWCT.
7. DECREES that if an individual is found guilty of violating Clause 1 or Clause 2 by the WAWCT, that nation's government must:
(a) pay WAWCT ordered monetary reparations to the victims, or their next of kin AND
(b) arrest and prosecute all war criminals who are found guilty of breaking Clause 1 or Clause 2 in a fair trial. The WAWCT is to provide its evidence and court records to the judiciary of the memberstate for the purposes of the trial.
8. AUTHORIZES the WAWCT to investigate the practices of nations that lead to individual war crimes. Grants the WAWCT the power to impose appropriate sanctions on any nation who is found in repeat violation of Clause 1 or Clause 2, until the nation enacts WAWCT mandated reforms to end the practices that lead to violations of this resolution.
Co-written by SilentScope Embassy
<preamble to be added in later>
1. PROHIBITS all military forces from either directly or indirectly causing civilian casualties in any armed conflict unless the military forces excerised due diligence in trying to avoid or significantly reduce civilian casualties.
2. FURTHER PROHIBTS military forces from having their military forces pretend to be civilians or attempt to use civilians as 'human shields'.
3. DECLARES that the targeting of areas of strategic value in order to prosecute a state's sovereign war aims is allowed, as long as the military forces follow the above Clauses and excerised due diligence,
4. REQUIRES all nations to modify their military tactics and weapon programs in order to comply with Clauses 1 and 2,
5. ESTABLISHES the United Nations War Crime Tribunal and tasks it with the goal of investigating all alleged violations of the Clauses 1 and 2 by memberstates, if requested by the targeted nation.
6. DECREES that if a memberstate is found guilty of violating Clause 1 or Clause 2 by the UNWCT, the government must:
(a)pay monetary reparations to the families of dead or injured civilians AND
(b)arrest and prosecute all war criminals who are found guilty of breaking Clause 1 or Clause 2.
7. MANDATES the UNWCT impose sanctions on any nation who is found in repeat violation of Clause 1 or Clause 2, until the nation refrains from committing the violations. (OR
7. MANDATES the UNWCT impose sanctions on any nation who is found in repeat violation of either the spirit or the letter of Clause 1 or Clause 2, until the nation refrains from committing the violations.)
by Tiesabre » Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:52 am
Firing upon a Combat Medic with clear insignia
by SilentScope4 » Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:08 am
5. (1) Nations must facilitate the extradition of those suspected of the crimes specified in section 4 to the appropriate authority should they have escaped outside of the appropriate authority's control, subject to national and international law.
(2) The crimes specified in section 4 may not be considered political crimes for the purposes of preventing extradition proceedings.
by Star Isles » Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:53 pm
by Doctor Cyclops » Fri Jun 26, 2009 5:24 pm
by Glen-Rhodes » Fri Jun 26, 2009 5:47 pm
by Absolvability » Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:36 pm
Glen-Rhodes wrote:(OOC: I think this one is dead, guys.)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement